HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

The White Bear crowd looks extremely extinct tonight.

wbmd wrote:The White Bear crowd looks extremely extinct tonight.

I was thinking that same thing.

WBL-6
Flake-5

WB dominated this game and then quit in the last 5 min and Flake scored like 4 goals. Wow

wbmd wrote:The White Bear crowd looks extremely extinct tonight.

That's how they've looked all year. This year's student section doesn't have the usual spirit that we've seen in years past. In fact, it's almost always under 20 students, from what I've seen.

Wish I would have known this was being broadcasted earlier, would have watched.

I like how white bears jv team can keep up with flake and when WBL is up 5-2 they cant play there 4th line... i think its sager should be ashamed after how kids like (sam,jonny,jack) step up when sager needs them most and then wont let them touch the ice when the have a 3 goal lead... WBL won 5-4 not impresive...

got some wrote:

wbmd wrote:The White Bear crowd looks extremely extinct tonight.

That's how they've looked all year. This year's student section doesn't have the usual spirit that we've seen in years past. In fact, it's almost always under 20 students, from what I've seen.

Wish I would have known this was being **broadcast earlier, would have watched.

Hey we've got the BEARS line, along with our other loyal fans (ahem.)

We had a big turn out tonight, but everyone needs to understand that the SEC (WBL ESPECIALLY) has been making an effort to clean up student sections. They aren't taking it lightly either! All signs/props/flags, positive or negative are being taken away with no questions asked. The SEC has put in quite a few brand new rules in effect this year.

As for the game, Bears dominated mostly and got lazy at the end.
If it weren't for the ridiculous amount of penalties the Bears took, it probably would have looked a little different.

wblhockeyfan8 wrote:

got some wrote:

wbmd wrote:The White Bear crowd looks extremely extinct tonight.

That's how they've looked all year. This year's student section doesn't have the usual spirit that we've seen in years past. In fact, it's almost always under 20 students, from what I've seen.

Wish I would have known this was being **broadcast earlier, would have watched.

Hey we've got the BEARS line, along with our other loyal fans (ahem.)

We had a big turn out tonight, but everyone needs to understand that the SEC (WBL ESPECIALLY) has been making an effort to clean up student sections. They aren't taking it lightly either! All signs/props/flags, positive or negative are being taken away with no questions asked. The SEC has put in quite a few brand new rules in effect this year.

As for the game, Bears dominated mostly and got lazy at the end.
If it weren't for the ridiculous amount of penalties the Bears took, it probably would have looked a little different.

Looked to me like da Bears goalie just had a better game. The play seemed pretty close, maybe even favored FL a little bit.

MrBoDangles wrote:

wblhockeyfan8 wrote:

got some wrote: That's how they've looked all year. This year's student section doesn't have the usual spirit that we've seen in years past. In fact, it's almost always under 20 students, from what I've seen.

Wish I would have known this was being **broadcast earlier, would have watched.

Hey we've got the BEARS line, along with our other loyal fans (ahem.)

We had a big turn out tonight, but everyone needs to understand that the SEC (WBL ESPECIALLY) has been making an effort to clean up student sections. They aren't taking it lightly either! All signs/props/flags, positive or negative are being taken away with no questions asked. The SEC has put in quite a few brand new rules in effect this year.

As for the game, Bears dominated mostly and got lazy at the end.
If it weren't for the ridiculous amount of penalties the Bears took, it probably would have looked a little different.

Looked to me like da Bears goalie just had a better game. The play seemed pretty close, maybe even favored FL a little bit.

WBL controlled the 5 on 5 play really well, Way to many dumb penalties cost them a 5-2 lead late in the game.

forest Lake outshot the Bears 42-32.

formerlybackofnet wrote:

MrBoDangles wrote:

wblhockeyfan8 wrote: Hey we've got the BEARS line, along with our other loyal fans (ahem.)

We had a big turn out tonight, but everyone needs to understand that the SEC (WBL ESPECIALLY) has been making an effort to clean up student sections. They aren't taking it lightly either! All signs/props/flags, positive or negative are being taken away with no questions asked. The SEC has put in quite a few brand new rules in effect this year.

As for the game, Bears dominated mostly and got lazy at the end.
If it weren't for the ridiculous amount of penalties the Bears took, it probably would have looked a little different.

Looked to me like da Bears goalie just had a better game. The play seemed pretty close, maybe even favored FL a little bit.

WBL controlled the 5 on 5 play really well, Way to many dumb penalties cost them a 5-2 lead late in the game.

Maybe they didn't, but it seemed like FL had more shots the first two periods...

Rock_N_RevivaL wrote:I like how white bears jv team can keep up with flake and when WBL is up 5-2 they cant play there 4th line... i think its sager should be ashamed after how kids like (sam,jonny,jack) step up when sager needs them most and then wont let them touch the ice when the have a 3 goal lead... WBL won 5-4 not impresive...

