Page 2 of 2

Northern Wings

Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 6:56 pm
by citiescoach
That was at the 99 championship game I saw.

Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 11:19 pm
by gdahl
I would be curious to see what kind of team the Wings and the Stars would field if they had a tryout process which selected the best kids from these two teams along with the other top end talent they have overlooked. At all age levels. I would suspect that could be a team to rival the Blades and Machine any day.

Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:17 pm
by getoveryourbadself
gdahl wrote:I would be curious to see what kind of team the Wings and the Stars would field if they had a tryout process which selected the best kids from these two teams along with the other top end talent they have overlooked. At all age levels. I would suspect that could be a team to rival the Blades and Machine any day.
I agree. Neither team holds tryouts at all of the levels. If you haven't solidified a spot on those teams early on you are hard pressed to find opportunities to help your kid develop over the summer outside of driving them long distances to find a team that has tryouts. It's a shame for kids on the outside looking in.

Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:27 pm
by InigoMontoya
Sounds like they believe in developing their kids. Also sounds like an opportunity for another team, so those kids can be inside.

Rival the Machine and Blades?

Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 1:10 pm
by nhockey
The LSS already do. I wish I would had persued the LSS right away. I had my son on the Wings. That program was a joke. They cut my kid because he was to small? The LSS have a small team but focus on team play. They have minimal practice time but really push team play. They have the summer hockey model. Your picked to play for them and you are not cut. You are part of the Stars family and the kids grow together. They teach more than hockey, they are building better people. Our Bulldog team is trying to do the same. There are many more teams up north now and you can find a place for your child to play. Fact is the best players up north want to be Stars first. They do get the pick of the kids they want and the ones that fit the team game. Oh they do miss out a coaches kid here and there but overall they are on top. Bulldogs are pushing to be a team that has the Rep of the Stars not the wings.

Re: Rival the Machine and Blades?

Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:19 pm
by black sheep
nhockey wrote:The LSS already do. I wish I would had persued the LSS right away. The Wings...That program was a joke. They cut my kid because he was to small?

Two problems here...

1.LSS calls ewe, not the other way around.

2.Both of these programs cut parents much more frequently than kids.

Re: Rival the Machine and Blades?

Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 7:59 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
black sheep wrote:
nhockey wrote:The LSS already do. I wish I would had persued the LSS right away. The Wings...That program was a joke. They cut my kid because he was to small?

Two problems here...

1.LSS calls ewe, not the other way around.

2.Both of these programs cut parents much more frequently than kids.
:lol:

cuts

Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 8:31 pm
by gdahl
So if I understand you correctly..???? the Stars and the Wings choose their players based upon the status of their parents????

Re: cuts

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 7:31 am
by black sheep
gdahl wrote:So if I understand you correctly..???? the Stars and the Wings choose their players based upon the status of their parents????

No not at all...they both select players in your traditional fashions...tryouts & recomendations etc...

99% of the time once a player is on the team they are there to stay...both teams promote loyalty and family values...almost to a fault. Both teams would likey improve the w/l over time by having open tryouts every year, but thats not what they are about.

Ewer biggest risk of getting CUT is if you have a nut job parent.

Re: cuts

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 9:49 am
by NSHA Rules
black sheep wrote:
gdahl wrote:So if I understand you correctly..???? the Stars and the Wings choose their players based upon the status of their parents????

No not at all...they both select players in your traditional fashions...tryouts & recomendations etc...

99% of the time once a player is on the team they are there to stay...both teams promote loyalty and family values...almost to a fault. Both teams would likey improve the w/l over time by having open tryouts every year, but thats not what they are about.

Ewer biggest risk of getting CUT is if you have a nut job parent.
Parents are just as important to the success of your team as the kids. A parent can screw up a team dynamic real quickly and that is why you see a coach get rid of a kid based on the parents.

Parents breed dissention among a team more than the kid. At least with the kid the coach can take care of it in the locker room.

Re: cuts

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 2:17 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
NSHA Rules wrote:
black sheep wrote:
gdahl wrote:So if I understand you correctly..???? the Stars and the Wings choose their players based upon the status of their parents????

No not at all...they both select players in your traditional fashions...tryouts & recomendations etc...

99% of the time once a player is on the team they are there to stay...both teams promote loyalty and family values...almost to a fault. Both teams would likey improve the w/l over time by having open tryouts every year, but thats not what they are about.

Ewer biggest risk of getting CUT is if you have a nut job parent.
Parents are just as important to the success of your team as the kids. A parent can screw up a team dynamic real quickly and that is why you see a coach get rid of a kid based on the parents.

Parents breed dissention among a team more than the kid. At least with the kid the coach can take care of it in the locker room.
Interesting.......so will I,um, er.... I mean the NUTBAG parent be recieving a pink slip in the mail? Or is it via email, text, phone call ect.....

Re: cuts

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 6:10 pm
by NSHA Rules
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
NSHA Rules wrote:
black sheep wrote:
No not at all...they both select players in your traditional fashions...tryouts & recomendations etc...

99% of the time once a player is on the team they are there to stay...both teams promote loyalty and family values...almost to a fault. Both teams would likey improve the w/l over time by having open tryouts every year, but thats not what they are about.

Ewer biggest risk of getting CUT is if you have a nut job parent.
Parents are just as important to the success of your team as the kids. A parent can screw up a team dynamic real quickly and that is why you see a coach get rid of a kid based on the parents.

