HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Art=BAD_ICE wrote:Should be a great game to watch tonight. Both teams playing well, the rivalry and all. Should be entertaining.

I hope so. I got permission from the kitchen staff to dine in the televsion room.

elliott70 wrote:

Art=BAD_ICE wrote:Should be a great game to watch tonight. Both teams playing well, the rivalry and all. Should be entertaining.

I hope so. I got permission from the kitchen staff to dine in the televsion room.

Was it actually permission, or were they actually happy to see you go?

TTpuckster wrote:

elliott70 wrote:

Art=BAD_ICE wrote:Should be a great game to watch tonight. Both teams playing well, the rivalry and all. Should be entertaining.

I hope so. I got permission from the kitchen staff to dine in the televsion room.

Was it actually permission, or were they actually happy to see you go?

I'll ask her.

6 hours and counting....FSN North

My take on the game is that ros. by far had the better skaters. ros. did take things for granted in the 3rd though and started to take some dumb penalties to let it get close.

Thurs Jan 10

Detroit Lakes (#113) @ Red Lake Falls (#136)
Thief River Falls (#76) @ Crookston (#107)
Wadena-Deer Creek (#130) @ Park Rapids (#74) Fourteen in a row happens tonight

Winners tonight Jan 10

DL
TRF
PR

Irishmans Shanty wrote:Thurs Jan 10

Detroit Lakes (#113) @ Red Lake Falls (#136)
Thief River Falls (#76) @ Crookston (#107)
Wadena-Deer Creek (#130) @ Park Rapids (#74) Fourteen in a row happens tonight

DL by 3
TRF by 3
Wadena by 1

DL by 4

TRF by 1

PR by 3

SiouxRecruit wrote:DL by 4

TRF by 1

PR by 3

Sue, you pick PR every game!

why wouldn't you?? They are going to go undefeated don't cha know!

elliott70 wrote:

SiouxRecruit wrote:DL by 4

TRF by 1

PR by 3

Sue, you pick PR every game!

Maybe sue won't come Jan 24th.

elliott70 wrote:

SiouxRecruit wrote:DL by 4

TRF by 1

PR by 3

Sue, you pick PR every game!

Well i just found out some special players from Wadena are out tonight...im not sure what the rule is on saying things...but they are special/important....and they are not playing...which could pissibly hurt Wadena..

and of course I pick PR to win EVERY game...only because I think they will win every game.....comon now Elliot

TTpuckster wrote:

elliott70 wrote:

SiouxRecruit wrote:DL by 4

TRF by 1

PR by 3

Sue, you pick PR every game!

Maybe sue won't come Jan 24th.

Oh I will be there.... ...Im not gonna miss a "W" vs TRF

This post was meant for the other thread, but the Warroad's of the world will NEVER schedule PR even if they beat them 2-3 years in a row in the 8A playoffs. Pick something else to talk about...like playing in the big tourney like STA should be...

any one have any details on this wadena pr game.

Shots?

Scoring summary?

what they thought of the game?

4-3 in ot. i'd be embarressed to be PR right now

any one have any details on this wadena pr game.

Shots?

Scoring summary?

what they thought of the game?

4-3 in ot. i'd be embarressed to be PR right now

first that wont happen. but if pr was good more then one year in a row then yes they would.

SB24 wrote:first that wont happen. but if pr was good more then one year in a row then yes they would.

I'm telling you, they really aren't that MUCH better this year than the past 3-4...I just wish people would realize this...

sinbombyzermancurve wrote:any one have any details on this wadena pr game.

Shots?

Scoring summary?

what they thought of the game?

4-3 in ot. i'd be embarressed to be PR right now

Scoring for PR was

Naeve
Kent
Coborn
McMorrow game winner

Not sure about Wadena...and why should they be embarassed....u think after a game winner with 3 seconds left in OT they feel embarassed?...Probably NOT .....in the end a win is a win.....


now 14-0-0...

SB24 wrote:first that wont happen. but if pr was good more then one year in a row then yes they would.

I dont agree at all....why...becuase you dont know..

SiouxRecruit wrote:

sinbombyzermancurve wrote:any one have any details on this wadena pr game.

Shots?

Scoring summary?

what they thought of the game?

4-3 in ot. i'd be embarressed to be PR right now

Scoring for PR was

Naeve
Kent
Coborn
McMorrow game winner

Not sure about Wadena...and why should they be embarassed....u think after a game winner with 3 seconds left in OT they feel embarassed?...Probably NOT .....in the end a win is a win.....


now 14-0-0...

First...naeve scored is this correct, not that he is a bad player, just havent seen him play much.

why should pr be embarrest, well wadena comes into your own barn and you only beat them by a goal in OT.

Soiux i dunno how much hockey knowledge you have, but wadena couldnt crack the top 6 seeds in section 8. PR beat them 8-2 in wadena. And you tell me they shouldnt be a bit embarressed.

