HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

crw wrote:as much as i think any one of the the D6 teams can compete for the state championship i think its a joke that D6 and D9 each get 4 births. i bet if you ask a team that lost out because their district only got 2 bids if their 3rd team would travel they would say yes.....i know i will get ripped for this but really???

SuperStar wrote:There are 4 seeds from D6 going to regions. EP, Edina, PL and burnsville..These games now are a formality

D6 and D9 each got an additional seed from D4 (this year only) because D4 had only one Bantam A team. It was a fluke and won't happen again.

Bluewhitefan wrote:

crw wrote:as much as i think any one of the the D6 teams can compete for the state championship i think its a joke that D6 and D9 each get 4 births. i bet if you ask a team that lost out because their district only got 2 bids if their 3rd team would travel they would say yes.....i know i will get ripped for this but really???

SuperStar wrote:There are 4 seeds from D6 going to regions. EP, Edina, PL and burnsville..These games now are a formality

D6 and D9 each got an additional seed from D4 (this year only) because D4 had only one Bantam A team. It was a fluke and won't happen again.

Last year at the Bantam A level D4, D8. D9 made up the South Region. D4 only had 1 Bantam Team Luverne, they took 1 of 2 D4 Spots. The other D4 spot went to D8 giving them 4 seeds..... This year was not a fluke, D4 does not have the teams at the Bantam level. Evey year what ever Region D4 is assigned to will have non -Std seeds.

Next Year the South Region is made up of D4, D9 and D5... D4 is supposed to send 3 teams. If they only field 1 Bantam A team again you have the same situation as this and last year, the other Regions picking up spots.

ok, thanks for clearing up

EP 4
Burnsville 0

EP wins the D6 championship.

And by the way crw, don't complain about D6 getting 4 teams in regions. D6 has the toughest district in the state. Their 4 seed is better than many 1 seeds. The regions are stronger four sending more d6 teams.

gorilla1 wrote:And by the way crw, don't complain about D6 getting 4 teams in regions. D6 has the toughest district in the state. Their 4 seed is better than many 1 seeds. The regions are stronger four sending more d6 teams.

I always love that one!

I believe I implied that in my original message...

I Didn't understand why they did and someone politely explained it, which I thanked them for doing..

gorilla1 wrote:And by the way crw, don't complain about D6 getting 4 teams in regions. D6 has the toughest district in the state. Their 4 seed is better than many 1 seeds. The regions are stronger four sending more d6 teams.

CRW might be just upset that he is in that region and has no shot at state.

not in that region..

Towelie wrote:CRW might be just upset that he is in that region and has no shot at state.

Does anyone know what the scores were tonight from D3, D8 and D10??

District 8

Farmington - 5
Lakeville North - 0

District 3

OMG - 6
Hopkins - 0

crw wrote:Does anyone know what the scores were tonight from D3, D8 and D10??

http://district10hockey.org/PDF/bantama.pdf

only scores I don't see anywhere are Centennial vs Blaine and the Rosemount vs Woodbury...

puckhead58 wrote:

crw wrote:Does anyone know what the scores were tonight from D3, D8 and D10??

http://district10hockey.org/PDF/bantama.pdf

Centennial 3. Blaine. 2

Centennial won...not sure on score

Rosemount beat Woodbury, not sure of score

Rosemount 3
Woodbury 2

Games are done and brackets are set... Let the fun begin,,

Good luck to all teams that advanced..

So I take it that the Woodbury coaches didn't throw their hats on the ice since they only scored 2 goals in the game today?????

Hockey guy1486 Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:14 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So I take it that the Woodbury coaches didn't throw their hats on the ice since they only scored 2 goals in the game today?????



Not this time Not sure if it's true, but somebody told me the same kid scored the two goals in this game.

I don't know how there earlier matchups were but Rosemount looked better in this game. [/quote]

observer wrote:Farmington 3 Sibley 0

What up Sibley? All those amazing Bantam A players we've been reading about. All the amazing former fire players. Shutout by a lower ranked Farmington team?

Sibley was extremely overrated, they might of had 2 good players. Too bad they couldnt follow through with all their "superstars'