Page 3 of 4

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:52 pm
by Bash Brother
Ankles Pierre, Jr. wrote:
dherman8 wrote:What was that?
...what m00rhead and Richfield will say after Hill rolls over them.
What will AP say if Hill loses both contests?

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:58 pm
by Ankles Pierre, Jr.
Bash Brother wrote:What will AP say if Hill loses both contests?
Won't even have time for a brief prayer as the Earth spins off its axis and hurtles into the Sun.

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:59 pm
by Bash Brother
Ankles Pierre, Jr. wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:What will AP say if Hill loses both contests?
Won't even have time for a brief prayer as the Earth spins off its axis and hurtles into the Sun.
Do you honestly have it embedded in you're deranged delusional head that Hill can beat. . .. DA SPUDS

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:03 pm
by dherman8
Ankles Pierre, Jr. wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:What will AP say if Hill loses both contests?
Won't even have time for a brief prayer as the Earth spins off its axis and hurtles into the Sun.
May God help us. Lets start praying AP.

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:04 pm
by dherman8
Bash Brother wrote:
Ankles Pierre, Jr. wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:What will AP say if Hill loses both contests?
Won't even have time for a brief prayer as the Earth spins off its axis and hurtles into the Sun.
Do you honestlyhave it embedded in youe deranged delusional head that Hill can beat. . .. DA SPUDS
Yes I think he does. Have you not realized how nuts he is? I think he was dropped on his head just as many times as I was when I was young. ](*,)

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:24 pm
by sachishi4
any updates on this game?

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:38 pm
by HShockeywatcher
Hopefully:
Richfield - more
Hill Murray - less

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:56 pm
by Slapshot*67
all even after 1 st period 1 to 1

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:06 pm
by HShockeywatcher
Nice.

Just curious if the game is behind or something; it was scheduled to start at 2:30 and you posted the 1st period score at about 4?

Re: richfield vs hill murray

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:08 pm
by Fargo
eagle10 wrote:richfield-3
hill murray-0
Thgis prediction looks about right where it should be, but

I will go with Richfield more and the flattened hill less.

If Richfield can't pull it off, There is no doubt that the Spuds will flatten da hill and anklets. By the way how did anklets get his name.

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:08 pm
by hunter
[size=18][/size]HM 3 Rich 2 in OT

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:09 pm
by Zamman
Final from the Palace:
HM 3 Richfield 2 in OT. Great game....

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:18 pm
by PuckNasty07
Shots and Time of Goals?

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:22 pm
by stars612
Told ya...

HM @ Richfield

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:36 pm
by stpaul
Wow - the Pioneers dodged a bullet. Shots 51-14 & Richfield forced them into OT.

from hmpioneers.net :

February 3, 2007 @ Richfield
Hill-Murray 1-1-0-1=3
Richfield 1-1-0-0=2

First period
Richfield, Hill (Olson, Gunner), 9:38 (pp).
HM, Furne 14, 14:10.

Second period
Richfield, Hill (Seaman), 10:17.
HM, Larson 23, 13:21.

Third period
No Scoring.

Overtime
HM, Sova 5 (Zepeda, Larson), 2:54.

Shots by period & Goalies
Hill-Murray 20-15-14-2=51 Phillippi (W, 12/14)
Richfield 6-5-2-1=14 Guggenberger (L, 48/51)

Power Plays
Hill-Murray 0-2 2:35
Richfield 1-4 3:40

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:43 pm
by Zamman
One problem with the previous post... Guggenberger played for Richfield, not Ballard.

Guggenberger

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:48 pm
by stpaul
Fixed it. HM Pioneers briefly had it wrong. Max Preps has it right.

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:51 pm
by mulletman22
Guggenberger played out of his mine. He kept Richfield in it the whole game. By the way Hill Murray never had the lead until the overtime victiory. But theres nothing more important then the final score at the end.

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:06 pm
by leftWinger15
it was a great game but agreed with mulletman....all that matters was the final....but boy did they give hill a run for their money today

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:11 pm
by Hillfan
I'll mention it again, Guggenberger played on top of his head in this one. 51 shots and just a few goals is more than impressive. It's amazing.

It seems as though Richfield has new life with their goalie in the nets now. Although they only had 14 shots, they showed pride and worked their tail ends off the whole game. I wish them the best of luck the rest of the way, both in the conference and sections!

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:12 pm
by Hilltopper99
Lots of credit to the Richfield goalie and the whole team for scrapping, but let's not get too crazy. Were you at the game? I was, and Hill absolutely dominated play.

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:16 pm
by leftWinger15
with a 3-2 overtime victory i wouldnt totally agree with you

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:20 pm
by gophsdynasty
I just want to say that shots and scoring chances are two different things and as for me id say they both had a pretty equal amount of scoring chances.

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:22 pm
by hightower
Richfield is going to be a real dark horse come sections.

Guggs is good enough to carry any team to state!

Zamman has got himself a backup team if Holy Angels lays an egg again this year in sections! :lol:

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:35 pm
by hightower
If you've watched any other Richfield games this year they do tend to get outshot most games 2 to 1!
South St. Paul, Tartan or Hill you name it!
Good scoring chances is a different story. Its just the style they play with Guggg's. Clear traffic for Gugg's so he can get a good look. Can't save what he can't see!
This game could have went either way today, Hill shoud be happy to sneak out with a win. :cry: