Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 8:11 pm
Wolff is just lighting up Cadets everywhere.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Accurate description I think. Should be an exciting finish!green4 wrote:after 2 periods the score is knotted at 2
Shots on goal in favor of STA 19-18
Eagan controlled more of the play this period. They are really throwing there weight around and I think that is getting in the Cadets heads a little bit, especially if Wolff is on the ice. The start of the period was all Eagan but then they took a penalty and gave up another powerplay goal.
After that it was pretty even till Eagan got there own powerplay and scored. They finished off the period with a slight advantage I think in play and with a goal in the final minute.
Should be a great 3rd
Nice game by the Wildcats! Good luck in St. Paul!green4 wrote:40 seconds left Eagan scores an empty net goal 4-2
Are you kidding? They just lost by one (plus an ENG) in the section final.BlueLineSpecial wrote: STA goes home, maybe questioning the jump a little? Big leagues too much?
Last four years:Bonin2121 wrote:Are you kidding? They just lost by one (plus an ENG) in the section final.BlueLineSpecial wrote: STA goes home, maybe questioning the jump a little? Big leagues too much?
Great post. Thank you.Cadets16 wrote:As a non-hockey playing Cadet, I will tell you what I think. This is just my opinion alone.
The 2013 team was probably the best team we've fielded in years. I feel they could have won the AA tournament last year.
However, the jump to AA is tricky. There is a double standard for us. If we win, private school dominance has too far, but if we lose then we "shouldn't have made the jump", even after everybody called for it. So it's a tricky situation. We can win another state tournament at the A level, or battle our way through AA to a section runner-up.
It will be interesting to see much of anything from STA next year. Rumors float that Novak and Versich may go to pursue junior hockey. I do know the JV team was very sophomore and freshmen heavy, so we shall see where that gets them next year, should they lose Novak and Versich.
Benilde and Hill already win it all, and we that hate privates just have to deal with it. There is zero way you should be in class A. You'll be competitive every year, and a lot of us are from AA schools that would kill to be in that position.Cadets16 wrote: However, the jump to AA is tricky. There is a double standard for us. If we win, private school dominance has too far, but if we lose then we "shouldn't have made the jump", even after everybody called for it.
Yep. Nuff saidSats81 wrote:Eagan 4-2
I'm not saying we should be in class A at all. I do agree we belong in AA, but it would be naive to say that a double standard doesn't exist.Bonin2121 wrote:Benilde and Hill already win it all, and we that hate privates just have to deal with it. There is zero way you should be in class A. You'll be competitive every year, and a lot of us are from AA schools that would kill to be in that position.
You forgot that it's not a double standard, Cadet16, it's a triple standard: the two you listed and the third..."there will be those that hate ya no matter what!"Bonin2121 wrote:Benilde and Hill already win it all, and we that hate privates just have to deal with it. There is zero way you should be in class A. You'll be competitive every year, and a lot of us are from AA schools that would kill to be in that position.Cadets16 wrote: However, the jump to AA is tricky. There is a double standard for us. If we win, private school dominance has too far, but if we lose then we "shouldn't have made the jump", even after everybody called for it.
Well ya I mean where is your best player from? Lol people will always hate you. Bummer.Cadets16 wrote: I'm not saying we should be in class A at all. I do agree we belong in AA, but it would be naive to say that a double standard doesn't exist.
lol. Relevant point.Bonin2121 wrote:Well ya I mean where is your best player from? Lol people will always hate you. Bummer.Cadets16 wrote: I'm not saying we should be in class A at all. I do agree we belong in AA, but it would be naive to say that a double standard doesn't exist.