Adv. 15

Discussion of Minnesota Girls High School Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

ron123
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:38 am

Post by ron123 »

mnhkylvr wrote:I didn't notice that until reading your post. But you are right. She is solid!!! We just played in a tourny with her (fortunately not against her) and she is a WALL!

Why are posts regarding Erika Allen being eliminated?
Hansonbrother
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:28 pm

Post by Hansonbrother »

ron123 wrote:
mnhkylvr wrote:I didn't notice that until reading your post. But you are right. She is solid!!! We just played in a tourny with her (fortunately not against her) and she is a WALL!

Why are posts regarding Erika Allen being eliminated?
perhaps someone on the selection committee must have overlooked her and maybe happens to run this forum???
Homer
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 3:45 pm

Post by Homer »

I have to agree, I think both of Roseville's goalies were u15s this year. (not positive about J. Boss) Lerol (the other D2 goalie)had some impressive stats but that was on WBL jv. They are usually a pretty solid team, don't think she saw much action. I saw the Cottage Grove goalie at super Series, I don't think she was the best goalie on that team. Thats just an opinion. I am not familiar w/ any other of the goalies by name. Maybe Allen couldn't attend the next phase or something. She is a quality goalie.
Bensonmum
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:22 pm

Post by Bensonmum »

I think the only post deleted was mine and I did it myself. I hadn't observed the 24-hour rule.
My conclusion is that there must be a non-hockey explanation, like scheduling conflict, etc.
Good point about Jenna Boss too--she could easily be on this list. She might be a 16 though.
ron123
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:38 am

Post by ron123 »

Bensonmum wrote:I think the only post deleted was mine and I did it myself. I hadn't observed the 24-hour rule.
My conclusion is that there must be a non-hockey explanation, like scheduling conflict, etc.
Good point about Jenna Boss too--she could easily be on this list. She might be a 16 though.
Unfortunately there was not a scheduling conflict.
goalzilla
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:34 am

Post by goalzilla »

I wasn't at any of the U15 tryouts this year to witness, unfortunately for some players who played well all season they may have not shown well at the phase tryouts. Look at U17 for example, Sobczak didnt move on to Phase 3? I thought there were a few suprises this year at all age levels.
Hansonbrother
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:28 pm

Post by Hansonbrother »

Bensonmum wrote:I think the only post deleted was mine and I did it myself. I hadn't observed the 24-hour rule.
My conclusion is that there must be a non-hockey explanation, like scheduling conflict, etc.
Good point about Jenna Boss too--she could easily be on this list. She might be a 16 though.
I believe Boss is a U-16 and didn't make it past the first phase. Hard to believe. She's as good as they come.
MNhockeylover
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:53 pm

Post by MNhockeylover »

Hansonbrother wrote:
Bensonmum wrote:I think the only post deleted was mine and I did it myself. I hadn't observed the 24-hour rule.
My conclusion is that there must be a non-hockey explanation, like scheduling conflict, etc.
Good point about Jenna Boss too--she could easily be on this list. She might be a 16 though.
I believe Boss is a U-16 and didn't make it past the first phase. Hard to believe. She's as good as they come.
boss is actually a U- 17 but a sophomore
Post Reply