I think he learned his lesson in the MV game on Saturday. With a three goal lead, the 4th line got a shift at the 10 minute mark of the third period. At the end of their shift, MV scored. Then in the next shift, Wahlin had a terrible turnover and MV scorred again. What was a comfortable 3 goal lead, became a nerve racking 1 goal lead. I don't think he wanted that to happen again. It caused hair loss.

wbmd wrote:

gophs16 wrote:

captainjimmy18 wrote:Bears-6
Flake-2

No way does WBL score 6. Flake wins 3-2

I have to agree with gophs16 about Forest Lake not giving up six goals.

So, how does ones foot taste when it is firmly placed in ones mouth.

BodyShots wrote:

wbmd wrote:

gophs16 wrote: No way does WBL score 6. Flake wins 3-2

I have to agree with gophs16 about Forest Lake not giving up six goals.

So, how does ones foot taste when it is firmly placed in ones mouth.

One of the six was an empty netter, not quite the same as the goalie giving up six goals. Plus White Bear scored on a penalty shot for their second goal.

Five goals allowed by White Bear doesn't say much about their goaltending and defense either.

wbmd wrote:

BodyShots wrote:

wbmd wrote: I have to agree with gophs16 about Forest Lake not giving up six goals.

So, how does ones foot taste when it is firmly placed in ones mouth.

One of the six was an empty netter, not quite the same as the goalie giving up six goals. Plus White Bear scored on a penalty shot for their second goal.

Five goals allowed by White Bear doesn't say much about their goaltending and defense either.

The point is, CaptainJimmy predicted the Bears would score 6 goals and you and Gophs16 were saying there was NO WAY Flake would give up six goals. Well, the final score was WBL 6. I would say he was right on in that department. Congrats Captain, for predicting the WBL output. I'm sure you figured in the Penalty Shot and EN into your prediction.

BodyShots wrote:

Rock_N_RevivaL wrote:I like how white bears jv team can keep up with flake and when WBL is up 5-2 they cant play there 4th line... i think its sager should be ashamed after how kids like (sam,jonny,jack) step up when sager needs them most and then wont let them touch the ice when the have a 3 goal lead... WBL won 5-4 not impresive...

I think he learned his lesson in the MV game on Saturday. With a three goal lead, the 4th line got a shift at the 10 minute mark of the third period. At the end of their shift, MV scored. Then in the next shift, Wahlin had a terrible turnover and MV scorred again. What was a comfortable 3 goal lead, became a nerve racking 1 goal lead. I don't think he wanted that to happen again. It caused hair loss.

Maybe the 4th line should be re-valuated with some other players that performed during the Varsity's break. I heard there were a few others that really played well. Possibly a couple of defense also.

Hey Rock-N-Revival players earn the right to play in a Varsity game not because Daddy makes a phone call to the school. Nothing was proved by any J.V/4th liners except maybe they are a little to pampered at home.

BodyShots wrote:

wbmd wrote:

BodyShots wrote: So, how does ones foot taste when it is firmly placed in ones mouth.

One of the six was an empty netter, not quite the same as the goalie giving up six goals. Plus White Bear scored on a penalty shot for their second goal.

Five goals allowed by White Bear doesn't say much about their goaltending and defense either.

The point is, CaptainJimmy predicted the Bears would score 6 goals and you and Gophs16 were saying there was NO WAY Flake would give up six goals. Well, the final score was WBL 6. I would say he was right on in that department. Congrats Captain, for predicting the WBL output. I'm sure you figured in the Penalty Shot and EN into your prediction.

Why thank you sir. And of course I had that empty netter and PS on the predic for sure lol kidding of course. Either way 6 goals is 6 goals. As far as wbmd and gophs16 go..... psh child please.

captainjimmy18 wrote:

BodyShots wrote:

wbmd wrote: One of the six was an empty netter, not quite the same as the goalie giving up six goals. Plus White Bear scored on a penalty shot for their second goal.

Five goals allowed by White Bear doesn't say much about their goaltending and defense either.

The point is, CaptainJimmy predicted the Bears would score 6 goals and you and Gophs16 were saying there was NO WAY Flake would give up six goals. Well, the final score was WBL 6. I would say he was right on in that department. Congrats Captain, for predicting the WBL output. I'm sure you figured in the Penalty Shot and EN into your prediction.

Why thank you sir. And of course I had that empty netter and PS on the predic for sure lol kidding of course. Either way 6 goals is 6 goals. As far as wbmd and gophs16 go..... psh child please.

Well my hats off to ya captain though you really lucked out on this one. I tried to get fancy on that one and call out the Bears, now I just feel dumb...

gophs16 wrote:

captainjimmy18 wrote:

BodyShots wrote: The point is, CaptainJimmy predicted the Bears would score 6 goals and you and Gophs16 were saying there was NO WAY Flake would give up six goals. Well, the final score was WBL 6. I would say he was right on in that department. Congrats Captain, for predicting the WBL output. I'm sure you figured in the Penalty Shot and EN into your prediction.

Why thank you sir. And of course I had that empty netter and PS on the predic for sure lol kidding of course. Either way 6 goals is 6 goals. As far as wbmd and gophs16 go..... psh child please.

Well my hats off to ya captain though you really lucked out on this one. I tried to get fancy on that one and call out the Bears, now I just feel dumb...

Thanks. Ya I did get lucky but all the same lol.