Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:11 pm
by CLDafencemen17
MrBoDangles wrote:CLDafencemen17 wrote:this is the stupidest idea ever! CI has enough players as it is.. plus most if not all of the NB players are garbage. we just scrimmaged them and tossed their salad.. only a few nb players would makke the team anyhow... And North branch just got a great new head coach Randy Gendreau.. he is a great coach but he also does not like the CI coach that much
I was able to watch the scrimmage tonight, "GARBAGE" they are not! NB tied a very good (I will admit) CL team 7-7. After being up 5-0 NB lost their intensity and let the lead slip away. NB will have a couple very dominant lines next season and Jarret Sachs and Lane Noyes (played tonight at about 50%) will be among the best players in class A (not that class matters).
Watch what you say about other teams, you're only making your own look less credible.....
NB did not lose their intensity they were getting outplayed ALL night they could barely break the puck out cause CL had them bottled up nearly the whole game. CL did not put many quality shots on net in the first half and the NB goaltender played really well in the first half. In the second have CL pulled their heads out and outscored NB 7-2. And then beat them in the shootout 8-2. In addition CL was missing their top goaltender top two forwards and two of their top defensemen for this game
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:26 pm
by MrBoDangles
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:44 pm
by MrBoDangles
MrBoDangles wrote:CLDafencemen17 wrote:MrBoDangles wrote: I was able to watch the scrimmage tonight, "GARBAGE" they are not! NB tied a very good (I will admit) CL team 7-7. After being up 5-0 NB lost their intensity and let the lead slip away. NB will have a couple very dominant lines next season and Jarret Sachs and Lane Noyes (played tonight at about 50%) will be among the best players in class A (not that class matters).
Watch what you say about other teams, you're only making your own look less credible.....
NB did not lose their intensity they were getting outplayed ALL night they could barely break the puck out cause CL had them bottled up nearly the whole game. CL did not put many quality shots on net in the first half and the NB goaltender played really well in the first half. In the second have CL pulled their heads out and outscored NB 7-2. And then beat them in the shootout 8-2. In addition CL was missing their top goaltender top two forwards and two of their top defensemen for this game
NB was missing top players also........YOUR TEAM WOULD NEVER MATCH NB'S TOP LINE! NB was up 5-0 after the first session (dominated the first 50 minute session) and former CL coach Randy G DIDN'T want to make it ugly so he changed up the lineups. MAYBE NB WILL BE IN THE STATE TOURNAMENT INSTEAD OF CL!!??
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:02 pm
by TellItHowItIs
Am I really reading all of this correctly
NB or CL at State. ??? Really??
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:08 pm
by MrBoDangles
TellItHowItIs wrote:Am I really reading all of this correctly
NB or CL at State. ??? Really??
I was trying to awaken the kid to CL's chances....... I don't believe I'm getting through to him
. They will have a chance to make some noise in the North Suburban conference in the next couple years...... 2nd or 3rd possibly.
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:35 pm
by nhockey33
MrBoDangles wrote:MrBoDangles wrote:CLDafencemen17 wrote:
NB did not lose their intensity they were getting outplayed ALL night they could barely break the puck out cause CL had them bottled up nearly the whole game. CL did not put many quality shots on net in the first half and the NB goaltender played really well in the first half. In the second have CL pulled their heads out and outscored NB 7-2. And then beat them in the shootout 8-2. In addition CL was missing their top goaltender top two forwards and two of their top defensemen for this game
NB was missing top players also........YOUR TEAM WOULD NEVER MATCH NB'S TOP LINE! NB was up 5-0 after the first session (dominated the first 50 minute session) and former CL coach Randy G DIDN'T want to make it ugly so he changed up the lineups. MAYBE NB WILL BE IN THE STATE TOURNAMENT INSTEAD OF CL!!??
how is jarrett at50% i know lane is but how is jarrett
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:26 am
by MrBoDangles
nhockey33 wrote:MrBoDangles wrote:MrBoDangles wrote: NB was missing top players also........YOUR TEAM WOULD NEVER MATCH NB'S TOP LINE! NB was up 5-0 after the first session (dominated the first 50 minute session) and former CL coach Randy G DIDN'T want to make it ugly so he changed up the lineups. MAYBE NB WILL BE IN THE STATE TOURNAMENT INSTEAD OF CL!!??
how is jarrett at50% i know lane is but how is jarrett
Ment to be just Lane....
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:56 am
by nhockey33
MrBoDangles wrote:nhockey33 wrote:MrBoDangles wrote:
how is jarrett at50% i know lane is but how is jarrett
Ment to be just Lane....
he might be having surgery i guess
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:30 pm
by MrBoDangles
CLDafencemen17 wrote:this is the stupidest idea ever! CI has enough players as it is.. plus most if not all of the NB players are garbage. we just scrimmaged them and tossed their salad.. only a few nb players would makke the team anyhow... And North branch just got a great new head coach Randy Gendreau.. he is a great coach but he also does not like the CI coach that much
"Garbage"- (NB) Beat CL 12-7 Tonight!.......... CL lost to Cambridge last week by 1
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:12 am
by steelheader
This thread needs to be put to bed.
These are jv and bantam players and maybe 3 returning varsity players (for Cambridge anyway and I really hope NB and CL).
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:16 pm
by MrBoDangles
steelheader wrote:This thread needs to be put to bed.
These are jv and bantam players and maybe 3 returning varsity players (for Cambridge anyway and I really hope NB and CL).
Simmer down! Just showing the CL boy that NB can hang.......Not that NB can beat a Cambridge varsity team, if you would have read through you would have understood that........NB WOULD have a very good showing on a merged team though
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:16 pm
by BodyShots
MrBoDangles wrote:steelheader wrote:This thread needs to be put to bed.
These are jv and bantam players and maybe 3 returning varsity players (for Cambridge anyway and I really hope NB and CL).
Simmer down! Just showing the CL boy that NB can hang.......Not that NB can beat a Cambridge varsity team, if you would have read through you would have understood that........
NB WOULD have a very good showing on a merged team though
And so would every other team in the state!
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:50 pm
by MrBoDangles
CLDafencemen17 wrote:this is the stupidest idea ever! CI has enough players as it is.. plus most if not all of the NB players are garbage. we just scrimmaged them and tossed their salad.. only a few nb players would makke the team anyhow... And North branch just got a great new head coach Randy Gendreau.. he is a great coach but he also does not like the CI coach that much
BodyShots? Pffffff... More like taken a few headshots....
