HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Major props to Randolph for finding a way to win against a very hot goalie. Good fight by Cambridge.

3-3 bemidji and Grand Rapids
I think it is going to OT, but radio announcer not very good .

Sog somthing like 30 15 for bemidji

4-3 grand rapids in ot over bemidji

Marshall 8-1 Worthington when I left with 4 1/2 minutes to go.

TRF 3 Roseau 0
Did not see game but my brother said it looks like
if TRF can keep the puck to the outside and allows
their goalie to see the puck it will be tough to get
it by him.

Forest lake 8- St. Francis 2

east hockey wrote:Edina putting the hurt to Centennial 6-1 in the 3rd period.

Lee

Was it really 5 SHG for Edina in this one?? Should Centennial decline the penalty?

Alexandria 7, Little Falls 1. Shots on goal were 44-5 for Alexandria!

C-dad wrote:Was it really 5 SHG for Edina in this one?? Should Centennial decline the penalty?

Or at the very least go into a "prevent defense" and try to keep it scoreless.

C-dad wrote:

east hockey wrote:Edina putting the hurt to Centennial 6-1 in the 3rd period.

Lee

Was it really 5 SHG for Edina in this one?? Should Centennial decline the penalty?

Looking at the times of Edina's penalties and when they scored, only one of their goals was short-handed. Whoever put the "shorthanded" designation on the other four apparently got it wrong.

http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/game/show/54 ... rer=889220

Lee

east hockey wrote:

C-dad wrote:

east hockey wrote:Edina putting the hurt to Centennial 6-1 in the 3rd period.

Lee

Was it really 5 SHG for Edina in this one?? Should Centennial decline the penalty?

Looking at the times of Edina's penalties and when they scored, only one of their goals was short-handed. Whoever put the "shorthanded" designation on the other four apparently got it wrong.

http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/game/show/54 ... rer=889220

Lee

I heard back from an Edina dad that two goals were SHG. He could have gotten that wrong though.

ETA: Looks like Lee is right, only one was short and one may have been 4 on 4.

It's going to be a long season for Roseau unless the first line can learn to play team hockey instead of individual hockey. It's tough to play 3 on 5 hockey with your first line the whole game, meaning Roseau plays with 2 defensemen and 3 lone rangers. Most teams have figured out, when they play Roseau, they can put 2-3 players on any of the first line forwards when they have the puck because they know they're not going to pass.

Roseau Fan wrote:It's going to be a long season for Roseau unless the first line can learn to play team hockey instead of individual hockey. It's tough to play 3 on 5 hockey with your first line the whole game, meaning Roseau plays with 2 defensemen and 3 lone rangers. Most teams have figured out, when they play Roseau, they can put 2-3 players on any of the first line forwards when they have the puck because they know they're not going to pass.

That's too bad as they have some very talented seniors.
I suppose they are all looking for the UofM or UND scholarship?

Didn't this group win a PeeWee A and VFW state championship?

Roseau Fan wrote:It's going to be a long season for Roseau unless the first line can learn to play team hockey instead of individual hockey. It's tough to play 3 on 5 hockey with your first line the whole game, meaning Roseau plays with 2 defensemen and 3 lone rangers. Most teams have figured out, when they play Roseau, they can put 2-3 players on any of the first line forwards when they have the puck because they know they're not going to pass.

Need more than one line to go anywhere anyway, plus, Roseau is weak in defense this year.

northfan wrote:Didn't this group win a PeeWee A and VFW state championship?

Yeah, but lots of things change in that many years, for most any team.

Only really relevant at the time.