Page 4 of 10
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:58 pm
by MNscout72
I'm was also trying to view them and got the same result.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:45 pm
by Observer85
breakout wrote:Any idea who the pro scouts were looking at? Speculation?
Having been around these guys for the past 4 years, my guess they are looking at the kids with birthdays before September 15, 1990. All 1988's, 1989's and the 9+ months of 1990's are eligible for next June's NHL draft. But the focus is primarily on the 1990's.
Most likely they have the initial Central Scouting combine list that lists players as "A" players (candidates for the first 3 rounds) or "B" players (candidates that could be drafted if they continue to progress throughout the hockey season). This list will be made available to the public sometime in October.
After this, they are also taking notes on the next group the 9-15-1991's for the 2009 draft.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:21 pm
by pioneers
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:48 pm
by davey
Looking at all the stats i see Michael Webb has not played. Is he injured?
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:54 pm
by quickgym guy
Looks like Hanowski doesn't need Festler to score...
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:42 pm
by breakout
quickgym guy wrote:
Looks like Hanowski doesn't need Festler to score...
Plus he is playing with and against tough competition.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:01 pm
by Hockey=Life
I'm assuming that was sarcastic, Team north won 14-0 and that's where kids can rack up points. A couple teams I noticed don't even play Norway. Just mu opinion but Norway didn't come close in any games and it was a points game kids wanted to play.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:05 pm
by breakout
Hockey=Life wrote:I'm assuming that was sarcastic, Team north won 14-0 and that's where kids can rack up points. A couple teams I noticed don't even play Norway. Just mu opinion but Norway didn't come close in any games and it was a points game kids wanted to play.
Actually, I was not being sarcastic. I did heard the Norway team was brutal. Many kids racked up points vs. those guys. Heard one kid got 5 of his 7 points vs. them.
Did all teams play against them to even things out?
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:22 pm
by suntzu
No, not all of the teams played against Norway. North played Norway twice while Southeast and Northwest didn't play them at all. The team from Norway was extremely weak and would have trouble against many HS teams in the winter, let alone teams in the Elite League.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:37 pm
by breakout
Some stats may be a bit tainted???
Like they taint as good as you might think.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:44 pm
by Blue&Gold
breakout wrote:Some stats may be a bit tainted???
Like they taint as good as you might think.
That's funny!!
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:26 pm
by Hockey=Life
Sounds pretty unfair to me, every team should play them one time and no one shoud for sure not play them twice. North has more players in the top 9 because they had the easy schedual.
I wouldn't recomend Norway to be back next year.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:57 pm
by Gopher Blog
Hockey=Life wrote:North has more players in the top 9 because they had the easy schedule.
I wouldn't worry too much about who is ranked where in the stats in this league. I realize some people get caught up in that stuff but the people who matter (scouts, coaches) don't skim the surface like that when they come to their conclusions.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:49 am
by breakout
Gopher Blog wrote:Hockey=Life wrote:North has more players in the top 9 because they had the easy schedule.
I wouldn't worry too much about who is ranked where in the stats in this league. I realize some people get caught up in that stuff but the people who matter (scouts, coaches) don't skim the surface like that when they come to their conclusions.
I have to believe you are correct.
In my opinion, one of the most telling stats along with points is plus/minus. NHL types talk about that all of the time in the media.
In the games I saw, some of the D acted like wings more than D. Some of the forwards wouldn't back check all the way into the zone and were quick to transition toward the offensive zone.
Elite League
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:11 am
by northwoods oldtimer
In the games I saw, some of the D acted like wings more than D. Some of the forwards wouldn't back check all the way into the zone and were quick to transition toward the offensive zone.
breakout those must be the kids who are still getting a 5 spot for assists and a ten spot for goals from delusional dads.
Re: Elite League
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:26 am
by Can't Never Tried
northwoods oldtimer wrote:In the games I saw, some of the D acted like wings more than D. Some of the forwards wouldn't back check all the way into the zone and were quick to transition toward the offensive zone.
breakout those must be the kids who are still getting a 5 spot for assists and a ten spot for goals from delusional dads.
Whahahahahah
Nice!
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:10 am
by Blue&Gold
Hockey=Life wrote:Sounds pretty unfair to me, every team should play them one time and no one shoud for sure not play them twice. North has more players in the top 9 because they had the easy schedual.
I wouldn't recomend Norway to be back next year.
Kind of like regular high school hockey, eh? Some teams play dismall teams and get high stats for some players. Just sayin'
Don't sweat this kind of stuff, the the people who matter don't care, and the people who care don't matter.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:13 pm
by Art=BAD_ICE
[quote="Blue&Gold"][quote="Hockey=Life"]Sounds pretty unfair to me, every team should play them one time and no one shoud for sure not play them twice. North has more players in the top 9 because they had the easy schedual.
I wouldn't recomend Norway to be back next year.[/quote]
Kind of like regular high school hockey, eh? Some teams play dismall teams and get high stats for some players. Just sayin' :roll:
[color=red][b]Don't sweat this kind of stuff, the the people who matter don't care, and the people who care don't matter.[/quote][/b][/color]
No one could have put it better than this ^
Re: Elite League
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:55 pm
by breakout
northwoods oldtimer wrote:In the games I saw, some of the D acted like wings more than D. Some of the forwards wouldn't back check all the way into the zone and were quick to transition toward the offensive zone.
breakout those must be the kids who are still getting a 5 spot for assists and a ten spot for goals from delusional dads.
Good one
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 4:13 pm
by pioneers
Wisconsin 7 Northwest 2
Northeast 8 North 2
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:30 pm
by BC Guy
Anyone have any more of this weekend's scores?
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:31 pm
by pioneers
Friday Night Shattuck 5 Southwest 0
Tonight
Wisconsin 6 Southwest 5
Shattuck 9 Northwest 1
North 4 Southeast 4
Great Plains 7 Northeast 6
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:51 pm
by BC Guy
Thank you so much. It seems hard to find scores right away after the games have been played. They are good at posting them come Monday after the weekend.
Thanks again.
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:53 pm
by pioneers
Your welcome.
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:54 pm
by BC Guy
Did anyone see Shattuck play? How do they look?