Page 12 of 27

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:55 pm
by bodangles8
why do they play high school teams that our pewees can beat?? marshall just plays PLEASE BAN ME ass teams with no V cuts and that makes them look good..

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:04 pm
by powerplay009
why do they play high school teams that our pewees can beat?? marshall just plays PLEASE BAN ME ass teams with no V cuts and that makes them look good..
Or they have to play them because they are in thier conference not really a choice Marshall has. And sregit why should you feel sorry for a team because you are better than they are? not Marshalls fault and they also showed a lot of class even compliments from the officals on that, it looks worse if you pass up open nets.

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:01 pm
by h20
17-2 and showed alot of class by not running up the score, Jeez the coach must have been watching Belichek and the New England Patriots to see how not to run up a score, there is an saying that goes like this " what goes around will come around" someday those will be on the side and then we will have to listen to that, and if you think Marshall is as good as you say they just may get it March, Just come on board and wine about it then,,, ooooopppsss ya got to get there first

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:10 pm
by stanryckman
if you weren't at the game then don't comment on it. no class would have been NOT playing the 2nd period run time. im sure if marshall makes it in march and gets blasted at the state tourney, they probably wont care. would you h20? you probably got cut from your hs team.

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:41 pm
by Mr. Hockey
Wow a 17-2 win! Lets just crown them now. I did some unofficial looking at strength of schedules of the top 5 teams in the mighty section 3A. Here is how it stacks up as of this morning.

Willmar's Opponents: 124-114-7
Litchfield's Opponents 106-106-6
Hutchinson's Opponents 109-118-5
New Ulm's Opponents 81-86-7
Marshall's Opponents 76-109-5

When it comes down to it, this section is wide open, Hutchinson is playing decent hockey but has Red Wing and New Prauge, Litchfield is really struggling now and has some tough games including St. Cloud Cathedral, Willmar has won 2 in a row, but has two tough conference games against Little Falls and Alexandria, New Ulm has some winnable games coming up including and interesting game against a Central Lakes School, Sartell, and Marshall actually will play Albert Lea 13-3 but also has Austin 1-13 and Windom 7-8.
In conclusion, the section champ will be one of these 5, the others are far back. I am predicting a Willmar-Hutchinson matchup in the 3A final with Hutchinson winning and moving on to the X-cel and play against one of the top 4 seeded teams. :D

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:13 pm
by stanryckman
wow, since mr.hockey predicted it, we better crown Hutch the section 3 champs.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:26 am
by RLStars
Mr. Hockey wrote: Willmar has won 2 in a row, but has two tough conference games against Little Falls and Alexandria
2 in a row, name them?

They'll be lucky to win 2 out of their last six games and they are all conference games.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:32 am
by RLStars
sick_dangles08 wrote:It was run time for the 2nd and 3rd period and marshalls top 2 lines were split up, the score could have easily gotten up to 30. I thought marshall showed a lot of class.
Run time does not start until the third period with a six gaol lead. Pay attention. I watched Cathedral beat a team this year 13-0. The first line did not play after half way through the second period. They chose not to play so the third and fourth lines could get some ice. Now thats class.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:45 am
by sick_dangles08
The Marshall team showed class by ALLOWING run time in the 2nd period, so dont say anything if you weren't there. Their first and second lines were divided up so they maybe got 1 or 2 shifts the 2nd and 3rd periods. Another thing that i don't understand is that when marshall plays teams like this if it is a close game they get ripped on.. and now that they blow a team out their "running up the score" what exactly are they supposed to do?

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:49 am
by show_timer39
RLStars wrote:
sick_dangles08 wrote:It was run time for the 2nd and 3rd period and marshalls top 2 lines were split up, the score could have easily gotten up to 30. I thought marshall showed a lot of class.
Run time does not start until the third period with a six gaol lead. Pay attention. I watched Cathedral beat a team this year 13-0. The first line did not play after half way through the second period. They chose not to play so the third and fourth lines could get some ice. Now thats class.
Once again don't comment on the game unless you were there.. There was running time the 2nd period because both teams agreed on it. Marshall could have easily said no and scored about 10 or more goals that period. Pay attention.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:00 am
by RLStars
I seeeeeeeee, I didn't know two teams could decide on their own to change the rules. Interesting.

