Page 3 of 4

Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:25 pm
by new2hockey
Sorry, kid, if you're reading this, which I hope you're not. All I did was tell people you weren't from St. Peter, and look what it's become.

Anyway, I think the question was about who the best 95's are at the present time. So, forget the past. And, if you still have to talk about these kids, how about you tell us what makes them good hockey players. I'm sure they get enough criticism from their coaches and parents and other people that actually know them well.

Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:32 pm
by hockeyman95
hkymomx5 wrote:All i hear about are all these great players from grand rapids throughout most of the threads on this board. Yet when i goto tournaments like superseries this weekend or other top AAA tournaments i dont see any of those kids. My point is this if you cant show up with some of the best players in the state and prove your the best put a sock in it. My son played on the minor peewee east team this weekend i noticed two very talented players at that level. (most would be 95's) They would be #4 from the west team Andrew Zerban wisconsin fire and # 5 from the north Keaton Thompson from Devils lake.
Those rosters were abunch of crap there were many many very talented and smart hockey players that weren't in that tournement it's all politics and who ever picked those teams don't know hockey.

Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:33 pm
by hockeyman95
hkymomx5 wrote:All i hear about are all these great players from grand rapids throughout most of the threads on this board. Yet when i goto tournaments like superseries this weekend or other top AAA tournaments i dont see any of those kids. My point is this if you cant show up with some of the best players in the state and prove your the best put a sock in it. My son played on the minor peewee east team this weekend i noticed two very talented players at that level. (most would be 95's) They would be #4 from the west team Andrew Zerban wisconsin fire and # 5 from the north Keaton Thompson from Devils lake.
Those rosters were abunch of crap there were many many very talented and smart hockey players that weren't in that tournement it's all politics and who ever picked those teams don't know hockey.

Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:25 pm
by buzzard
WOW ..... now I'm the one to laugh because greztky 9 I've got your # no pun intended!!!!!!!

st peter

Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:04 pm
by council member retired
What does St Peter do to keep some of their top players?
I had a cousin whom was a ref in a summer trny.. A kid from St Peter was playing as a fraudelent 95' in a AAA trny. He was a older 94', he had the team he was on fooled, everyone fooled. Except a parent from St Peter whom was on another of the AAA teams and pointed it out.
That St Peter parent and the current team this player were on, worked together and had the kid removed from their roster. Is this accepted in St Peter?

Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 10:08 am
by watchdog
hockeyman95 i agree with you not all the top players are in those tourneys. some by choice others that just arent asked to play for one reason or another. however as a person that was at both tourneys this past weekend it does shine a light on certain kids mentioned on this board all the time and thats what i get out of hkymoms post. for example 94's who played peewees all season and went to selects and were mixed in with the 94's that played bantams didnt look so good anymore. when people make these threads about top 95 or 94s ect... cant really make that claim until most of the chips are on the table. these types of tourneys do tell a tail. you can also see alot in the bigger AAA tourneys like the meltdown invite when the whos who show up to play. i seen players mentioned on this board as top players this weekend that didnt even belong on the ice with their perspective teams just not good enough.

Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 4:44 pm
by mrhockey2110
They are all great!

Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 10:24 am
by SuperStar
I was being fascious, Junior.

Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 2:58 pm
by mghockey18
Cody's sister is pretty good lookin, so i have nothin wrong with em..even though he just left for the blades

Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 1:04 am
by Reggie
AP from GR!

Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 12:13 pm
by watchdog
ok peterson stay calm and try showing it on the ice instead of bragging about yourself on the board.

Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 8:46 pm
by GROCK878
Duluth 4 wrote:
wild_hockey_08 wrote:If #8 from GR is a 95 than yes he is the best. He looks like an average 93
I am #8 and i am a 95
no your actually not avery peterson cuz he hates duluth and i play hockey with him
and ya he is a very dominant hockey player i think he is our next pat white. and for the guy that said he was a 94 doesnt know what hes talking about peterson is in sixth grade

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:51 pm
by Reggie
watchdog wrote:ok peterson stay calm and try showing it on the ice instead of bragging about yourself on the board.
It's ok, maby one day someone will talk about you on here and it will be all better.

Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 8:58 am
by watchdog
you have been blowing the same horn all year its starting to sound baaaaaaad.

Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 8:38 pm
by Reggie
watchdog wrote:you have been blowing the same horn all year its starting to sound baaaaaaad.
Thats right for good reason, someone asked the question and #8 is the answer, you're the only one whom has anything bad to say about #8, but I would to if he stomped you out all year!

Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:06 am
by watchdog
i havent said anything bad. i said you should stop bragging yourself up on the board. Also my son played on the roseau peewee team and we split with grand rapids on the season. i have nothing against gr i like their hockey program and the people from their. the question your talking about has been on the board pretty much all year how MANY times do you need to answer it? i gave you some friendly advice how you take it is up to you i personaly could care less.

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:55 am
by GROCK878
watchdog wrote:i havent said anything bad. i said you should stop bragging yourself up on the board. Also my son played on the roseau peewee team and we split with grand rapids on the season. i have nothing against gr i like their hockey program and the people from their. the question your talking about has been on the board pretty much all year how MANY times do you need to answer it? i gave you some friendly advice how you take it is up to you i personaly could care less.
Umm that isnt him just because someone says that someones good doesn't mean its the person bragging about themselves. a northern boy is owning everyone...funny

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:34 am
by C-dad
GROCK878 wrote:
Duluth 4 wrote:
wild_hockey_08 wrote:If #8 from GR is a 95 than yes he is the best. He looks like an average 93
I am #8 and i am a 95
no your actually not avery peterson cuz he hates duluth and i play hockey with him
and ya he is a very dominant hockey player i think he is our next pat white. and for the guy that said he was a 94 doesnt know what hes talking about peterson is in sixth grade
He was held back two years in school?

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:22 pm
by Nobodyonya
C-dad wrote:
GROCK878 wrote:
Duluth 4 wrote: I am #8 and i am a 95
no your actually not avery peterson cuz he hates duluth and i play hockey with him
and ya he is a very dominant hockey player i think he is our next pat white. and for the guy that said he was a 94 doesnt know what hes talking about peterson is in sixth grade
He was held back two years in school?
Hmmmmm...A 95 player in sixth grade? Do the math! Anyways, from all the years we have played Grand Rapids there is no 95 player that even comes close to an average 93 player. This topic on the best 95 player thread needs to go away

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:39 pm
by observer
Hudson Fasching is one of the best 95 players in the state and is better than most of the average 93s. Big too.

Agree

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:25 pm
by northwoods oldtimer
Hmmmmm...A 95 player in sixth grade? Do the math! Anyways, from all the years we have played Grand Rapids there is no 95 player that even comes close to an average 93 player. This topic on the best 95 player thread needs to go away
Absolutely correct this talk is a bunch of bull. I hope your coaches know you like to come on hear and talk yourself up, you will never do it again. :x

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:53 am
by mngopherfan
observer wrote:Hudson Fasching is one of the best 95 players in the state and is better than most of the average 93s. Big too.
he's a man...is he going to play HS somewhere this season??

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:13 am
by muckandgrind
mngopherfan wrote:
observer wrote:Hudson Fasching is one of the best 95 players in the state and is better than most of the average 93s. Big too.
he's a man...is he going to play HS somewhere this season??
Apple Valley.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:32 pm
by hockeystud9
hkymomx5 wrote:number 8 from rapids is a 94 also.. the 95 level in minnesota is one of the deepest for talent in the state. something was in the water that year.
number 8 from rapids is a 95 avery peterson he is one of the best that i have seen

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:37 pm
by hockeystud9
Hockeyguy_27 wrote:
hockeyman95 wrote:
rbkhockey4life wrote: yeah and he will be on the bantam A team next year i bet and will probablly be one of the top five scores this kid will dominate his senior year
I watched a game that grand rapids played and I didn't think he stood out at
ALLLLLLLLLLLL I wasn't very impressed at all.
8 was a nice player but he wasn't close to as good as #87, #22 and #44 on the rapids team.
#8 from rapids is a 95 he was playing first line on a team that was filled with 93s and 94s he is by far one of the best in the state 87 22 and 44 are all 94s the only one of those who can compare to #22 who is jake bischoff the son of grant