Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:09 pm
by nickmon3
Hibbing 6
Duluth Denfeld 2
Shots:
Hibbing 42
Duluth Denfeld 29
Ryan Johnson had another hat trick for hibbing
Re: tonka vs. blake
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:32 pm
by schwang17
starmvp wrote:blueblood wrote:tonka - 6
blake - 1
it was 2-1 with just under 9 minutes to play. blake played well for 2 1/2 periods, before tonka took over scoring 4 goals in a 6 minute span.
Wow, expected a little more scoring out of Tonka. A win's a win though...
Blake is a top 10 Class A team, you know.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:45 pm
by wingmaster
Urick told them to not run up the score, it's "not very classy".

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:47 pm
by playerplayer1
starmvp wrote:playerplayer1 wrote:Lakeville South 9
Rochester Century 1
4 minutes to go
Kloos-hat trick, Osterberg 2 goals
Which Osterberg? Followthepuck says it was Zach (the senior).
Kyle Osterberg had 2 goals and 3 assists, Kloos 3 G, 2 A, Harvey 3 A.
I think that line has 97 points this year!
Re: tonka vs. blake
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:55 pm
by HockeyMN1
schwang17 wrote:starmvp wrote:blueblood wrote:tonka - 6
blake - 1
it was 2-1 with just under 9 minutes to play. blake played well for 2 1/2 periods, before tonka took over scoring 4 goals in a 6 minute span.
Wow, expected a little more scoring out of Tonka. A win's a win though...
Blake is a top 10 Class A team, you know.
And Tonka is the top team in the real class. Suprised at only 6 from them.
Re: tonka vs. blake
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:29 am
by Slap Shot
HockeyMN1 wrote:schwang17 wrote:starmvp wrote:
Wow, expected a little more scoring out of Tonka. A win's a win though...
Blake is a top 10 Class A team, you know.
And Tonka is the top team in the real class. Suprised at only 6 from them.
Tonaks was missing 3 players keep in mind.
Re: tonka vs. blake
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:23 am
by Gov78
HockeyMN1 wrote:schwang17 wrote:starmvp wrote:
Wow, expected a little more scoring out of Tonka. A win's a win though...
Blake is a top 10 Class A team, you know.
And Tonka is the top team in the real class. Suprised at only 6 from them.
Wow, every year a ton of people complain about teams running up the score and padding stats (multiple threads on boys and girls boards this year) but when one ranked team beats another ranked team by 5 goals it's not enough. If they had beaten Blake by 15 the same people would say that was poor sportmanship
Perhaps there should be a formula that when Team A ranked "x" plays Team B ranked "y" at location "z" the score differential must be at least "delta" otherwise it'll be classified as an underperformance.

Run Up the Score?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:02 am
by Walter Sojack
Running up the score? Even if Tonka wanted to, they wouldn't have been able to run up the score. It was 2-1 with 8 minutes to play...
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:17 am
by bloody bar down
Brainerd 3
Sartell 0
Re: Run Up the Score?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:31 am
by Gov78
Walter Sojack wrote:Running up the score? Even if Tonka wanted to, they wouldn't have been able to run up the score. It was 2-1 with 8 minutes to play...
Wasn't my point, it was more about some people never being satisfied with anything as everything is either too hot or too cold or doesn't meet their expectations.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:52 am
by GopherHockey
Oh I'm sure they could have scored more if they wanted

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:00 pm
by BodyShots
sinbin006 wrote:karl(east) wrote:mj79 wrote:any word on the east/ER game?
FTP has 3-2 ER after two.
3-2 Final.
Why hasn't this topic been locked or removed? It shows DE losing to ER!

Is that allowed?

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:07 pm
by east hockey
BodyShots wrote:sinbin006 wrote:karl(east) wrote:
FTP has 3-2 ER after two.
3-2 Final.
Why hasn't this topic been locked or removed? It shows DE losing to ER!

Is that allowed?

As the Soup Nazi said, "You're pushing your luck, little man".
Lee
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:06 pm
by spicey goat
Brainerd 3
Sartell 0
Brainerd goalie played great