Page 2 of 2
Super Series
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:05 pm
by ilike2score
Comparing Super series to selects is apples to green apples. the sixth month age difference the talent level will always favor the older kids. That being said the Super series kids would win over the selects 9 out of ten times.
And yet those select kids have a ton of talent.
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:48 pm
by pantherfan
hockeyover40 wrote:hockeyover40 wrote:The Selects publish rosters for all age levels. Why don't the SS?
Anybody from the blades care to comment? Terry?
I'm just saying, easier to compare which is better hockey if you can see the rosters for both tournaments.
You would have to know a ton of kids to see which has more talent. 1 or 2 kids will not make one better then the other. What age bracket do you want I have the list for all teams. Here are some Minor Bantams
Houle Blaine Epping M C
Bacon MT Meade RM
Klein MT Crowell RM
Smith AV Wewerka H C
Buthchel Shakopee Palecek M C
Warner AV Nuutinen Hudson
Munson EP Olson IGH
Byers LK S
Meink EP
Fox LK S
Lawrence EP
Thats a few of them
Ramsey MT
Sako Bl Jeff
Loene S S M
Milroy Shattuck St Marys
Dineen S S M
Lyon Shakopee
Gernentz RM
Cass Stillwater
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:52 am
by hockeyover40
You're right, it would be nearly impossible to know about every age bracket. My knowledge would be in minor and major squirts, and minor PW. But everybody could compare whatever level they have some knowledge about. And I'm sure there would be differences in opinions.
The question was Selects or SS. Getting opinions on every age level would help to answer that question.