Page 3 of 5

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:35 pm
by schwang17
Bash Brother wrote:
schwang17 wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:The spuds continue to run up the score
3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?
Awfully defensive of your loser jags.
The Jags have a state title. Get back to me when you win 1.

6,547th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:37 pm
by slapshooter
'TImageNKS' again!

19-1-1

SImage S

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:38 pm
by Bash Brother
schwang17 wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:
schwang17 wrote: 3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?
Awfully defensive of your loser jags.
The Jags have a state title. Get back to me when you win 1.
O yeah, i forgot past state titles matter this year.

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:38 pm
by Potatohead9
schwang17 wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:
schwang17 wrote: 3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?
Awfully defensive of your loser jags.
The Jags have a state title. Get back to me when you win 1.
YEAH and MINE is BIGGER than YOURS.......

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:42 pm
by SPUDNUT
3-1 final
Shots 28-25 Spuds

Sounds like it got kinda chippy in 3rd - lotsa penalties.

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:45 pm
by SPUDNUT
Hey Potatohead -

Thought you were goin' down to the game.

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:47 pm
by Potatohead9
It appears that Moorheads second line was too much for Jefferson.......
Both teams first lines were shut out of the scoring tonight!
Moorhead must be resting up for the the Barnyard Worriers!

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:50 pm
by schwang17
Bash Brother wrote:Awfully defensive of your loser jags.

Bash Brother wrote:O yeah, i forgot past state titles matter this year.
They matter when you call them losers when everybody on this site knows who has lost the most when it counts! :D

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:52 pm
by Bash Brother
schwang17 wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:Awfully defensive of your loser jags.
The Jags have a state title. Get back to me when you win 1.
O yeah, i forgot past state titles matter this year.[/quote]

They matter when you call them losers when everybody on this site knows who has lost the most when it counts! :D[/quote]

Sleepy Eye :?:

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:54 pm
by schwang17
SPUDNUT wrote:3-1 final
Shots 28-25 Spuds

Sounds like it got kinda chippy in 3rd - lotsa penalties.

What a blowout! :shock:

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:54 pm
by Potatohead9
SPUDNUT wrote:Hey Potatohead -

Thought you were goin' down to the game.
I really wanted to but work seems to always get in the way........I have to make sacrifices now so I can make it to the State Tournament!
CitySpudsGuy was at the game and reports questionable reffing.....
I will wait for his post game comments....

Re: jags

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:03 pm
by schwang17
Potatohead9 wrote: Interesting how Cuda and Schwang attack those of us who actually predict a score to the game. [-X
Perhaps they will inform the rest of the posters of how the HOMER REFs played a roll at the BIG tonight..... :roll:
If it hasn't been reported yet Shots were 28 Moorhead to 25 Jefferson
Game Moorhead 3-1
I didn't attack those who predicted a score. I was attacking Baby Brother for saying someone is delusional for predicting Moorhead would lose.

Also, I wouldn't go off saying that homer refs had much to do with the score if you weren't there in attendance to actually see it for yourself.

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:04 pm
by SPUDNUT
schwang17 wrote:
SPUDNUT wrote:3-1 final
Shots 28-25 Spuds

Sounds like it got kinda chippy in 3rd - lotsa penalties.

What a blowout! :shock:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:07 pm
by Potatohead9
SPUDNUT wrote:
schwang17 wrote:
SPUDNUT wrote:3-1 final
Shots 28-25 Spuds

Sounds like it got kinda chippy in 3rd - lotsa penalties.

What a blowout! :shock:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
yeah like the Shots in that game SPUDNUT......Mhd 38.....Jags 10

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:08 pm
by Fargo
SPUDNUT wrote:
schwang17 wrote:
SPUDNUT wrote:3-1 final
Shots 28-25 Spuds

Sounds like it got kinda chippy in 3rd - lotsa penalties.

What a blowout! :shock:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
I call 9-1 very very angry Spuds :twisted: after Centenial 3-4.

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:11 pm
by schwang17
SPUDNUT wrote:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
That is definitely a blowout, Spud. I seem to remember a recent blowout you guys took at the hands of the Jags, too.

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:17 pm
by Potatohead9
schwang17 wrote:
SPUDNUT wrote:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
That is definitely a blowout, Spud. I seem to remember a recent blowout you guys took at the hands of the Jags, too.
I suppose its "Safer" to live in the past there schwang.....

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:20 pm
by Fargo
schwang17 wrote:
SPUDNUT wrote:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
That is definitely a blowout, Spud. I seem to remember a recent blowout you guys took at the hands of the Jags, too.
Let's stick to the season at hand oh bitter clang17! It is ok, we love you man. :-({|=
"can't we just all get along" (aka Rodney King, 1995)....

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:20 pm
by SPUDNUT
schwang17 wrote:
SPUDNUT wrote:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
That is definitely a blowout, Spud. I seem to remember a recent blowout you guys took at the hands of the Jags, too.
WOW - I wonder what is the bigger margin is: 6-1 or 9-1, somebody hand me a calculator ! Since these two started playing each other during regular season, Spuds lead 16-9. So your point is ?

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:20 pm
by schwang17
Potatohead9 wrote:I suppose its "Safer" to live in the past there schwang.....
9-1 is the past too isn't it?

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:26 pm
by Potatohead9
schwang17 wrote:
Potatohead9 wrote:I suppose its "Safer" to live in the past there schwang.....
9-1 is the past too isn't it?
[/b]8-12-3......Jeffersons 06-07 record....


But I suppose that this is in the "Past" lucky for you schwang

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:31 pm
by schwang17
Potatohead9 wrote:
[/b]8-12-3......Jeffersons 06-07 record....


But I suppose that this is in the "Past" lucky for you schwang
So is 0 State Titles...unluckily for you! :D

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:34 pm
by biscuitbasket
ANYWAYS........this was a fun game to watch tonight the Jags did about as good as i thought they would but moorhead is the 2nd ranked team in state and they won this game liked they should have. I liked watchin both the top lines of these two teams go at it but moorheads depth beat out jefferson's, Jefferson played a pretty good game and im guessing their gonna be one of those teams in sections that you really just dont wanna play but who knows it was fun to watch

Re: jags

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:43 pm
by cuda701
baldbobl wrote:Cuda, If you can't get the game right at least get the saying right. You seem to be fine with judging others on the board when they don't agree with your opinion. Maybe you're the one that's delusional?

Mostly you seem to be dodging the fact that is was the "Sophs" as you say that did such a fine job at the Schwans cup. Or, are you comparing Rosemount with Moorhead?
cuda701 wrote:It's easy to be a "sideline quarterback". Anyway, didn't the soph's score 4 out of 5 goals in the last game? The circumstances may vary on any given day and I myself will leave that decision to people that know better than I.

:)
My guess is that you're a wanna-be coach. :wink:

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:52 pm
by cuda701
Potatohead9 wrote:
schwang17 wrote:
SPUDNUT wrote:
Whatd'ya call 9-1 ? ? ?
Musta been one of those that were "closer than the score" things ! ! !
That is definitely a blowout, Spud. I seem to remember a recent blowout you guys took at the hands of the Jags, too.
I suppose its "Safer" to live in the past there schwang.....
Are you referring the the "past" as in the Schwan's Cup? :lol:

You used to make sense as I remember last year...A little frustrated by your blowout? Good Job, Jags!