Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:16 pm
Some more MN girls are starting to pop up on the site.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
keepitreal wrote:Concordia announces; Bethel adds even more
GAC announces 6/2
Updated 6/2 per Beyond the Dashers
Bethel University
Molly Eagles........D......Roseville HS
Hillary Hartwig.....F.......Elk River HS
Elizabeth Huss.....F.......Silver Bay HS
Sarah Kartak......F.......Lakeville South HS
Cali Miller.........F........Lakeville North HS
Jessica Newstrom....G.....Cambridge-Isanti HS
Sarah Olson.......D.......Byron HS / Dodge County
Melissa Vavra.....D.....Hopkins HS
Kate Wahlin.......F/D.....Lakeville South HS
College of St. Catherine
Cassandra Vennemann....D....St. Paul Johnson HS/St. Paul Blades
Kayla Lange.......G.......Anoka HS
Concordia College Minnesota
Kerry Blomberg.......F......N Wright County
Desiree Goret..........G......Rosemount HS
Macy Leland........D...........N Metro Stars
Aly Nelson.........D.............Maple Grove HS
Kaia Sele.........G...........Bemidji HS
Abby Vig...........D...........St. Louis Park HS
Jenna Westerham....F.......Hopkins HS
Concordia University Wisconsin
Samantha Meuwissen.......F.......Chaska HS/Minnesota Thoroughbreds
Sara Cole......D......The Blake School
Carly Piras........F........Eden Prairie HS
Gustavus Adolphus College
Jenna Christensen.......F.........Albert Lea HS
Lindsay Hjelm...............F/D.......Mounds View HS
Kelsey Kennedy.............D.........Eagan HS
Mia Kramka.................D...........Mounds View HS
Tamara Meuwissen..........F........Chaska HS/Minnesota Thoroughbreds
Hamline University
Ashley Maskel........D.........Eastview HS
Middlebury College
Madison Strybricki.....F/D.....Breck School
St. Michael's College
Allison Graf..........D.......Orono HS/Minnesota Thoroughbreds
St. Mary's University (Minnesota)
Brianna Drude........D/F.......North St Paul HS
Kaye Collier...........G..........Hibbing HS
Tara Rasmusen......F..........Kasson-Mantorville HS/Dodge County
St. Olaf College
Allison Umland.......F.........Wayzata HS
Nicole Stumpf........F.........Hill-Murray School
University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire
Allison Malecek.....F.......Buffalo HS
University of Wisconsin, River Falls
Alyssa Black......F......Mankato West HS
Judy Daleiden.......F/D.....Blaine HS
Alyssa Jackson.....F/D.....Cambridge-Isanti HS
Alex Morey......F......Robbinsdale Armstrong HS/Minnesota Thoroughbreds
Shelby Rasmussen.......G........Wayzata HS
Jami Weiss...........F........Proctor/Hermantown/Marshall
University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point
Brooke Hanson.......F.......Maple Grove HS/Minnesota Thoroughbreds
University of Wisconsin, Superior
Alyssa Breu......D........Shattuck/UND (transfer)
Chelsey Wierschem.....F.....Willmar HS
Congratulations to the athletes!
Yah, they were/are looking for another assistant coach to fill the spot they didn't interview for last year...go figure. Do they even recruit? I don't think I ever saw them at any SEC games last year.Hansonbrother wrote:Any news out of Augsburg yet?
She is a good player. However her previous school graduated six seniors. Four of which were forwards. Look at the stats. Two had more points then her. We are also talking about woodbury which hasn't been the strongest girls hockey program. Why not try to recruit from a proven program?FrankThom wrote:JAF -
What is the purpose of the rip on the high school kid? Her parents do something to you?
This is very true. I assume you are talking about emily klatt. If Carissa Miller is playing for augsburg, which at this point isn't confirmed, she is a great addition. Yes, there were girls that had more points than her, however she is a playmaker. She set up plays better than most of the girls on woodbury last season.hockeywild7 wrote:Just because you don't play for a "proven" high school program, whatever that is defined as, doesn't mean you don't have potential to be a great college player. Woodbury plays in the SEC which is one of the toughest conferences in the state if not the toughest. They recently graduated one of the best goalies I have seen in high school the past couple of years.
Sorry for the rip. If anything it was a rip on Augsburg, not the girl. I wish her all the luck. I wonder who you are ROYALmoose25. Next time let's pick a covert nickname.ROYALmoose25 wrote:This is very true. I assume you are talking about emily klatt. If Carissa Miller is playing for augsburg, which at this point isn't confirmed, she is a great addition. Yes, there were girls that had more points than her, however she is a playmaker. She set up plays better than most of the girls on woodbury last season.hockeywild7 wrote:Just because you don't play for a "proven" high school program, whatever that is defined as, doesn't mean you don't have potential to be a great college player. Woodbury plays in the SEC which is one of the toughest conferences in the state if not the toughest. They recently graduated one of the best goalies I have seen in high school the past couple of years.
