Page 4 of 6

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:18 am
by Soulforged
mnticketbroker wrote:if #5 is playing a district 6 team , he may show " hey this kid has some skills" if he is playing Albert Lea or New Prague the coach may say "oh one more thing, lets stop #5"

Fairbault ( dirtiest team in the state) and Prague will get pounded by any of the district 6 teams in regions, and #5 would still be getting 3 shifts a game on one of these teams.
These are 11 and 12 year old kids you are calling "dirty". The Faribault kids are no different than any other team.

Re: ctbrow1

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:22 am
by Soulforged
council member retired wrote:faribault DOES NOT have a best 100 peewee player in the state. I will leave it at that since these kids are under 14.. YOU ARE WRONG.

They do have 10 of the dirtiest 100 players. toucha
Since these kids are under 14 you take the high ground, but you go on to call them "dirty". Are you retired or retarded?

Re: ctbrow1

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:41 am
by Bronc
Soulforged wrote:
council member retired wrote:faribault DOES NOT have a best 100 peewee player in the state. I will leave it at that since these kids are under 14.. YOU ARE WRONG.

They do have 10 of the dirtiest 100 players. toucha
Since these kids are under 14 you take the high ground, but you go on to call them "dirty". Are you retired or retarded?
This whole thread should have a disclaimer that you can't self - promote or put your own player on the pedestal.

It gets ridiculous reading the selfing grandizing (sp?) or bating for compliments.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:49 pm
by DKS1962
I agree with bronc...But once in a while you play a team that has a player that stands out above the rest.. I don't have a problem with
recogcnizing such a player

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:27 pm
by Bronc
DKS1962 wrote:I agree with bronc...But once in a while you play a team that has a player that stands out above the rest.. I don't have a problem with
recogcnizing such a player
I agree with that as well when you are recognizing top talent on an opposing team.

That is a compliment to them, but to self proclaim or look for compliments is inappropriate at best.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:03 pm
by ctbrow1
just as a disclaimer, #5 from faribault is NOT on my squad. he was an opponent against us. and my measuring stick is that my team has played apple valley, nsp, woodbury and rosemount...and a-rod is better than the top player on each of these teams. these 4 teams have for sure top 10 players in the state at the peewee level.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:04 pm
by BigD93
Willie Raskob #11 hastings.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:13 pm
by North9
Tyler Goodrie #7 Virginia

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:55 pm
by STickem
Bart Simpson #1 springfield

Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:56 pm
by steveperry91
Jake Bishoff hands down! He has size,speed,hands,and knows when too rush the puck and when not too. He is one of the few Pwee A skilled defensmen who don't try too do it all by themselves and knows how too play solid "D". His dad taught him how too play his position right.

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:40 am
by lamplighter
steveperry91 Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:56 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jake Bishoff hands down! He has size,speed,hands,and knows when too rush the puck and when not too. He is one of the few Pwee A skilled defensmen who don't try too do it all by themselves and knows how too play solid "D". His dad taught him how too play his position right.

... and now if somebody could teach his PR person proper grammar; the use of "to" versus "too" is an easy fix. When "to" use it properly is not "too" trying. Is that asking too much? :)

By the way, it is not "who don't" (which is who do not); it's "who doesn't" (which is who does not).

Typical Iron Range dialect, but you "juss gotta love dem folks up der to the nort".

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:49 pm
by Fiveh0le10
Jared Ridge #5 on Minnetonka

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:06 pm
by oldtimer64
Fiveh0le10 wrote:Jared Ridge #5 on Minnetonka
Not even the best player on the Tonka team. #19 is the best player on that team no question.

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:10 pm
by clickclick
Half of the 94 Fire team is Peewees. I dont think anyone could even compare to those kids.

Also, the 95 Fire kids. #12, dont know his name, but is from Maple Grove. The kid gets about 5 points a game, at AAA level.

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:48 pm
by 5thgraders
[quote="clickclick"]Half of the 94 Fire team is Peewees. I dont think anyone could even compare to those kids.

Also, the 95 Fire kids. #12, dont know his name, but is from Maple Grove. The kid gets about 5 points a game, at AAA level.[/quote]

You do not want to let the secret out it could hurt Minnesota
Hockeys feelings. SHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:46 pm
by steveperry91
omg lamplighter who actually cares? get a life. this is to talk about hockey and you have to talk about speech seriously? wow that's ridiculous

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:48 pm
by steveperry91
i'm sorry i didn't think i was writing an english paper! This is a hockey forum u idiot and u obviously don't know anything about hockey so u shouldn't come back on

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:07 pm
by penman
Stevie... If you are going to bust other's chops on the board from time to time, you best be prepared to be knocked around (and laugh at yourself) a bit too. A little fun enlightenment with wordmanship no matter what the venue never hurts. Think twice before you "wright"! :idea: When your singing days with Journey are over, your future job could depend on it. Relax & have fun.

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:04 pm
by slapshot88
Zach LaValle NSP #7 best player. #9 on woodbury is good. Guentzel??

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:11 pm
by hockeyman95
hudson fasching

Best Peewee A player

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:19 pm
by dzonecoverage
Fasching Apple Valley
#11 Eden Prairie
#2 Chaska

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:22 pm
by hockeyman95
hudson fasching

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 9:08 pm
by state_of_hockey
I played against LaValle last year and he is pretty good but he isnt spectacular.

Johnson from hill is the brother of a kid on my brothers team and he is HUGE. I havent seen him play though

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:54 pm
by hockeyman95
Hudson Fasching

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:48 pm
by Nobodyonya
Pretty tough to make a accurate assumption on who is the best A Peewee
hockey player at this age. Players peak and grow at different stages. Take Fasching for example he has been going thru growth spurts like no other players. All of a sudden he will hit the skids and will watch the other kids catch up or go right by. Size makes a difference at this level of play and he should be more dominant than the others. I would tend to vote more likely on a player that has not reached his growth potential yet and watch them improve within the next years. He is in his glorious years now, but later he will be looking back