Page 3 of 4
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:31 pm
by selloutcrowd99
missingteeth1 wrote:it wasnt highland who played rochester it was Eagan
really? on the website it said Highland beat Eagan 5-1, and that highland would be playing Rochester to go to state...
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:36 pm
by missingteeth1
no it was the other way around
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:48 pm
by Hockey22
Rochester 5
Eagan 3
WBL 4
Lakeville South 3
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:51 pm
by selloutcrowd99
missingteeth1 wrote:no it was the other way around
Ohh my bad...
Actually the websites bad, they typed it in wrong. Haha I was gonna say, jeez Eagan took a 5-1 beating to Highland/Central but nevermind.
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 5:53 pm
by hockeyforevr
so who is going to state?
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:02 pm
by hustla17
white bear and rochester going to state rochester deserves to go but white bear was handed the win by the refs, but i wish them luck
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:05 pm
by ovy14
white bear and rochester going to state rochester deserves to go but white bear was handed the win by the refs, but i wish them luck
how was white bear handed the win by the refs??
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:07 pm
by DAbears25
Yea hustla17...can you please explain??
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:08 pm
by dangla9
DAbears25 wrote:Yea hustla17...can you please explain??
dabears did you even play in reagions
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:18 pm
by shoot and score1
white bear lake 2 goal the net was off its moorings
white bear lakes 3 goal was kicked in
wbl got lucky the refs were blind
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:19 pm
by DAbears25
dangla9 wrote:DAbears25 wrote:Yea hustla17...can you please explain??
dabears did you even play in reagions
Sure did....and advanced to the State tourney.
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:28 am
by snipe11
what # were u
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:10 am
by DAbears25
Doesn't matter. Arent you the kid from Faribault? If you were on that team then sorry for saying any crap about them earlier, they have gotten alot better since the time i saw them and really gave us a hard time. We were nervous thinkin it could be over. They also had some nice players on the team.
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:26 am
by DAbears25
shoot and score1 wrote:white bear lake 2 goal the net was off its moorings
white bear lakes 3 goal was kicked in
wbl got lucky the refs were blind
I really am not trying to brag here, but dude, cmon. I really hope your not from Lakeville and saying that because we outplayed LS most of the game and if anything the refs had more calls on us and LS had the PP more. I have plenty of respect for the Lakeville team and they fought hard and had us scared at times and have some very good players as well. But those things are part of the game and they always happen in almost every game whether its a missed call or goal that was lucky or the net was supposedly off. We have worked hard to get to where we are, with the exception of maybe the Como game, and I just think its annoying to hear those excuse-like comments on how we won. Also good game if you played for the Lakeville team.
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:29 pm
by keepyourheadup
Dabears your're right on, I watched the game and WBL clearly controlled play, while anyone can question the valildity of goals that are created by hard work and crashing the net, on this day the better team won. LS survived nearly all year by making teams pay for giving up odd man rushes. By my count South had six two on 1's and two 3 on 1's that resulted in just one goal. Lakeville just does not have the horsepower to grind people into submission, they have been excellent counter punchers all year but were unable to convert the opportunities they got. WBL deseved the W and I wish them success at state. P.S. Be careful crashing your d so much, a good team will make you pay dearly.
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:49 pm
by dpsaucer5
if u were at the fbo wbl game u would know it was horse PLEASE BAN ME.. one kid gets ejected for doing basically nothing.. wbl is one of the cheapest teams i played this year..now i know we (fbo) didnt have a very tough schedule but u were still PLEASE BAN ME cheap! the refs didnt call really anything on u during our game which really affected the outcome..
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:58 pm
by DAbears25
How were we cheap? What did we do that was cheap? Seriously...just tell me what it is i wanna know. Im not mad I am just wondering and that game was not horse ****..it was a good game and we battled back and just happen to win in OT but it could of gone either way. You guys played a good game and totally caught us off guard at first.
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:12 pm
by SotaH0ck14
shoot and score1 wrote:white bear lake 2 goal the net was off its moorings
white bear lakes 3 goal was kicked in
wbl got lucky the refs were blind
WBL controlled the game completely
shots were around 37-18? in favor of WBL
someone please correct me on the shot totals i know they were around those numbers
good fight by Lakeville South but the Cougs couldnt take down those Bears
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:14 pm
by DAbears25
I think our coach said 36 to 14 but i am not totally sure.
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:15 pm
by SotaH0ck14
oh ok i knew it was around there somewhere
congrats on a trip to the state tourney
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:16 pm
by DAbears25
thanks man
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:36 pm
by jitz17
#9 from wbl was a phenom yo...
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:38 pm
by dangla8
so
DAbears what ure sayin is that fbo was much better than u had thought but what # were u
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:40 pm
by DAbears25
Yes i am and sort of apologizing for the comments i made about them earlier on how they werent good at all because they are a good team.
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:45 pm
by jitz17
fbo wasnt that good in the third period against wbl lake they hardly got any shots