Thanks for the tip.Just_Another_Fan wrote:Sorry for the rip. If anything it was a rip on Augsburg, not the girl. I wish her all the luck. I wonder who you are ROYALmoose25. Next time let's pick a covert nickname.ROYALmoose25 wrote:This is very true. I assume you are talking about emily klatt. If Carissa Miller is playing for augsburg, which at this point isn't confirmed, she is a great addition. Yes, there were girls that had more points than her, however she is a playmaker. She set up plays better than most of the girls on woodbury last season.hockeywild7 wrote:Just because you don't play for a "proven" high school program, whatever that is defined as, doesn't mean you don't have potential to be a great college player. Woodbury plays in the SEC which is one of the toughest conferences in the state if not the toughest. They recently graduated one of the best goalies I have seen in high school the past couple of years.
Can I ask this question though, If you were a college coach, wouldn't you look for players at programs that are perennially strong. I guess my thought process is simple, "There's a reason teams are strong...good players make them strong."hockeywild7 wrote:Just because you don't play for a "proven" high school program, whatever that is defined as, doesn't mean you don't have potential to be a great college player. Woodbury plays in the SEC which is one of the toughest conferences in the state if not the toughest. They recently graduated one of the best goalies I have seen in high school the past couple of years.
From my experience D3 coaches are trying to fit puzzle parts together and the recruiting is often subtle. Of course it is often after the fact (D1 ignorance so to speak). Great players find the school that fits - hopefully they fit the coaches system. If you attend games in either the MIAC or NCHA you'll notice that the "team" usually has a player style. A good example would be GA - not the biggest - fast, controls center ice, good toughness in the corners.Hansonbrother wrote:Can I ask this question though, If you were a college coach, wouldn't you look for players at programs that are perennially strong. I guess my thought process is simple, "There's a reason teams are strong...good players make them strong."hockeywild7 wrote:Just because you don't play for a "proven" high school program, whatever that is defined as, doesn't mean you don't have potential to be a great college player. Woodbury plays in the SEC which is one of the toughest conferences in the state if not the toughest. They recently graduated one of the best goalies I have seen in high school the past couple of years.
Don't mistake me here, I'm not saying that there aren't good players in bad programs, or lesser programs, because there are great players in lesser programs. I think its easy to look in the paper and find leading scorers around the state and try and recruit them. However, I don't feel that you always get the best players that way. There are many GREAT players that don't score.
What I'm driving at without stating specifics, I watch and follow a team that is typically pretty good, and I've heard that very few of their players ever get talked to by any of the D-3 schools. That makes no sense to me.
From my experience D3 coaches are trying to fit puzzle parts together and the recruiting is often subtle. Of course it is often after the fact (D1 ignorance so to speak). Great players find the school that fits - hopefully they fit the coaches system. If you attend games in either the MIAC or NCHA you'll notice that the "team" usually has a player style. A good example would be GA - not the biggest - fast, controls center ice, good toughness in the corners.Hansonbrother wrote:Can I ask this question though, If you were a college coach, wouldn't you look for players at programs that are perennially strong. I guess my thought process is simple, "There's a reason teams are strong...good players make them strong."hockeywild7 wrote:Just because you don't play for a "proven" high school program, whatever that is defined as, doesn't mean you don't have potential to be a great college player. Woodbury plays in the SEC which is one of the toughest conferences in the state if not the toughest. They recently graduated one of the best goalies I have seen in high school the past couple of years.
Don't mistake me here, I'm not saying that there aren't good players in bad programs, or lesser programs, because there are great players in lesser programs. I think its easy to look in the paper and find leading scorers around the state and try and recruit them. However, I don't feel that you always get the best players that way. There are many GREAT players that don't score.
What I'm driving at without stating specifics, I watch and follow a team that is typically pretty good, and I've heard that very few of their players ever get talked to by any of the D-3 schools. That makes no sense to me.
I haven't seen a MIAC or NCHA game, but I have seen one of the MIAC teams practice, and I'm convinced that the high school team that a friend of mine coaches could beat them. So based on your argument of looking for players that "Fit", wouldn't they be better off putting a system together based on exploiting their players talents versus trying to make players fit the system?Puck Bag wrote:From my experience D3 coaches are trying to fit puzzle parts together and the recruiting is often subtle. Of course it is often after the fact (D1 ignorance so to speak). Great players find the school that fits - hopefully they fit the coaches system. If you attend games in either the MIAC or NCHA you'll notice that the "team" usually has a player style. A good example would be GA - not the biggest - fast, controls center ice, good toughness in the corners.Hansonbrother wrote:Can I ask this question though, If you were a college coach, wouldn't you look for players at programs that are perennially strong. I guess my thought process is simple, "There's a reason teams are strong...good players make them strong."hockeywild7 wrote:Just because you don't play for a "proven" high school program, whatever that is defined as, doesn't mean you don't have potential to be a great college player. Woodbury plays in the SEC which is one of the toughest conferences in the state if not the toughest. They recently graduated one of the best goalies I have seen in high school the past couple of years.
Don't mistake me here, I'm not saying that there aren't good players in bad programs, or lesser programs, because there are great players in lesser programs. I think its easy to look in the paper and find leading scorers around the state and try and recruit them. However, I don't feel that you always get the best players that way. There are many GREAT players that don't score.
What I'm driving at without stating specifics, I watch and follow a team that is typically pretty good, and I've heard that very few of their players ever get talked to by any of the D-3 schools. That makes no sense to me.
Most of the schools look for the "fit" not for the team they played for in high school.