Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:31 pm
Oh man, Bergland has a nice Minnesoootan accent from up nort dere dontcha know?
Huh, expected more out of Thief.
Anyone else think the video could be better???
HighSchoolHockeyForums.com
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
State A Quarterfinal: New Ulm vs [4] Thief River Falls
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:33 pm
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:36 pm
Right now only thing keeping New Ulm in this one is their goalie.
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:39 pm
SOG 19-7
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:45 pm
Anyone else think those bicycle helmets TRF is sporting are awful?
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:56 pm
Score?
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:58 pm
4-1 TRF, mid-2nd.bronco2828 wrote:Score?
We just had a "216" chant at the X...sounds like they're already prepping for tomorrow night.
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:58 pm
4-1 TRFbronco2828 wrote:Score?
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:12 pm
5-1 after 2. I'm checking out--time to go rest up for some (hopefully) more competitive games tomorrow.
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:13 pm
Yes another sleepfest. Today was almost as bad as the girls "A" quarters.karl(east) wrote:5-1 after 2. I'm checking out--time to go rest up for some (hopefully) more competitive games tomorrow.
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:40 pm
I honestly didn't like the ruling on that. In my book, that was a very nice glove save. Do the pros have that very same rule - where even if the puck is caught behind the line it's still ruled a goal??karl(east) wrote:Our first use of video replay in a while, and they overturn the call and get it right. Nice job by the replay crew.
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:50 pm
Wow. I literally fell asleep.
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:05 am
I haven't checked the rulebook, but I assume so. The puck crossed the goal line and then entered the goalie's glove. It's roughly the same as knocking the puck out of the net after it's already gone in. I also thought the replays were pretty clear.Weekend_Warrior wrote:I honestly didn't like the ruling on that. In my book, that was a very nice glove save. Do the pros have that very same rule - where even if the puck is caught behind the line it's still ruled a goal??karl(east) wrote:Our first use of video replay in a while, and they overturn the call and get it right. Nice job by the replay crew.
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:06 am
That glove save review was the most interesting that happened in the 4 sleepers I watched today.Weekend_Warrior wrote:I honestly didn't like the ruling on that. In my book, that was a very nice glove save. Do the pros have that very same rule - where even if the puck is caught behind the line it's still ruled a goal??karl(east) wrote:Our first use of video replay in a while, and they overturn the call and get it right. Nice job by the replay crew.
Clearly a goal after seeing the review.
I thought the 4 winning teams today played down to the competition a bit. The Prowlers will need to be much better Friday and I think the Mustangs will need to be sharper also.
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:25 am
The " Let's go Eagles " chant followed by " We're just kidding " was hilarious after the "216" crew had been cheering for the Prowlers for most of two periods.karl(east) wrote:4-1 TRF, mid-2nd.bronco2828 wrote:Score?
We just had a "216" chant at the X...sounds like they're already prepping for tomorrow night.
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:30 am
The " Let's go Eagles " chant followed by " We're just kidding " was hilarious after the "216" crew had been cheering for the Prowlers for most of two periods.karl(east) wrote:4-1 TRF, mid-2nd.bronco2828 wrote:Score?
We just had a "216" chant at the X...sounds like they're already prepping for tomorrow night.