Page 3 of 3

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:28 pm
by H-M 4 Life
Hill-Murray will win this section and any hockey player from hill could beat a player from tartan one on one any day of the week. No Contest

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:36 pm
by Govs93
Sparlimb wrote:
Govs93 wrote:It seems abundantly clear to me that even if the Govs don't win Section 4AA, we've at least come out smelling like a rose on this thread. :wink:
Govs93's ability to stay classy has been noted. I will mention this to my son and make sure we cheer you on through sections (My allegiance only goes so far though).
Much appreciated. The Govs intend to turn Section 4AA into a travishamockery from the #8 position come February.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:00 pm
by wxbxl04
i know this is old, but its pretty funny that so many hill fans made fun of tartan.. :]

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:10 pm
by Govs93
Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:24 pm
by formerlybackofnet
Hill and WBL will dominate this section just like they did on old 3AA. But when they get to the big show, that's another question.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:40 pm
by sicknasty7722
Govs93 wrote:Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.
But you don't see a bunch of White Bear players/fans going on here and starting threads like "double didget (digit) wins" and posting things like how badly their going to cream the other team.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:47 pm
by Govs93
sicknasty7722 wrote:
Govs93 wrote:Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.
But you don't see a bunch of White Bear players/fans going on here and starting threads like "double didget (digit) wins" and posting things like how badly their going to cream the other team.
Like I say, I'm not backing HM here... I'm just saying that the timing from a WBL fan on this one isn't very smart. In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's "pioneerish". :wink:

If the Bears want to come in and snicker at a HM loss (or any other team for that matter - forget about HM) after they get dropped by an 0-5 team, more power to 'em. Makes you wonder what kind of a fan they are if you ask me. If they cared about their own club, they'd be a little more concerned about them and the turmoil they're wrapped up in at the moment, wouldn't you think?

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:48 pm
by Can't Never Tried
sicknasty7722 wrote:
Govs93 wrote:Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.
But you don't see a bunch of White Bear players/fans going on here and starting threads like "double didget (digit) wins" and posting things like how badly their going to cream the other team.
I believe they were busy out paint balling :P
:lol:

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:24 pm
by Sparlimb
Can't Never Tried wrote:I believe they were busy out paint balling :P
:lol:

Do you think that if they had gotten their skates before they went paintballing that they would have "skated away free"?

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:31 pm
by Can't Never Tried
Sparlimb wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:I believe they were busy out paint balling :P
:lol:

Do you think that if they had gotten their skates before they went paintballing that they would have "skated away free"?
Depends they don't appear to be that "sharp" :roll:

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:20 pm
by wxbxl04
Govs93 wrote:
sicknasty7722 wrote:
Govs93 wrote:Didn't WBL lose to a 1-5 (who were 0-5 at the time) Park team on the very same night?

I'm not one to back the Pioneers at any point, but you might want to clean up your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbor's door.
But you don't see a bunch of White Bear players/fans going on here and starting threads like "double didget (digit) wins" and posting things like how badly their going to cream the other team.
Like I say, I'm not backing HM here... I'm just saying that the timing from a WBL fan on this one isn't very smart. In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's "pioneerish". :wink:

If the Bears want to come in and snicker at a HM loss (or any other team for that matter - forget about HM) after they get dropped by an 0-5 team, more power to 'em. Makes you wonder what kind of a fan they are if you ask me. If they cared about their own club, they'd be a little more concerned about them and the turmoil they're wrapped up in at the moment, wouldn't you think?
what i said wasnt meant to be another hill vs. white bear fight, so i'll rephrase..

congratulations to tartan for proving the hill fans on this topic wrong.

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:38 am
by thorhockey
Rankings: December 19, 2007
1 Minnetonka (6-0-0) 50.2
2 Edina (5-0-0) 46.7
3 Centennial (5-1-0) 37.7
4 Owatonna (5-1-0) 36.3
5 Eastview (4-3-1) 35.4
6 Hill-Murray (5-1-0) 34.5
7 Woodbury (6-1-0) 34.4
8 Bloomington Jefferson (6-1-1) 33.7
9 Burnsville (5-3-0) 33.4
10 Rosemount (8-2-0) 33.0
11 Tartan (6-2-0) 32.0

Only 2 Hill campus' in top ten with Central comin' on strong The gappeth closeth

Hill fans (and wanna be's) responses

Tartan is horrible. Razz
6. Tartan: Average team last year that may be worse.
Tartan has emerged as one of the states hockey powerhouses.
This is definately Tartan's section to lose.
7 and 8- The two St. Paul teams and Tartan can battle it out for last place
If you do the math, that means that their team is likely to be worse or at best, the same
"Tartan is horrible at hockey.
We look at the games with Tartan as a measuring stick of our program. We go into that game knowing a win is highly unlikely (but we do watch the movie Miracle before for inspiration) but we just hope by playing the best we can see how the game should be played
Hill-Murray will win this section and any hockey player from hill could beat a player from tartan one on one any day of the week. No Contest
the lonely prediction (mine)
So when you lost to Tartan in the past and when you lose to Tartan in the future do you always use the excuse that you are rebuilding and reloading? I expect Hill to give Tartan a good game.
Take an extra slug of "whine" next time communion comes up
If God can forgive you then i guess I can too. No apologies required.
My gloating soon coming to an end.

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:13 pm
by Sparlimb
thorhockey wrote:My gloating soon coming to an end.

I see no reason to quit gloating. No matter what happens in game 2, Tartan will go into sections knowing they have beaten Hill this year. And if WBL continues to fall as it looks like they might, Tartan very well may be the second seed in sections...

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:31 pm
by Govs93
Sparlimb wrote: Tartan very well may be the second seed in sections...
3rd.

Image

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:22 pm
by Sparlimb
Govs93 wrote:3rd.
Image

I meant 2nd after Johnson. Hill can fight Stillwater for #3...