HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

blanco oso wrote:

Goldfishdude wrote:Garin David scored a goal last game. They had Jansen with Wahlin and Wolter, which I like, and I think Pasi and Hausi have too good of chemistry to break up.... I'd leave David with Pasi and Hausi. Keep WBL's version of "the HOFF" back at D....

But then again, I drink too much!!!

yah i dont know...its going to be interesting tonight

THey are equal with points but Jansen has 2 more goals, while David has 2 more assists.

3-1 WBL [/quote wrote:
EMpty Netter from WBL first Line?

any updates on the score of this game?

gopher05 wrote:any updates on the score of this game?

WBL 5
Roseville 3

Empty netter

White Bear 5
Roseville 3

Lowell leads off the scoring about 15 seconds into the game, and finishes things off with an empty netter. Wahlin also scores two and Gjerde fires in an absolute cannon from the point.

Another very poorly officiated SEC game. Seeing that WBL won, I shouldn't complain. But it is too much to ask for a little competency from the refs? Everytime the Bears scored, they'd get some ticky tack (no Goldfish, not jicky jack) or phantom penalty. A Roseville player puts Hoffman in a headlock and throws him to the ice right in front of the Bear's net, and right in front of the ref - a blatant no call!

i hope that one kid doesnt shhot himself...anyways.
lowells goal was the sickest dangles/roof goal ive ever seen.
if this wb team shows up in sections they could be playing TARTAN to go to state!!!

The best thing, blanco, is that if that kid does shoot himself, the Roseville police won't have too far to get to the crime scene with it darn near sharing the same parking lot...

Goldfishdude wrote:The best thing, blanco, is that if that kid does shoot himself, the Roseville police won't have too far to get to the crime scene with it darn near sharing the same parking lot...

you know for having a journalism degree you sure dont know how to use your "to's" right. to, too, two.

but yes i agree

I have nerve damage in my finger, but not enough to pluck you in the back of the ear, young man!!!

blanco..... read and weep!!! straight from a google page...

--------------------------------

What's the difference between to, too, and two? It's not too difficult to use them, once you take the time to learn what they mean - and do some practicing too.


To

To has two functions. First, as a preposition, in which case it always precedes a noun.

I'm going to the store

He went to Italy

This belongs to David

Secondly, to indicates an infinitive when it precedes a verb.

I need to study

We want to help

He's going to eat


Too

Too also has two uses. First, as a synonym for "also":

Can I go too?

He went to France too

I think that's Paul's book too

Secondly, too means excessively when it precedes an adjective or adverb.

I'm too tired

He's walking too quickly

I ate too much


--------------------------------
Do you think you want TO correct me again anytime soon???

blanco oso wrote:

Goldfishdude wrote:The best thing, blanco, is that if that kid does shoot himself, the Roseville police won't have too far to get to the crime scene with it darn near sharing the same parking lot...

you know for having a journalism degree you sure dont know how to use your "to's" right. to, too, two.

but yes i agree

Actually, young friend, Goldfishy is correct! "Too Far". I learned a few things in journalism school as well. Reference my signature line...

He better be in bed getting ready for classes - 'specially English class!!! I may be short, fat, bald and ugly, but..... I lost my train of thought!!!

I always enjoy the displays of grammar vigilanteism on here.

People who write well tend to be the ones with the most credibility on the bored. But if you're going to go and correct someone, it's always good to make sure you're right...

Is it bored or board?

what a huge win for the bears... who are now ranked over Roseville in the SEC according to pointstreak.com.

It's a good time to be a Bears fan. They're playing their best hockey of the season (6-2-1 in their last 9 games), and are getting all their guns back. Could be a dangerous team...

MrBoDangles wrote:Is it bored or board?

Wow, I wasn't even thinking about that when I slipped it in.

Calling the board a "bored" is a bit of a running joke on here.

The way this game started, it looked like it was going to be a blowout. Lowell scores about 30 seconds in, and the next two shots hit iron. The final score really doesn't show how much I thought White Bear dominated this game. I have to give my hats off to the Roseville goalie, he made some great point blank, and 2 on 1 opportunities saves in the 3rd period. It easily could have been 7-3, but ended 5-3. The WBL D looked very solid in this one, and I thought Putney had his best game of the year. I wouldn't want to be the team that has to play the Bears come section time!

WBLHockeyfan04 wrote:The way this game started, it looked like it was going to be a blowout. Lowell scores about 30 seconds in, and the next two shots hit iron. The final score really doesn't show how much I thought White Bear dominated this game. I have to give my hats off to the Roseville goalie, he made some great point blank, and 2 on 1 opportunities saves in the 3rd period. It easily could have been 7-3, but ended 5-3. The WBL D looked very solid in this one, and I thought Putney had his best game of the year. I wouldn't want to be the team that has to play the Bears come section time!

Why so shocked? I know he didn't score, but he was solid all night back on D, and stepped up great in the offensive zone last night. I've been to a number of games this year where he looked inconsistent, and made poor decisions with the puck coming out of the zone. I didn't see any of that last night. Unless you saw something I missed? I guess saying it was his best game may have been a little overboard, but I was satisfied with what I saw.