Page 2 of 3

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:59 pm
by EHSHack
East with a for real PP goal. 4-2 east with 8 to go.

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:59 pm
by east hockey
That one counts. 4-2 on Jake's fourth goal of the night.

Lee

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:01 pm
by east hockey
Cloquet tied 1-1 with Hermantown in the second period. (thanks for the correction, butterball)

Lee

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:02 pm
by butterball5
Hermantown 2
Cloquet 1
After 2

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:03 pm
by EHSHack
east hockey wrote:
EHSHack wrote:Big PP for East coming up here with 954 to go. Randolph uses a timeout. East is getting much better shots on goal this period, they are just snake bit right now
How good a goalie is Crawford for Sup-town?

Lee
He looks really good at times

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:04 pm
by east hockey
Marshall working over Denfeld 4-0 midway thru the 2nd.

Lee

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:05 pm
by EHSHack
Refs miss a huge checking from behind which should have been a DQ. Instead east gets 2 for boarding.

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:10 pm
by EHSHack
4-3 east with 1:02 to play.

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:12 pm
by EHSHack
Final

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:12 pm
by east hockey
Jesus. 4-3 final for East. Ugly, ugly win.

Lee

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:13 pm
by mnmouth
Shots 45-19 in favor of the Hounds.

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:14 pm
by karl(east)
That was pretty brutal. No injured player excuse to use this time, either.

The defense and goaltending is the primary concern coming out of this one, but they also need players not named Jake Randolph to score. That second line needs to get going again.

Props to Superior for taking the fight to the Hounds. On to Blaine.

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:16 pm
by east hockey
karl(east) wrote:That was pretty brutal. No injured player excuse to use this time, either.

The defense and goaltending is the primary concern coming out of this one, but they also need players not named Jake Randolph to score. That second line needs to get going again.

Props to Superior for taking the fight to the Hounds. On to Blaine.
As has been the case too many times this season.

Lee

HM - Richfield

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:51 pm
by stpaul
Hill-Murray 16, Richfield 2
Richfield won the 3rd period 2-1

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:54 pm
by HockeyWatcher10
White Bear 4-2 over East Ridge

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:57 pm
by Big Daddy
HockeyWatcher10 wrote:White Bear 4-2 over East Ridge
The fourth goal was an empty net in the last minute of the game. Much closer than the 4-2 score sounds. WBL had 2 major penalties. Could've/should've had at least 2 more. It was not a gimme game for 'da Bears by any means....

Re: HM - Richfield

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:04 pm
by HockeyWatcher10
stpaul wrote:Hill-Murray 16, Richfield 2
Richfield won the 3rd period 2-1
Sounds like another game where Hill players make their stats look better by playing bad teams!

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:09 pm
by HappyHockeyFan
Eagan 9 Applevalley 2

Re: HM - Richfield

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:10 pm
by HappyHockeyFan
HockeyWatcher10 wrote:
stpaul wrote:Hill-Murray 16, Richfield 2
Richfield won the 3rd period 2-1
Sounds like another game where Hill players make their stats look better by playing bad teams!
It was a conference game dork, they had to play them.

Re: HM - Richfield

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:20 pm
by trippedovertheblueline
HockeyWatcher10 wrote:
stpaul wrote:Hill-Murray 16, Richfield 2
Richfield won the 3rd period 2-1
Sounds like another game where Hill players make their stats look better by playing bad teams!
Richfield won the 3rd period. Respect shown by Hill. Look at the 9th goal by Eagan with 2 minutes to go up by 6. That is padding the stats.

Re: HM - Richfield

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:24 pm
by HappyHockeyFan
trippedovertheblueline wrote:
HockeyWatcher10 wrote:
stpaul wrote:Hill-Murray 16, Richfield 2
Richfield won the 3rd period 2-1
Sounds like another game where Hill players make their stats look better by playing bad teams!
Richfield won the 3rd period. Respect shown by Hill. Look at the 9th goal by Eagan with 2 minutes to go up by 6. That is padding the stats.
Thats right, pad those stats, got no problem with that, beats being disrespectful and laying back.

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:28 pm
by blindref
EHSHack wrote:Refs miss a huge checking from behind which should have been a DQ. Instead east gets 2 for boarding.
There is no longer a two available for boarding, only five.

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:30 pm
by EHSHack
Game was in Wisconsin

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:32 pm
by HShockeywatcher
blindref wrote:
EHSHack wrote:Refs miss a huge checking from behind which should have been a DQ. Instead east gets 2 for boarding.
There is no longer a two available for boarding, only five.
Edina player got 2 for elbowing for an elbowing to the head as well...

Re: HM - Richfield

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:22 pm
by almostashappy
trippedovertheblueline wrote:
HockeyWatcher10 wrote:
stpaul wrote:Hill-Murray 16, Richfield 2
Richfield won the 3rd period 2-1
Sounds like another game where Hill players make their stats look better by playing bad teams!
Richfield won the 3rd period. Respect shown by Hill. Look at the 9th goal by Eagan with 2 minutes to go up by 6. That is padding the stats.
Last two Eagan goals were on PP. Fourth line was on ice more than the first three during running time. Nothing to see here, move along.