Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:56 am
by Cobber
Anyone know how the JV game went.

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 4:56 pm
by SPUDNUT
Cobber wrote:Anyone know how the JV game went.


3-1 (eng) Taters

mystery team

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:17 pm
by hipcheck
Rams are a mystery this year. They have moderate talent, and when they put out, they are a contender. When they just show up, they look like a #4 seed at best.

I think the Spuds are in the drivers seat now, and from Tuesdays game, they look good enough to win section 8AA without any trouble.

Re: mystery team

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:09 pm
by HockeyFan1
hipcheck wrote:Rams are a mystery this year. They have moderate talent, and when they put out, they are a contender. When they just show up, they look like a #4 seed at best.

I think the Spuds are in the drivers seat now, and from Tuesdays game, they look good enough to win section 8AA without any trouble.
Right, just like 2007?

Re: mystery team

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:54 pm
by warriors41
HockeyFan1 wrote:
hipcheck wrote:Rams are a mystery this year. They have moderate talent, and when they put out, they are a contender. When they just show up, they look like a #4 seed at best.

I think the Spuds are in the drivers seat now, and from Tuesdays game, they look good enough to win section 8AA without any trouble.
Right, just like 2007?
This year is nothing like 2007. First off, that year the Spuds were #1 for most of the year and the Rams were right behind them at #2. The rams lost 2 games all year and both were to the spuds but they were close losses. With all that said, if both of these teams make the section finals, Ness and Lee and company won't be walking out of locker room to play the game. Both teams are less talented than 2007.

Either way, Bemidji is gonna give Moorhead a lot of trouble in sections. I know its hard to finally say that there is a third team is contention but lets not forget them.

Re: mystery team

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:57 pm
by HockeyFan1
warriors41 wrote:
HockeyFan1 wrote:
hipcheck wrote:Rams are a mystery this year. They have moderate talent, and when they put out, they are a contender. When they just show up, they look like a #4 seed at best.

I think the Spuds are in the drivers seat now, and from Tuesdays game, they look good enough to win section 8AA without any trouble.
Right, just like 2007?
This year is nothing like 2007. First off, that year the Spuds were #1 for most of the year and the Rams were right behind them at #2. The rams lost 2 games all year and both were to the spuds but they were close losses. With all that said, if both of these teams make the section finals, Ness and Lee and company won't be walking out of locker room to play the game. Both teams are less talented than 2007.

Either way, Bemidji is gonna give Moorhead a lot of trouble in sections. I know its hard to finally say that there is a third team is contention but lets not forget them.
My point is, in 2007 the Spuds were the favorite, and weren't expected to have any trouble getting past sections. That's why they play the game!

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:03 am
by Pucklvr
Simply said, Roseau is down this year. It happens! You can't expect them to be a powerhouse every year! I don't think it helped that Roseau had a few key players out but, that is the game. I am not blaming that for their loss. Moorhead was simply the better team that night. Oh, I forgot.... I wouldn't count Roseau out just yet. It seems to me that Roseau is a "Tournament Team." They tend to get things done when they have to!

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:57 pm
by Potatohead9
Pucklvr wrote:Simply said, Roseau is down this year. It happens! You can't expect them to be a powerhouse every year! I don't think it helped that Roseau had a few key players out but, that is the game. I am not blaming that for their loss. Moorhead was simply the better team that night. Oh, I forgot.... I wouldn't count Roseau out just yet. It seems to me that Roseau is a "Tournament Team." They tend to get things done when they have to!
AGREED! Never count out Roseau. Way too much tradition and experience.
I think in Section 8AA seeded teams 1-4 (Bemidji, Moorhead, Roseau, Brainerd, and possibly Tech) theme will be who's HOT and who's NOT..... Having a heathly team would also help.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:53 pm
by warriors41
Potatohead9 wrote:
Pucklvr wrote:Simply said, Roseau is down this year. It happens! You can't expect them to be a powerhouse every year! I don't think it helped that Roseau had a few key players out but, that is the game. I am not blaming that for their loss. Moorhead was simply the better team that night. Oh, I forgot.... I wouldn't count Roseau out just yet. It seems to me that Roseau is a "Tournament Team." They tend to get things done when they have to!
AGREED! Never count out Roseau. Way too much tradition and experience.
I think in Section 8AA seeded teams 1-4 (Bemidji, Moorhead, Roseau, Brainerd, and possibly Tech) theme will be who's HOT and who's NOT..... Having a heathly team would also help.
Tech just beat Roseau 4-2 last night. Makes it even harder to place Roseau. It's hard to imagine them being a 4th or even 5th seed in the section tourny but it might happen this year

Re: mystery team

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:22 pm
by northwoods oldtimer
Right, just like 2007?
Not even close my friend