Page 3 of 3
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:35 pm
by hockey55
In the west Blaine beat andover. Blaine beat moorhead. Moorhead beat EGF. Andover is beating EGF 3-1
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:46 pm
by Air Force 1
hockey55 wrote:In the west Blaine beat andover. Blaine beat moorhead. Moorhead beat EGF. Andover is beating EGF 3-1
EGF beat Andover 4-1
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:51 am
by hockey55
my bad other way around
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:06 pm
by hockey55
blaine is in championship, and egf. I heard that Moorhead got screwed over. From what I hear they lost 5-6 to andover which should of put them in the championship, but then the directer changed one of the rules... so the official rule book was wrong
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:37 pm
by clutchngrab
hockey55 wrote:blaine is in championship, and egf. I heard that Moorhead got screwed over. From what I hear they lost 5-6 to andover which should of put them in the championship, but then the directer changed one of the rules... so the official rule book was wrong
My gut tells me we are missing a few facts here. Can anyone shed some additional light on this?
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:53 pm
by hockey55
well The rules they gave at the tournament were not the same as online..(tiebreaking rules)
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:10 pm
by ACTUALFORMERPLAYER
hockey55 wrote:well The rules they gave at the tournament were not the same as online..(tiebreaking rules)
So what you are saying is somebody said the tie breaker rules were "this" and everybody took him at his word instead of checking the rule book. Doesn't seem controversial, just typical.
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 3:40 pm
by defense
hockey55 wrote:well The rules they gave at the tournament were not the same as online..(tiebreaking rules)
That first tie breaker is interesting isn't it???? It states" take points acquired in games between the tied teams, and only the tied teams. Does "points" mean goals or points as in two for a win.....??
It would have to mean points as in 2 points for a win...then they would still be tied. (Let's remember that the rules say "points acquired" not goals). The next step is goal differential in the games between tied teams, both Moorhead and East Grand Forks had +1. The third step is to divide total goals scored by total goals against in games played between the three tied teams. Moohead: 1.11 East Grand Forks 1.16. I don't know if I got this right, but it seems to be the only way this happened...
I'd be interested to know what "points" means....
There would've been a similar situation in the other pool if Fergus would've beaten Roseau. Elk River, Roseau, and Fergus would've been 2-1. All three would've won one game against another team that they are tied with giving them all 2 points in games played against eachother. Fergus Falls would've won out over Elk River because ER's goal differential would've been -1 and Fergus' would've been at leasts even.
One of the important things to remember is the game against Blaine, or the game against Brainerd in the other scenerio wouldn't count.
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:13 pm
by sssmack09
elliott70 wrote:East Grand Forks
I wonder where your from?
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:15 pm
by sssmack09
Fickalous_Nollmer wrote:Duluth East is the team to beat here. I mean you got a ton of talent top to bottom. Definetely my pick to win it all here!!
They are done...Grand Rapids beat them to go. 2-1.
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:25 pm
by ACTUALFORMERPLAYER
sssmack09 wrote:elliott70 wrote:East Grand Forks
I wonder where your from?
The four day school week in Warroad must not be working if you can't read Bemidji right under his name.
Cant make the tourney well you can watch it on MSBN
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:38 pm
by iwatchalotofhockey
Just and FYI MSBN has partnered with Minnesota Hockey once again this year to bring you coverage of 2 boys youth hockey state tourneys and 2 girls youth hockey state tourneys.
As an added bonus it is our goal to see about making video an option at the Richfield site this year for the Bantam A Tourney. So check out the schedule next week as we first have to make it through out MSHSL State Boys tourney coverage this week!
Looking forward to bringing you coverage again this year for the Minnesota Hockey State Youth Tourneys!!!
Its a great month for hockey on The Minnesota Sports Broadcast Network!
www.mnsportsnetwork.com
Thanks for your support everyone. Enjoy this lovely thing we call: March Madness!
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:50 pm
by hands of stone
i think that would be something special for these kids at the bantam A level if there games got to be watched online by people that werent able to get to the games
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:11 pm
by ponyboy30
Well ladies from the cities. Turns out sssmack was right. Duluth east was over rated from what I hear. Northern boys were spreading the rumor that east is not going to state. Is this true?!
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:52 pm
by Northernhockey11
Thats right duluth east isnt going!! sucks to be them, they're overrated. Cloquet and rapids will do well in state there both playing good hockey.
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:59 pm
by sssmack09
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:sssmack09 wrote:elliott70 wrote:East Grand Forks
I wonder where your from?
The four day school week in Warroad must not be working if you can't read Bemidji right under his name.
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:27 pm
by Leftwinger
sssmack09 wrote:ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:sssmack09 wrote: I wonder where your from?
The four day school week in Warroad must not be working if you can't read Bemidji right under his name.
I think Bemidji could take a few pointers from Warroad when it comes to hockey. So I wouldn't start in to hard.