HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

scorekeeper wrote:

JDUBBS1280 wrote: They're your "facts", back them up. Unless you can't because those facts are complete crap, then by all means don't

Not "my" facts. Just the FACTS. Here they are. Go nuts

www.hockeydb.com

I am very familiar with the website. Is that what you are going to use to substantiate your "facts"? We'll wait

If these are indeed "facts", you must have some ready to cite sources handy.

JDUBBS1280 wrote:

scorekeeper wrote:

JDUBBS1280 wrote:Funny. I have two cousins who played D1 hockey. One for Mankato, one for SCSU. Both had at least a half ride (one had 3/4) and both played 4 years.

Our family must have been lucky

Lucky? Maybe. Depends on if they were good enough for the CHL.

If they were, they could have got 7 years FULL RIDE. 2-3 years with the team and 4-5 years afterwards.

Probably not lucky. More like typical. Sorry you missed the sarcasm denoted by the

I don't miss your "sacrcasm". I just find you ignorant of the facts and I don't need smiley faces to make a point.

JDUBBS1280 wrote:

scorekeeper wrote:

JDUBBS1280 wrote: They're your "facts", back them up. Unless you can't because those facts are complete crap, then by all means don't

Not "my" facts. Just the FACTS. Here they are. Go nuts

www.hockeydb.com

I am very familiar with the website. Is that what you are going to use to substantiate your "facts"? We'll wait

I don't need to "use" anything. The facts are what the facts are. Go ahead and look it up. Or are you more comfortable just repeating what you've been told?

scorekeeper wrote:

JDUBBS1280 wrote:

scorekeeper wrote: Lucky? Maybe. Depends on if they were good enough for the CHL.

If they were, they could have got 7 years FULL RIDE. 2-3 years with the team and 4-5 years afterwards.

Probably not lucky. More like typical. Sorry you missed the sarcasm denoted by the

I don't miss your "sacrcasm". I just find you ignorant of the facts.

I find you oblivious to what "facts" really are. How ironic

JDUBBS1280 wrote:

scorekeeper wrote:

JDUBBS1280 wrote: Probably not lucky. More like typical. Sorry you missed the sarcasm denoted by the

I don't miss your "sacrcasm". I just find you ignorant of the facts.

I find you oblivious to what "facts" really are. How ironic

One difference though.

I KNOW what the facts are.

You THINK you know what the facts are.



Do those rolly eyes work for you?

scorekeeper wrote:

JDUBBS1280 wrote:

scorekeeper wrote: I don't miss your "sacrcasm". I just find you ignorant of the facts.

I find you oblivious to what "facts" really are. How ironic

One difference though.

I KNOW what the facts are.

You THINK you know what the facts are.



Do those rolly eyes work for you?

You "know" what the facts are, yet you can't cite any sources?

Hmmmmm.....