Page 3 of 6

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:48 pm
by wblhockguy06
well thats it folks 3-2 final, more dumb penalties kill the bears

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:49 pm
by Neutron 14
Nothing left to do but blame the Ref's, opposing coaches, 4th stringers...

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:53 pm
by DAbears25
Whats new? penalties kill the bears..... :roll:

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:53 pm
by BIAFP
[quote="Neutron 14"]Nothing left to do but blame the Ref's


You can't blame the refs because they went to Hill ! :P

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:54 pm
by Ankles Pierre, Jr.
Neutron 14 wrote:Nothing left to do but blame the Ref's, opposing coaches, 4th stringers...
leftout: curses from God and recruiting

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:00 pm
by wbmd
8 losses on the season now. Probably at least 4 more coming before the regular season is done. They'll probably get swept by Cretin and Roseville and Woodbury has a good chance of beating the Bears again as well.

HOW ABOUT DUMPING SAGER NOW

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:02 pm
by Neutron 14
I KNOW a cetain CDH assistant would love "coming home".

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:04 pm
by wbmd
Neutron 14 wrote:I KNOW a cetain CDH assistant would love "coming home".
It would be nice having him at White Bear! He seemed to have done a good job when he used to coach White Bear's bantams as well.

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:08 pm
by wbmd
Just 5 more losses for the Bears and they're guaranteed of finishing the regular season under .500.

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:08 pm
by BIAFP
Neutron 14 wrote:I KNOW a cetain CDH assistant would love "coming home".
So it is not just the players that get recruited to the private schools? Coaches too, what's next cheerleaders?

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:17 pm
by Pioneerprideguy
Nice win for Hill as it's always nice to beat the Bears. I gotta believe Lech will have the boys working on that powerplay just a tad. Having Westerhaus back helped solidify the lines today.

Quick question to WB people. A couple of weeks ago I grabbed a Let's Play Hockey and noticed that there wasn't a WB team in the top 20 in the Bantam A's. Was this a misprint or is WB down at that level this year?

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:31 pm
by eastsidepride
Hill doesn't have any D players capable of captaining the power play and it's killing them against good teams. They need to move Larson back to the point on their power play like they did earlier in the season.

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:33 pm
by ChrisK
BIAFP wrote:
Neutron 14 wrote:I KNOW a cetain CDH assistant would love "coming home".
So it is not just the players that get recruited to the private schools? Coaches too, what's next cheerleaders?
Why do you think Holy Angels' cheerleaders are all so hot? They can even spell with their pom poms.

It'll be a real conundrum for the MSHSL when they start recruiting Zamboni drivers.

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:35 pm
by SEC Scotty
eastsidepride wrote:Hill doesn't have any D players capable of captaining the power play and it's killing them against good teams. They need to move Larson back to the point on their power play like they did earlier in the season.
I won't blame the referees, dumb penalties, recruiting, or Lechners's ugly sweaters. I will say Hill Murray is the most overated team in the state. I agree their defense is average at best.

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:36 pm
by stars612
SEC Scotty wrote:
eastsidepride wrote:Hill doesn't have any D players capable of captaining the power play and it's killing them against good teams. They need to move Larson back to the point on their power play like they did earlier in the season.
I won't blame the blame the referees, dumb penalties, recruiting, or Lechners's ugly sweaters. I will say Hill Murray is the most overated team in the state. I agree their defense is average at best.
How do you blame the blame... :)

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:38 pm
by SEC Scotty
stars612 wrote:
SEC Scotty wrote:
eastsidepride wrote:Hill doesn't have any D players capable of captaining the power play and it's killing them against good teams. They need to move Larson back to the point on their power play like they did earlier in the season.
I won't blame the referees, dumb penalties, recruiting, or Lechners's ugly sweaters. I will say Hill Murray is the most overated team in the state. I agree their defense is average at best.
How do you blame the blame... :)

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:58 pm
by Zeke16
Seems to me Da Bears had plenty of chance to keep "the coach". Funny how when someone does well they were all of sudden "recruited".

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:11 pm
by Neutron 14
Zeke16 wrote:Seems to me Da Bears had plenty of chance to keep "the coach". Funny how when someone does well they were all of sudden "recruited".
The only shot they had at "the coach" is when WB hired Butters. WB's teachers contract states that they must hire a teacher if he's qualified. I think most Cities teachers contracts have this clause. The school board deemed Sager qualified. When Butters was hired it was after the prior coach resigned/was fired (midseason?) and they were somehow able to insert (non-teacher)Butters.

HM - WBL

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:39 pm
by stpaul
White Bear should be happy about losing to Hill-Murray today and going 0-2 against them in the regular season. History says this means they will go to the State Tournament. Of course they will lose there in the first round.

For the record: HM is now 41-20-1 all time against WBL and has won 6 of the last 7. WBL will have to go on a 21 game win streak to catch up.

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:41 pm
by WBLM
Hill is pathetic. They dive more than any other team i've seen play. I could count atleast 8, and 3 or so got called penalties against WBL.

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:59 pm
by WBJG-4-life
Quick question to WB people. A couple of weeks ago I grabbed a Let's Play Hockey and noticed that there wasn't a WB team in the top 20 in the Bantam A's. Was this a misprint or is WB down at that level this year?
It seems that WB is down in most levels of play and in numbers for the older kids.

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:19 pm
by sachishi4
good win for hill today, cant wait for the sconny kids to be activated

And Peewees

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:25 pm
by Ankles Pierre, Jr.
Even though Hill has no Bantam team, we recruit them from WBL just out of spite!

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 8:38 pm
by chedderhead69
Is Sconny a last name or is he a kid from Wisconsin?

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 8:44 pm
by Ankles Pierre, Jr.
chedderhead69 wrote:Is Sconny a last name or is he a kid from Wisconsin?
Just want to clear up: Chedd is no relation to AP nor to anyone at Hill-Murray!