HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

whose all conference?

My top 15 players no specific order:

Jensen (R)
Gaughan (B)
Scat (R)
Meyer (B)
Marty (B)
Sands (CI)
Mitchell (M)
Klitze (M)
Zitur (B)
Robertson (P)
Varness (STMA)
Leaf (B)
Provo (R)
Potgotchik (M)
Blaisdell (B)

Looks good to me.

They're baaaaaaaaaack.

EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:They're baaaaaaaaaack.

would love to see CNT's picks

how do teams determine all conference, do some teams get more because they are higher rank in the confence

ovechkinrules wrote:how do teams determine all conference, do some teams get more because they are higher rank in the confence

No idea really..if that is the case then Buffalo and Rogers should get alot since both were undeatfeated against the others...

Coaches vote on them at the conference meetings held in February. They all pick players from their teams and then it is dwindled down to the final team.

HOFam'r wrote:

EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:They're baaaaaaaaaack.

would love to see CNT's picks

I'll let the coaches pick em.

But I agree that it should be dominated by Buffalo and Rogers.

On your picks, I think they are OK for the rest of the conf. but 3 from Monty, and then only 3 from Rogers? and then 6 for Buffalo?

As for Rogers, only the one pick is obvious, and there are a few others on the Rogers team I would look.
But that's IMO and I'll leave it at that.

Can't Never Tried wrote:

HOFam'r wrote:

EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:They're baaaaaaaaaack.

would love to see CNT's picks

I'll let the coaches pick em.

But I agree that it should be dominated by Buffalo and Rogers.

On your picks, I think they are OK for the rest of the conf. but 3 from Monty, and then only 3 from Rogers? and then 6 for Buffalo?

As for Rogers, only the one pick is obvious, and there are a few others on the Rogers team I would look.
But that's IMO and I'll leave it at that.

Just a guess . . . but I'd bet there is some numerical value placed with a teams standing in the conference:

Buffalo - 5 players
Rogers - 4 players
Princeton/Cambridge - 2 or 3 players
MAML, STMA, BBL - 1 or 2 out of the three teams.

Puckguy19 wrote:

Can't Never Tried wrote:

HOFam'r wrote: would love to see CNT's picks

I'll let the coaches pick em.

But I agree that it should be dominated by Buffalo and Rogers.

On your picks, I think they are OK for the rest of the conf. but 3 from Monty, and then only 3 from Rogers? and then 6 for Buffalo?

As for Rogers, only the one pick is obvious, and there are a few others on the Rogers team I would look.
But that's IMO and I'll leave it at that.

Just a guess . . . but I'd bet there is some numerical value placed with a teams standing in the conference:

Buffalo - 5 players
Rogers - 4 players
Princeton/Cambridge - 2 or 3 players
MAML, STMA, BBL - 1 or 2 out of the three teams.

If this is true than:

Buffalo: Zitur, Gaughan, Marty, Blaisdell, Marty
Rogers: Jensen, Scat, Provo, Goalie (Not sure about provo just know he scores against Bison)
CI: Sands
Maml: Kiltzke, Mitchell
STMA: Varness
Princeton: Robertson
BBL: No One

Just a guess . . . but I'd bet there is some numerical value placed with a teams standing in the conference:

Buffalo - 5 players
Rogers - 4 players
Princeton/Cambridge - 2 or 3 players
MAML, STMA, BBL - 1 or 2 out of the three teams.

stma is 3rd in the conference, so they would get more than 1

HOFam'r wrote:

Puckguy19 wrote:

Can't Never Tried wrote: I'll let the coaches pick em.

But I agree that it should be dominated by Buffalo and Rogers.

On your picks, I think they are OK for the rest of the conf. but 3 from Monty, and then only 3 from Rogers? and then 6 for Buffalo?

As for Rogers, only the one pick is obvious, and there are a few others on the Rogers team I would look.
But that's IMO and I'll leave it at that.

Just a guess . . . but I'd bet there is some numerical value placed with a teams standing in the conference:

Buffalo - 5 players
Rogers - 4 players
Princeton/Cambridge - 2 or 3 players
MAML, STMA, BBL - 1 or 2 out of the three teams.

If this is true than:

Buffalo: Zitur, Gaughan, Marty, Blaisdell, Marty
Rogers: Jensen, Scat, Provo, Goalie (Not sure about provo just know he scores against Bison)
CI: Sands
Maml: Kiltzke, Mitchell
STMA: Varness
Princeton: Robertson
BBL: No One

No Rogers Goalie they've rotated them thru, and IMO not one would deserve it more then another.

Meant Meyer...not 2 Marty's

Well Rogers has not given up a lot of goals in conference this year and it isn't because of goal tending so I would have to say that another D should get the nod Wold or Audette. Might have to lean with Wold since he has been with the team since he was an 8th grader.

Kind of disappointing last night.
Rogers plays Osseo to 0-1 in the 1st period, then give up 4 goals in 9 shots in the second, including a short handed goal, and played 0-0 in the 3rd.
Rogers out shot them 35-23. and lose 5-0 ?
Osseo's goalie played very well.
It really didn't feel like 35 shots, IMHO the Rogers forecheck has to get tough and improve, some of these guys have to stop worrying about getting hit it's part of the game!

Can't Never Tried wrote:Kind of disappointing last night.
Rogers plays Osseo to 0-1 in the 1st period, then give up 4 goals in 9 shots in the second, including a short handed goal, and played 0-0 in the 3rd.
Rogers out shot them 35-23. and lose 5-0 ?
Osseo's goalie played very well.
It really didn't feel like 35 shots, IMHO the Rogers forecheck has to get tough and improve, some of these guys have to stop worrying about getting hit it's part of the game!