Maybe they should have went on a 17 minute penalty kill, or did they decide to shorten the period length too. :shock:

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:02 am
by h20
17-2 ,, the one who has control over this is the coach, he sets the tone, if the players dont respond they get benched, so its running time in the second what the H--- happened in the first to get it that way , this is when it should have been stopped, why even play the first two lines at all, dont they have any other players , has Marshall played Sleepy Eye before, did they not know what they have, maybe dress alot more Jv kids, it all comes down to the coach here, and it does not show any class, PERIOD , NO MORE EXCUSSES

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:19 am
by davey
h20 wrote:17-2 ,, the one who has control over this is the coach, he sets the tone, if the players dont respond they get benched, so its running time in the second what the H--- happened in the first to get it that way , this is when it should have been stopped, why even play the first two lines at all, dont they have any other players , has Marshall played Sleepy Eye before, did they not know what they have, maybe dress alot more Jv kids, it all comes down to the coach here, and it does not show any class, PERIOD , NO MORE EXCUSSES
I'm wondering how Marshall gave up 2. Hey its not often a team from Marshall gets to run up the score...cut them some slack. :lol: :wink:

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:36 am
by powerplay009
It was 10-1 after the first period the other coach asked the officials if it would be ok to start running the clock and Marshall agreed. Marshall top 2 lines got 3 shifts in the last 2 periods, what should you tell them stop playing hard develop bad habits? It's no their fault for being better and why should you feel sorry for someone if your better, Sleepy Eye is lucky it was 17 and not 30.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:25 pm
by Mr. Hockey
RLStars wrote:
Mr. Hockey wrote: Willmar has won 2 in a row, but has two tough conference games against Little Falls and Alexandria
2 in a row, name them?

They'll be lucky to win 2 out of their last six games and they are all conference games.
My apologies "RL Stars" I should have said "won 2 of the last 3"! You are correct they have 6 left and most likely losses to Tech, Little Falls, maybe's against Alex, Sauk Rapids, & Apollo, but the game against River Lakes is very winnable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Saturday 1/19

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:52 pm
by Mr. Hockey
I see that both Litchfield and New Ulm lost last night to non section teams.

Winona 3 New Ulm 1
Delano 5 LDC 4 OT

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:27 pm
by stanryckman
are you still bitter h20? that game is old news now. let's talk about NU losing to Winona. by the way, i heard the marshall coach wanted to beat moorhead's 27 goals a few years back. his assistant coaches had to talk him out of it. are you still mad that you could never beat marshall h20?

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:40 pm
by h20
Author Message
stanryckman
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:27 pm Post subject:
are you still bitter h20? that game is old news now. let's talk about NU losing to Winona. by the way, i heard the marshall coach wanted to beat moorhead's 27 goals a few years back. his assistant coaches had to talk him out of it. are you still mad that you could never beat marshall h20?

point proven , like i said it all starts with the coach

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:58 pm
by HockeytownUSA
after reading all this junk i really think some of you are joking!!...because in my opinion if you werent at the game your a retard for even trying to pretend like you know what happened. Marshall had alot of class, they sat out there top players, they started run time early, they had their back up goalie in to give him some play time, what else are they suppose to do? do you want them to just stop skating? or maybe youd like the coach to tell the young kids who are trying to gain experience to waste the only experience time they get by not trying? They did everything in their power to get this game over with, and also to give other players more experience. props to marshall for that, and the W, its just a game, not saying they will win the section or anything.
Good coaching by marshall

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:19 pm
by newsguy35
HockeytownUSA wrote:after reading all this junk i really think some of you are joking!!...because in my opinion if you werent at the game your a retard for even trying to pretend like you know what happened. Marshall had alot of class, they sat out there top players, they started run time early, they had their back up goalie in to give him some play time, what else are they suppose to do? do you want them to just stop skating? or maybe youd like the coach to tell the young kids who are trying to gain experience to waste the only experience time they get by not trying? They did everything in their power to get this game over with, and also to give other players more experience. props to marshall for that, and the W, its just a game, not saying they will win the section or anything.
Good coaching by marshall
I know the head coach personally and he is a good guy. I am sure some are bitter over a defeat with that kind of seperation but I am sure he didnt want to make it as bad as it was. Marshall is not known for beating up on lesser opponents and so even if you do believe this was unfair, I think a second opinion has a need to be heard.

Congrats to Marshall and stay classy...

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:50 am
by hockup14
BSM 16 St. Francis 0
Shots: 66-0

anyone want to argue about this? 8)
im sure it was an issue with benilde's class

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:16 pm
by sregit34
0 shots, wow thats crazy. Would have thought Benik would have put up one shot.

3a

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:35 pm
by bombsquad06
Marshall 4 Windom 4
Is this true? Anyone know what the details of this game were?

