Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:58 pm
The Wolfman is on a roll...
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
I wonder if the students cared enough before this news to attend the games in large numbers...Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:'CCO reporting student protest on campus this morning? That's kind of amazing that the non-hockey student body is invested in this decision.
It might be a terrible argument against replacing her, but it's not a terrible argument against the fact that she was waaaaay overpaid.Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:Yes we can all agree women's hockey is not the cash cow a men's program may be. But almost every athletic program (at UMD or anywhere else) is not making money! They exist for a host of other reasons. Honestly, other than maybe football, basketball, hockey (all men's of course) which other college sports make $$? That's a terrible argument against the decision to replace this coach.
Great question NTMH.Which other coaches and teams face cutbacks?
Not hardly.Nevertoomuchhockey wrote: Let the lawsuits commence.
Not hardly? Every interview Shannon has given has the words "my attorney" in it! Not taking sides, I think Shannon got the shaft and it was handled poorly. In addition, the timing (Mid Season and finals week) was about as unprofessional as I've seen.nu2hockey wrote:Not hardly.Nevertoomuchhockey wrote: Let the lawsuits commence.
I hope the players can refocus at UMD and continue playing well after the semester break.
Also, why have the " self-appointed" forum moderators not chimed in to get this thread moved to the college forum?
You think she's going to sue them for "mishandling" how they decided not to renew her contract? Everyone talks about suing when they get fired, it's human nature. Then they realize they have nothing to sue over and just go away.36Guy wrote:Not hardly? Every interview Shannon has given has the words "my attorney" in it! Not taking sides, I think Shannon got the shaft and it was handled poorly. In addition, the timing (Mid Season and finals week) was about as unprofessional as I've seen.nu2hockey wrote:Not hardly.Nevertoomuchhockey wrote: Let the lawsuits commence.
I hope the players can refocus at UMD and continue playing well after the semester break.
Also, why have the " self-appointed" forum moderators not chimed in to get this thread moved to the college forum?
My read on NTMH's post is that it relates less to her personal situation, and more to the Title IX issues that would arise from dropping an opportunity for women.Froggy Richards wrote:You think she's going to sue them for "mishandling" how they decided not to renew her contract? Everyone talks about suing when they get fired, it's human nature. Then they realize they have nothing to sue over and just go away.36Guy wrote:Not hardly? Every interview Shannon has given has the words "my attorney" in it! Not taking sides, I think Shannon got the shaft and it was handled poorly. In addition, the timing (Mid Season and finals week) was about as unprofessional as I've seen.nu2hockey wrote: Not hardly.
I hope the players can refocus at UMD and continue playing well after the semester break.
Also, why have the " self-appointed" forum moderators not chimed in to get this thread moved to the college forum?
Correct...Bottom line is $$! So many qualified candidates (with a little different style) as assistants within the WCHA that could could be hired at less than half of what she is currently paid. Program could use a shot in the arm and Coach Fabian, Schuler, Johnson or the recently fired from UMD..McDonald would be a great place to start.JohnnyBuck wrote:Sounds like the timing had to do with a 6 month notice in her contract. This is the reason they informed her now. This way they can work on a replacement at the end of the season, otherwise they would have had to wait until sometime this summer.
I can't vouch for its accuracy, but this comment was recently posted in the USCHO Women's Forum:observer wrote:No one has mentioned her recruiting budget. Have to believe she took a few trips to Europe each year instead of down to the metro.
This would explain a lot of things.MNHockeyFan wrote:I can't vouch for its accuracy, but this comment was recently posted in the USCHO Women's Forum:observer wrote:No one has mentioned her recruiting budget. Have to believe she took a few trips to Europe each year instead of down to the metro.
"For those referring to the lack of recruitment of European players by Coach Miller, it is widely known that the recruiting budget and overall budget was drastically slashed when Chancellor Martin retired. There is also an extreme lack of cooperation in the admissions department getting the European players the tools they need to be accepted into the school. For multiple kids to miss passing their writing test by ONE point and the university forcing them to wait an entire year instead of coming up with a solution shows a lack of interest in women's hockey by the administration. One of the reasons this years freshman class is so large is because a few of those players were supposed to join the team last year but could not because of test scores."
If this is accurate, then apparently Coach Miller hasn't been able to take as many recruiting trips to Europe as was previously the case, which may in part explain the drop in the talent level of some of her recruits as well as the difficulty some of them have had getting accepted by the school's admissions department. It also sounds like she had a special relationship with the previous chancellor (Kathryn Martin), one that no longer exists with the new chancellor (Lendley Black).