Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 10:53 pm
Duluth East looks completely discombobulated. Eagan with chance after chance.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Yep. 4 best teams in state.alcloseshaver wrote:Are we going to be left with 2 SSC and Lake conference teams?
And LN beat them twice.Sats81 wrote:Congrats to Eagan. What a game they played. Imposed their physical will. They will give Edina more than a handful tomorrow night. Nice to see 2 SSC teams in final 4
Even though I have Hornets for all the cheese, it would be exciting to see that.sagard wrote:This has been a fun run! Love to see them wear out Edina like they did East.
But is sure is tough to beat a team three out of three in a season. If LN and Eagan end up facing each other again, I like Eagan's chances.alcloseshaver wrote:And LN beat them twice.Sats81 wrote:Congrats to Eagan. What a game they played. Imposed their physical will. They will give Edina more than a handful tomorrow night. Nice to see 2 SSC teams in final 4
Edina is a cut above everyone else. There are other teams in the next group that could have done this.Sats81 wrote:Yep. 4 best teams in state.alcloseshaver wrote:Are we going to be left with 2 SSC and Lake conference teams?
Didn't Eagan beat Edina this year?alcloseshaver wrote:Edina is a cut above everyone else. There are other teams in the next group that could have done this.Sats81 wrote:Yep. 4 best teams in state.alcloseshaver wrote:Are we going to be left with 2 SSC and Lake conference teams?
Beat em 2-1.GloryDaze wrote:Didn't Eagan beat Edina this year?alcloseshaver wrote:Edina is a cut above everyone else. There are other teams in the next group that could have done this.Sats81 wrote: Yep. 4 best teams in state.
Ahh. So, losing to a team 2-1 = being a cut above them? Is that because of all the cake they eat? By "a cut above", did you mean a cut of a slice of cake?alcloseshaver wrote:Beat em 2-1.GloryDaze wrote:Didn't Eagan beat Edina this year?alcloseshaver wrote:Edina is a cut above everyone else. There are other teams in the next group that could have done this.
Game was on Dec. 7th, Cake is dialed in. Like Lou would say about the North Stars "to much talent"GloryDaze wrote:Ahh. So, losing to a team 2-1 = being a cut above them? Is that because of all the cake they eat? By "a cut above", did you mean a cut of a slice of cake?alcloseshaver wrote:Beat em 2-1.GloryDaze wrote: Didn't Eagan beat Edina this year?
Whatever gets you through the night.alcloseshaver wrote:Game was on Dec. 7th, Cake is dialed in. Like Lou would say about the North Stars "to much talent"GloryDaze wrote:Ahh. So, losing to a team 2-1 = being a cut above them? Is that because of all the cake they eat? By "a cut above", did you mean a cut of a slice of cake?alcloseshaver wrote:Beat em 2-1.
Okay, so I'm almostawake enough (or is that almostsober enough?) to dive back onto the board for a bit....InYourFace09 wrote:First time seeing Eagan this year. Are Wolfe and Muck always getting that much ice time every game?
Seemed like they were just rotating 3 D men, mixing #22 in when they needed a breather. TV timeouts really seemed to keep them on the ice.
On that topic I wonder if Giles will keep rolling lines. Did he only do that last night due to the lead or has he changed his style from a few years ago when the third line hardly saw the ice, far less any fourth line?almostashappy wrote:Okay, so I'm almostawake enough (or is that almostsober enough?) to dive back onto the board for a bit....InYourFace09 wrote:First time seeing Eagan this year. Are Wolfe and Muck always getting that much ice time every game?
Seemed like they were just rotating 3 D men, mixing #22 in when they needed a breather. TV timeouts really seemed to keep them on the ice.
The TV timeouts allowed all of the Tourney teams to keep their best players on the ice for disproportionate amounts of time...how long were the Poehling brothers and Yon on the ice yesterday afternoon? And since they'll still have commercials during tonight's game, wouldn't be surprised to see more of the same.
It was not a shot a Eagan, relax. Even without the TV timeouts, it seemed as though they were taking 2-3 minute shifts regularly. I know for a fact their 4th D-men didnt see much ice. Maybe 2-3 shifts a period.almostashappy wrote:Okay, so I'm almostawake enough (or is that almostsober enough?) to dive back onto the board for a bit....InYourFace09 wrote:First time seeing Eagan this year. Are Wolfe and Muck always getting that much ice time every game?
Seemed like they were just rotating 3 D men, mixing #22 in when they needed a breather. TV timeouts really seemed to keep them on the ice.
The TV timeouts allowed all of the Tourney teams to keep their best players on the ice for disproportionate amounts of time...how long were the Poehling brothers and Yon on the ice yesterday afternoon? And since they'll still have commercials during tonight's game, wouldn't be surprised to see more of the same.