From what i have seen in the very few games i have watched pr,(EGF, Northern lakes, Hallock maybe one other) i believe that pr is a top 4 seed team in this section. But..beating wadena 4-3 in ot in your own barn is an embarressment for a team that is gonna want to get a top 3 seed come seeding meeting. The other coaches will have to take into consideration some other scores because of the fact that pr doesnt play everyone in the section and many of the teams they play arent on their schedule twice.

Lastly if warroad, egf, trf and maybe bemidji played wadena it would be pretty ugly

sinbombyzermancurve wrote:

SiouxRecruit wrote:

sinbombyzermancurve wrote:any one have any details on this wadena pr game.

Shots?

Scoring summary?

what they thought of the game?

4-3 in ot. i'd be embarressed to be PR right now

Scoring for PR was

Naeve
Kent
Coborn
McMorrow game winner

Not sure about Wadena...and why should they be embarassed....u think after a game winner with 3 seconds left in OT they feel embarassed?...Probably NOT .....in the end a win is a win.....


now 14-0-0...

First...naeve scored is this correct, not that he is a bad player, just havent seen him play much.

why should pr be embarrest, well wadena comes into your own barn and you only beat them by a goal in OT.

Soiux i dunno how much hockey knowledge you have, but wadena couldnt crack the top 6 seeds in section 8. PR beat them 8-2 in wadena. And you tell me they shouldnt be a bit embarressed.

From what i have seen in the very few games i have watched pr,(EGF, Northern lakes, Hallock maybe one other) i believe that pr is a top 4 seed team in this section. But..beating wadena 4-3 in ot in your own barn is an embarressment for a team that is gonna want to get a top 3 seed come seeding meeting. The other coaches will have to take into consideration some other scores because of the fact that pr doesnt play everyone in the section and many of the teams they play arent on their schedule twice.

Lastly if warroad, egf, trf and maybe bemidji played wadena it would be pretty ugly

And PR beat EGF if their own barn...what's your point? The TRF game will be the game to watch...

schwang17 wrote:

sinbombyzermancurve wrote:

SiouxRecruit wrote:
Scoring for PR was

Naeve
Kent
Coborn
McMorrow game winner

Not sure about Wadena...and why should they be embarassed....u think after a game winner with 3 seconds left in OT they feel embarassed?...Probably NOT .....in the end a win is a win.....


now 14-0-0...

First...naeve scored is this correct, not that he is a bad player, just havent seen him play much.

why should pr be embarrest, well wadena comes into your own barn and you only beat them by a goal in OT.

Soiux i dunno how much hockey knowledge you have, but wadena couldnt crack the top 6 seeds in section 8. PR beat them 8-2 in wadena. And you tell me they shouldnt be a bit embarressed.

From what i have seen in the very few games i have watched pr,(EGF, Northern lakes, Hallock maybe one other) i believe that pr is a top 4 seed team in this section. But..beating wadena 4-3 in ot in your own barn is an embarressment for a team that is gonna want to get a top 3 seed come seeding meeting. The other coaches will have to take into consideration some other scores because of the fact that pr doesnt play everyone in the section and many of the teams they play arent on their schedule twice.

Lastly if warroad, egf, trf and maybe bemidji played wadena it would be pretty ugly

And PR beat EGF if their own barn...what's your point? The TRF game will be the game to watch...

not too tough to figure out.

both the EGF and wadena games go into OT. Wadena couldnt tie the skates for the EGF club. Obviously pr isnt playing the type of hockey they were earlier

but i do agree in that PR vs trf will show were both teams

schwang17 wrote:

sinbombyzermancurve wrote:

SiouxRecruit wrote:
Scoring for PR was

Naeve
Kent
Coborn
McMorrow game winner

Not sure about Wadena...and why should they be embarassed....u think after a game winner with 3 seconds left in OT they feel embarassed?...Probably NOT .....in the end a win is a win.....


now 14-0-0...

First...naeve scored is this correct, not that he is a bad player, just havent seen him play much.

why should pr be embarrest, well wadena comes into your own barn and you only beat them by a goal in OT.

Soiux i dunno how much hockey knowledge you have, but wadena couldnt crack the top 6 seeds in section 8. PR beat them 8-2 in wadena. And you tell me they shouldnt be a bit embarressed.

From what i have seen in the very few games i have watched pr,(EGF, Northern lakes, Hallock maybe one other) i believe that pr is a top 4 seed team in this section. But..beating wadena 4-3 in ot in your own barn is an embarressment for a team that is gonna want to get a top 3 seed come seeding meeting. The other coaches will have to take into consideration some other scores because of the fact that pr doesnt play everyone in the section and many of the teams they play arent on their schedule twice.

Lastly if warroad, egf, trf and maybe bemidji played wadena it would be pretty ugly

And PR beat EGF if their own barn...what's your point? The TRF game will be the game to watch...

Bla, Bla, Bla.....what is the difference? Just bottom feeders fighting for bottom spots