Parents breed dissention among a team more than the kid. At least with the kid the coach can take care of it in the locker room.
Interesting.......so will I,um, er.... I mean the NUTBAG parent be recieving a pink slip in the mail? Or is it via email, text, phone call ect.....
No, Coach will just tell your kids teammates to let him know at school. :twisted: :D

Yo......... nhockey guy!

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 11:15 pm
by northernlaker
You were let go and now your crying in your spilt milk. Get over it and get a life. You coached the bulldogs and had a full roster, then when you played the Wings team you were cut from you loaded up a bunch of pickups and sat your regular bulldog kids. Get a life loser.

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 8:53 am
by getoveryourbadself
InigoMontoya wrote:Sounds like they believe in developing their kids. Also sounds like an opportunity for another team, so those kids can be inside.
Yep....both LSS and the Wings have very good/well respected coaches at the various levels. The northlandhockeygroup has started a couple of new teams up North in the last year, so the landscape appears to be getting better as far as providing an opportunity for everyone who wants to play & improve over the summer.

Re: Yo......... nhockey guy!

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 2:17 pm
by black sheep
northernlaker wrote:You were let go and now your crying in your spilt milk. Get over it and get a life. You coached the bulldogs and had a full roster, then when you played the Wings team you were cut from you loaded up a bunch of pickups and sat your regular bulldog kids. Get a life loser.
ummmm.....so...i guess u and "nhockey" not going out for tea anytime soon??? :shock:

Re: Yo......... nhockey guy!

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 3:35 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
northernlaker wrote:You were let go and now your crying in your spilt milk. Get over it and get a life. You coached the bulldogs and had a full roster, then when you played the Wings team you were cut from you loaded up a bunch of pickups and sat your regular bulldog kids. Get a life loser.
Who won the Spilt Milk Mega Bowl?

Wings or Dogs?

Re: Yo......... nhockey guy!

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 8:32 am
by Benito Juarez
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
northernlaker wrote:You were let go and now your crying in your spilt milk. Get over it and get a life. You coached the bulldogs and had a full roster, then when you played the Wings team you were cut from you loaded up a bunch of pickups and sat your regular bulldog kids. Get a life loser.
Who won the Spilt Milk Mega Bowl?

Wings or Dogs?
I talked with my neighbors brother's second cousin's nephew who knows some kids on both teams and he said the Northern Wings beat the Bulldogs 6-1.

Re: Yo......... nhockey guy!

Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:44 am
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
Benito Juarez wrote:
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
northernlaker wrote:You were let go and now your crying in your spilt milk. Get over it and get a life. You coached the bulldogs and had a full roster, then when you played the Wings team you were cut from you loaded up a bunch of pickups and sat your regular bulldog kids. Get a life loser.
Who won the Spilt Milk Mega Bowl?

Wings or Dogs?
I talked with my neighbors brother's second cousin's nephew who knows some kids on both teams and he said the Northern Wings beat the Bulldogs 6-1.
Muchas Gracias Benito.
:lol:

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:19 pm
by CreaseMonkey
Just found this post and it is quite interesting to see the different perspectives.

I think the Wings and LSS have the two top programs in the North. The Storm, Bulldogs, etc are quite a bit weaker than these teams.

I can only speak for the 97 level, but I find it really sad that the Stars and Wings have only played each other twice over the years. The Wings have always played in the Stars tournament, but the Stars do not enter the Wings tournament. Seems like they are trying to avoid that match up. The Wings have won the Stars tournament and taken 2nd as well, so I think the nod has to go to the Wings at that level.

It would be really simple to settle with a 3 game series some weekend over the summer. Granted both programs draw players from outside the Duluth area, but both programs would likely enjoy and benefit from a series to wrap up the summer season.

Hopefully they get that chance before the core of the teams start going seperate directions.

Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 11:58 am
by NSHA Rules
CreaseMonkey wrote:Just found this post and it is quite interesting to see the different perspectives.

I think the Wings and LSS have the two top programs in the North. The Storm, Bulldogs, etc are quite a bit weaker than these teams.
I can only speak for the 97 level, but I find it really sad that the Stars and Wings have only played each other twice over the years. The Wings have always played in the Stars tournament, but the Stars do not enter the Wings tournament. Seems like they are trying to avoid that match up. The Wings have won the Stars tournament and taken 2nd as well, so I think the nod has to go to the Wings at that level.

It would be really simple to settle with a 3 game series some weekend over the summer. Granted both programs draw players from outside the Duluth area, but both programs would likely enjoy and benefit from a series to wrap up the summer season.

Hopefully they get that chance before the core of the teams start going seperate directions.
I would assume you are talking about the 97 level only. The Stars are tops in the 99 level up North. The 99 Wings have a pretty good team but the Storm beat them 2-0 last year and the Bulldogs are definately a step below the Storm. The 2000 and 2001 Storm teams are looking pretty good as well so I wouldn't put them down in the level of the Bulldogs teams.

I will say that the 99 Wings team this year is better than the Wings team last year.

Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:07 pm
by CreaseMonkey
Yep...just referring to the 97 level.

At different age levels, the Wings, Stars and Storm have gotten the early jump on kids and made solid teams. With those three teams being established, I think the upstarts like the Bulldogs, Gulls, etc have a much more difficult task if their goal is putting together Invite level teams.

The nitch that they can provide is more of a development model where they could practice several days a week and build a base from people who are looknig for that over a more high end competitive model. No doubt the other programs have developed players, but because they draw from such a wide area, having a regular practice schedule is for all intensive purposes impossible.

As far as the 97 level goes, I still give the nod to the Wings. Until they play the Stars though, it is all just personal opinion. I hope they eventually cross paths again.