Page 18 of 20
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:22 pm
by packerboy
Interesting.
I still feelthe pain of all of those losses.
I sat in front of the TV in total disbelief in 1970.
The Steeler game was awful.
The Miami game was bad.
The Raiders game was embarrasing.
Id like to see 1 time the Vikes win that game.
I dont care who the QB is.
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:37 pm
by Can't Never Tried
It was hard to get the treat at school to watch NFL films each year after the game, just to re-live those losses, but the 1st three we only managed a total of 20 pts, while giving up 63, and then the Raiders game well........nevermind!
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:22 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
I'd love to see #4 in a Vikes jersey. He would shore up the only ? mark have. Yes those Packers fans could say it is all because of him, but who would have the ring? He spent how many years with them and only got 1 and comes here and is 1-1. Maybe we'd even bring Randy back
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:35 pm
by Can't Never Tried
Argggggh! Noooooo!
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:17 pm
by tomASS
What is Bobby Lee doing now days
and I don't mean our own bored's boblee
Gary Quazzo ?
I just can't see #4 in purple
And I'm with packerboy....just once! Please ! Just so I can give my father-in-law from Buffalo a ton of crap.
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:56 am
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
If Favre did sign with the Vikes it would put a damper on the jersey retiring day they have planned.
September 8 Minnesota @ Green Bay
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:59 am
by State Champ 97
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:If Favre did sign with the Vikes it would put a damper on the jersey retiring day they have planned.
September 8 Minnesota @ Green Bay
That would make things interesting.
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:13 am
by Can't Never Tried
More like sickening..... the whole thought just makes me want to>>>
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:26 am
by packerboy
Get over it CNT.
We have been OK with ex cheeseheads before.
Should we dump Sharper too?
Skol Brett Farve, Skol!
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:33 am
by Can't Never Tried
packerboy wrote:Get over it CNT.
We have been OK with ex cheeseheads before.
Should we dump Sharper too?
Skol Brett Farve, Skol!
I don't think he'd come here anyway...PB
This fish is spittin the hook on this deal...nice cast though!
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:44 am
by packerboy
I dont think the Vikes would want him.
One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.
I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.
And Brett, make up your boofin mind.
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:56 am
by Can't Never Tried
packerboy wrote:I dont think the Vikes would want him.
One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.
I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.
And Brett, make up your boofin mind.
That I completely agree on!
On Tjack he has the tools, he just needs to be cool under pressure, and that comes with experience.
I think we'll see marked improvement in him this year, and just in time... this is the year for us to be a contender..oh that's right we still got Chilly
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:15 am
by Neutron 14
Can't Never Tried wrote:On Tjack he has the tools...
Since your the expert on tools, I'll agree...
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:48 am
by Can't Never Tried
Neutron 14 wrote:Can't Never Tried wrote:On Tjack he has the tools...
Since your the expert on tools, I'll agree...
Ever wish you would have phrased something differently?
And with you lurking here I should have been more careful.
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:56 pm
by Govs93
Here is more fuel for the fire.
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:20 am
by UpNorthStars
packerboy wrote:I dont think the Vikes would want him.
One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.
I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.
And Brett, make up your boofin mind.
You're kidding right? It's all about a one year run in the NFL...he'd give the Vikes a legit chance at a ring this year. Plus no one could argue it'd hurt tjack to watch favre for a year.
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:01 pm
by Govs93
Whilst suffering through another agonizing Monday at work, I was looking through the Vikes schedule again. Did anybody else pick up on the fact that they have
ZERO cold weather games this season? Me likes...
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:47 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
NIce find Sherlock. Usually on Mondays I play Sudoka.
Favre would not like to be a Viking. He's a cold weather QB
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:28 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
Nice find Govs! Very interesting!
And Favre would work no matter the weather.
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:53 pm
by sinbin006
Good decision on not re-signing
him.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:13 am
by Neutron 14
packerboy wrote:Skol Brett Farve, Skol!
Looks fine to me...
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:15 am
by Can't Never Tried
Neutron 14 wrote:packerboy wrote:Skol Brett Farve, Skol!
Looks fine to me...
How do you do that?
Actually it's not funny
no! nat at all!
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:01 am
by packerboy
UpNorthStars wrote:packerboy wrote:I dont think the Vikes would want him.
One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.
I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.
And Brett, make up your boofin mind.
You're kidding right? It's all about a one year run in the NFL...he'd give the Vikes a legit chance at a ring this year. Plus no one could argue it'd hurt tjack to watch favre for a year.
CNT's Farve phobia notwithstanding, I am not kidding. GB and MN seem to want to move to a new player at the position. One that they drafted and have been grooming for it ,long term.
I dont necessarily agree with it , but it looks a lot like thats what both teams want to do and Farve doesnt fit in with their plans.
Farve bugs me but whats with the Packers.
Let Farve go to another team and go with Rogers. Thats what Montana and the 49ers did and it wasnt a big deal.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:22 am
by Can't Never Tried
packerboy wrote:UpNorthStars wrote:packerboy wrote:I dont think the Vikes would want him.
One player doesnt guarantee a Championship,even a HOF QB.
I think they want to develop TJack and see where that takes them. Having him take the year off would make no sense,long term, if they really think he is the QB of the future.
And Brett, make up your boofin mind.
You're kidding right? It's all about a one year run in the NFL...he'd give the Vikes a legit chance at a ring this year. Plus no one could argue it'd hurt tjack to watch favre for a year.
CNT's Farve phobia notwithstanding, I am not kidding. GB and MN seem to want to move to a new player at the position. One that they drafted and have been grooming for it ,long term.
I dont necessarily agree with it , but it looks a lot like thats what both teams want to do and Farve doesnt fit in with their plans.
Farve bugs me but whats with the Packers.
Let Farve go to another team and go with
Rogers. Thats what Montana and the 49ers did and it wasnt a big deal.
My favorite subject
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:46 pm
by Can't Never Tried