Re: 3a

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:43 pm
by Edger
bombsquad06 wrote:Marshall 4 Windom 4
Is this true? Anyone know what the details of this game were?
MARSHALL — Rallying three times, Marshall settled for a 4-4 tie with Windom Area in Southwest Conference boys hockey Tuesday night.
The first-place Tigers (13-3-2, 8-0-1 SWC) twice trailed by two goals as the hard-working Eagles scored a pair of goals in the first two minutes.
Senior center Nick Jones tallied for the Eagles at 15:30 of the opening period, and sophomore center Hunter Johnson made it 2-0 with 15:05 left.
The Tigers countered on the power play with Aaron Ogdahl tipping in Ryne Hansen’s shot from the right point.
That goal came with 5:05 left in the first period, when Marshall was outshot 5-0 early on and was outshot 8-6 for the 17 minutes.
Windom tallied a power-play goal by sophomore defenseman Ryan Presthus at the 12:00 mark of the second period, staking the Eagles to a 3-1 lead.
Marshall’s John Doom went off the ice for interference, and the Tigers’ junior forward Danny Hansen came within a fraction of an inch of getting a short-handed goal moments into the Tigers’ penalty kill.
“I was trying to go top corner,” said Hansen, whose shot bounced off the crossbar. “I was ready to celebrate.”
Seven minutes later, Hansen’s bad luck continued.
Coming down the ice on a 2-on-1 break with Ryne Hanson, Hansen’s shot deflected off the left goal post.
“A defenseman was coming over, and I looked him off for a pass and shot,” Hansen said. “I was ready to celebrate on that one, too. I was getting very frustrated.”
“In the second period, we hit two crossbars,” Marshall coach Kori Pearson said. “We had chances to equalize things.”
In the closing two minutes of the second period, the Tigers’ Brian Byrnes got behind the defense for a breakaway. His shot went wide left.
The second line of Hansen centering Hanson and Byrnes played a solid game for the Tigers, who scored three third-period goals to get even at 4-4.
“That second line created a lot of chances,” Pearson said. “They did a nice job on forechecks. I thought it was one of Danny’s better games. He seemed confident. He was all over the ice.”
Windom (7-8-1, 4-3-1 SWC) was called for a penalty to end the second period, and Marshall capitalized with its second power-play goal. Two minutes into the third period, Andy Ogdahl scored after Hanson took the initial shot from the right point. That cut the deficit to 3-2.
“That penalty killed us,” Windom coach Steve Clark said. “If we would have killed if off, it might have been a different game. Marshall got one and crawled back into it. It was a matter of making them battle back.”
The Tigers did that. Hansen’s luck changed, as he scored to create a 3-3 tie with 12:13 remaining in the third period. However, the Eagles responded with sophomore Nick Eisenmenger tipping in a long pass from the left boards with 7:56 to play. Marshall’s Tony Krogen netted his 32nd goal of the season on a 1-on-1 rush after a Windom turnover with 3:09 remaining in regulation time.
“I went the five hole,” Krogen said of a 20-foot wrist shot. “I was lucky. I was ending a (line) shift, and I shot it. Fortunately, it went in.”
Marshall had a chance to win in the waning 1:44 of the third period, but Andy Ogdahl’s hard slap shot from the right point went off the pads of Eagles’ sophomore goaltender, Ethan Villenueve.
Tigers’ goalie, Paul Ivers, came up big on several occasions in the third period, when Marshall had a 12-5 edge in shots on goal. It was in overtime when Ivers saved the game, with an assist to his defense when Windom had a power play with 3:33 remaining.
Windom Area 2 1 1 0 — 4
Marshall 1 0 3 0 — 4
First period: 1.-W Nick Johns (Jesse Kerkaert) 15:50. 2.-W Hunter Johnson (Jimmy Amundson) 14:55. 3.-M Aaron Ogdahl (Ryne Hanson, Andy Ogdahl) 5:05.
Penalties: Tony Krogen, high sticking, 13:06; Kerkaert, tripping, 11:38; Aaron Ogdahl, tripping, 11:14; Ryan Presthus, slashing, 5:16.
Second period: 4.-W Presthus (Trevor Hage, Johnson) 12:00.
Penalties: John Doom, interference, 13:50; Matt Janssen, elbowing, 17:00.
Third period: 5.-M Andy Ogdahl (Hanson) 15:04. 6.-M Danny Hansen (Grant Sattler, Dereck Deutz) 12:13. 7.-W Nick Eisenmenger (Jason Cook, Jace Harwood) 7:56. 8.-M Krogen (unassisted) 3:09.
Penalties: None
Overtime: No scoring.
Penalties: Sean Marron, boarding, 3:33.
Shots on goal: WA 8-8-5-2 — 23; Marshall 6-8-12-6 — 32
Goaltenders: Ethan Villenueve (WA), 28 saves; Paul Ivers (M), 19 saves.

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:26 am
by minnhockey33
New Ulm 6
Austin 4

That's about the only thing that happened tonight, Litch, Hutch and i think Willmar play Friday, and Marshall plays Wadena on Saturday.