Welcome to Section 5AA. This is the NWSC, not the Mississippi Ate!

Osseo is a very good team!

Neutron 14 wrote:

Can't Never Tried wrote:Kind of disappointing last night.
Rogers plays Osseo to 0-1 in the 1st period, then give up 4 goals in 9 shots in the second, including a short handed goal, and played 0-0 in the 3rd.
Rogers out shot them 35-23. and lose 5-0 ?
Osseo's goalie played very well.
It really didn't feel like 35 shots, IMHO the Rogers forecheck has to get tough and improve, some of these guys have to stop worrying about getting hit it's part of the game!

Welcome to Section 5AA. This is the NWSC, not the Mississippi Ate!

Osseo is a very good team!

Yes I know Neut, your Cougar coach was there scouting too! I'm sure it was to get a good look at Rogers

I would rather see Rogers play these better teams any day.

Can't Never Tried wrote: Yes I know Neut, your Cougar coach was there scouting too! I'm sure it was to get a good look at Rogers

I'm sure you'd rather have him seed your team based on what he reads on here...

Neutron 14 wrote:

Can't Never Tried wrote: Yes I know Neut, your Cougar coach was there scouting too! I'm sure it was to get a good look at Rogers

I'm sure you'd rather have him seed your team based on what he reads on here...

I would now !

Neutron 14 wrote:

Can't Never Tried wrote:Kind of disappointing last night.
Rogers plays Osseo to 0-1 in the 1st period, then give up 4 goals in 9 shots in the second, including a short handed goal, and played 0-0 in the 3rd.
Rogers out shot them 35-23. and lose 5-0 ?
Osseo's goalie played very well.
It really didn't feel like 35 shots, IMHO the Rogers forecheck has to get tough and improve, some of these guys have to stop worrying about getting hit it's part of the game!

Welcome to Section 5AA. This is the NWSC, not the Mississippi Ate!

Osseo is a very good team!

Two Problems:

23 shots = 5 opposing goals
35 shots = 0 goals for

Would have to say...Osseo get quality chances...Rogers doesn't...What were the PP numbers?

HOFam'r wrote:

Neutron 14 wrote:

Can't Never Tried wrote:Kind of disappointing last night.
Rogers plays Osseo to 0-1 in the 1st period, then give up 4 goals in 9 shots in the second, including a short handed goal, and played 0-0 in the 3rd.
Rogers out shot them 35-23. and lose 5-0 ?
Osseo's goalie played very well.
It really didn't feel like 35 shots, IMHO the Rogers forecheck has to get tough and improve, some of these guys have to stop worrying about getting hit it's part of the game!

Welcome to Section 5AA. This is the NWSC, not the Mississippi Ate!

Osseo is a very good team!

Two Problems:

23 shots = 5 opposing goals
35 shots = 0 goals for

Would have to say...Osseo get quality chances...Rogers doesn't...What were the PP numbers?

But here's the game sheet.
http://www.pointstreak.com/players/game ... eid=618269

ok CNT i dont know where your getting your information from but when was the last time that Rogers rotated there goalies??? The goalie that has been playing has been that heskin kid. I believe that rogers played Hopkins 0-1 into late in the 3rd period!!!?? So how can that you say their goalie just recieve any credit he gave them a shot to win???

hockeyfan16 wrote:ok CNT i dont know where your getting your information from but when was the last time that Rogers rotated there goalies??? The goalie that has been playing has been that heskin kid. I believe that rogers played Hopkins 0-1 into late in the 3rd period!!!?? So how can that you say their goalie just recieve any credit he gave them a shot to win???

Well lets see here...
the Sr has played in 13 games, 2 being split to replace the Jr 1 time and the Soph the 2nd.

The Jr has played in 8 games being replaced by the Sr once and the Soph once.

The Soph has played in 5 games replacing the jr once. and did a fine job coming in against Tonka.

Sounds like everyone has got their shot to me

Can't Never Tried wrote:

hockeyfan16 wrote:ok CNT i dont know where your getting your information from but when was the last time that Rogers rotated there goalies??? The goalie that has been playing has been that heskin kid. I believe that rogers played Hopkins 0-1 into late in the 3rd period!!!?? So how can that you say their goalie just recieve any credit he gave them a shot to win???

Well lets see here...
the Sr has played in 13 games, 2 being split to replace the Jr 1 time and the Soph the 2nd.

The Jr has played in 8 games being replaced by the Sr once and the Soph once.

The Soph has played in 5 games replacing the jr once. and did a fine job coming in against Tonka.

Sounds like everyone has got their shot to me

Oh yeah one other thing!
If your gonna call me out on my stance with the goalies, back it up with some info that I can gain a perspective on.
My comments were in regards to an All Conference (player) Goalie, I'm sorry your son is obviously not getting the call, and even if he is....IMO Rogers does not have an All conference goalie this year.
Shut outs against Cambridge, Monty, Princeton, and BBL aren't proving anything.


Nice 1st post !

So the one goal-tender that is up for all conference has yet to be pulled?!! yes the other two have played but they haven't been rotating since at least December! The younger goalies have played against tonka but i believe the jr was pulled after the first period and tha soph did a good job. The soph also played against buffalo(nice Job), but besides that look at the teams that the other goalies have played the weaker of the conference the only reason why the jr has good stats is because he has a shut out against BBL and Princeton? Werent you just saying how Princeton wasn't that great? Look at the strength of the teams?