The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
I don't understand how Roseau won last night. Moorhead's regular season schedule was much tougher.packerboy wrote:Its a bleeping fact. Its not subject to debate. They do not play a difficult schedule. End of discussion. I dont care why they dont play a tough schedule, they dont.
Now, what does that mean?
I dont think the Rams should necessarily be punished for it and not seeded, but they shpuldn't get a pass on it either.
So were the schedules of 4O other schools.WatchDog'sRight wrote:I don't understand how Roseau won last night. Moorhead's regular season schedule was much tougher.packerboy wrote:Its a bleeping fact. Its not subject to debate. They do not play a difficult schedule. End of discussion. I dont care why they dont play a tough schedule, they dont.
Now, what does that mean?
I dont think the Rams should necessarily be punished for it and not seeded, but they shpuldn't get a pass on it either.
As a "Citiot" and an Edina pimp, many of us have great respect for the north some may even call it envy.watchdog wrote:and give the north some respect.
Don't take the ribbing too hard.And you aren't part of it.packerboy wrote:Its a seeding discussion BIAFP. I have yet to hear about a seeding meeting where strength of schedule wasn't discussed.
B...........We've had this conversation before. The SOS trophies are in a dusty cloak room in Braemar's East Rink.BIAFP wrote:I have been watching the tourney for many years and I have yet to see a trophy or medals awarded for strength of schedule
Roseau played many teams that are weaker than SSP.watchdog wrote:the only way roseau schedule could have been any weaker is if we played ssp..
Well , actaully they are hidden by the 9 Championship trophies.The Huge Hook wrote:B...........We've had this conversation before. The SOS trophies are in a dusty cloak room in Braemar's East Rink.BIAFP wrote:I have been watching the tourney for many years and I have yet to see a trophy or medals awarded for strength of schedule
Hidden from normal view!
Three hundred sixty-four thousand, seven hundred and eleven if you include Girls Tennis.packerboy wrote:
Well , actaully they are hidden by the 9 Championship trophies.
It just so happens I agree with him.Neut:Neutron 14 wrote:I know O-Town is very aware of how good Roseau is. And he knows that I do also. They very well could be the best team in the state. But were talking about whats been proven here, and not because "watchdog or BIAFP says". To say Roseau is #1 is an opinion, and its arguable due to a less than stellar SOS. And one thing I know about packerboy is that if its arguable, he will argue it.
Cindy's no prize...O-townClown wrote:Three hundred sixty-four thousand, seven hundred and eleven if you include Girls Tennis.packerboy wrote:
Well , actaully they are hidden by the 9 Championship trophies.
Packerboy, Roseau didn't play the hardest schedule. Doesn't matter, they're obviously very good.
Maybe they will lose in St. Paul, but if "Cindy Crawford is beautiful" is a fact so is "Roseau has a great HS hockey team" this season.
Still planning on seeing an Edina-Roseau final. Enough wondering has been done on who would win a game between the two. Wouldn't it be nice to know?
When was this announced?O-townClown wrote:
Neut:
They are the #1 seed.
You are right Neut but all seriousness aside, I am not saying Roseau shouldnt be #1 just to be difficult or argue something. I really dont believe that they deserve it.Neutron 14 wrote:I know O-Town is very aware of how good Roseau is. And he knows that I do also. They very well could be the best team in the state. But were talking about whats been proven here, and not because "watchdog or BIAFP says". To say Roseau is #1 is an opinion, and its arguable due to a less than stellar SOS. And one thing I know about packerboy is that if its arguable, he will argue it.
In all honesty, they finished on top last season and haven't lost since - it's hard to argue against them being #1. They've earned it... Doesn't mean it's not fun just to get the Rams' faithful riled up though!packerboy wrote:You are right Neut but all seriousness aside, I am not saying Roseau shouldnt be #1 just to be difficult or argue something. I really dont believe that they deserve it.Neutron 14 wrote:I know O-Town is very aware of how good Roseau is. And he knows that I do also. They very well could be the best team in the state. But were talking about whats been proven here, and not because "watchdog or BIAFP says". To say Roseau is #1 is an opinion, and its arguable due to a less than stellar SOS. And one thing I know about packerboy is that if its arguable, he will argue it.
If Edinas was 19-6 or something, fine but they lose 2 games by one goal each to BSM and Tonka and so that puts them at #2 because Roseau is undefeated with that schedule. Bullship.
next weekNeutron 14 wrote:
When was this announced?
I've seen Roseau twice and found them to be very, very dangerous looking at it from an Edina point of view.AngusYoung wrote:Cindy's no prize...O-townClown wrote:Three hundred sixty-four thousand, seven hundred and eleven if you include Girls Tennis.packerboy wrote:
Well , actaully they are hidden by the 9 Championship trophies.
Packerboy, Roseau didn't play the hardest schedule. Doesn't matter, they're obviously very good.
Maybe they will lose in St. Paul, but if "Cindy Crawford is beautiful" is a fact so is "Roseau has a great HS hockey team" this season.
Still planning on seeing an Edina-Roseau final. Enough wondering has been done on who would win a game between the two. Wouldn't it be nice to know?
Just curious, from those involved in the discussion, how many have seen Roseau or any of the teams on Roseau's schedule play?
AY
Yes packerboy. I already said I agree with you.packerboy wrote:You are right Neut but all seriousness aside, I am not saying Roseau shouldnt be #1 just to be difficult or argue something. I really dont believe that they deserve it.Neutron 14 wrote:I know O-Town is very aware of how good Roseau is. And he knows that I do also. They very well could be the best team in the state. But were talking about whats been proven here, and not because "watchdog or BIAFP says". To say Roseau is #1 is an opinion, and its arguable due to a less than stellar SOS. And one thing I know about packerboy is that if its arguable, he will argue it.
Name ONE??packerboy wrote:Roseau played many teams that are weaker than SSP.watchdog wrote:the only way roseau schedule could have been any weaker is if we played ssp..
Kinda shot yourself in the foot on that one, eh?
Govs93 wrote:In all honesty, they finished on top last season and haven't lost since - it's hard to argue against them being #1. They've earned it... Doesn't mean it's not fun just to get the Rams' faithful riled up though!packerboy wrote:You are right Neut but all seriousness aside, I am not saying Roseau shouldnt be #1 just to be difficult or argue something. I really dont believe that they deserve it.Neutron 14 wrote:I know O-Town is very aware of how good Roseau is. And he knows that I do also. They very well could be the best team in the state. But were talking about whats been proven here, and not because "watchdog or BIAFP says". To say Roseau is #1 is an opinion, and its arguable due to a less than stellar SOS. And one thing I know about packerboy is that if its arguable, he will argue it.
If Edinas was 19-6 or something, fine but they lose 2 games by one goal each to BSM and Tonka and so that puts them at #2 because Roseau is undefeated with that schedule. Bullship.