Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 8:20 am
I think a good way to figure out NAHL vs USHL is going through each D1 rooster..I will do that in the next couple days and find out who's is from where and what league..Should give us a good starting point..It will be tedious, but I am down for it.The Exiled One wrote:I agree that there are kids currently without scholies that will eventually earn scholies omitted from that number, but the same holds true for the 138 USHL players without scholies. In other words, it doesn't work as a stand alone metric, but it still works as a comparative metric.O-townClown wrote:I haven't been reading close enough to scrutinize the math, but I think you are missing a ton of kids that are NCAA players.
The number isn't:
Commits as of now/Players rostered in a year
It is:
Commits today and also years forward/Players rostered in a year
It takes some time to determine what happens to that player pool of 700+ kids. You can't measure it accurately today.
Just to be clear, I still think the NAHL is a fine league, and there is definitely some overlap with the USHL on an individual player basis, but the league on whole is clearly not on the same level. Good league though.