Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:54 am
STA will choke on all the pucks flingin at 'em....but will win because unlike little falls, they will get a goal or two.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Bad idea. No more jumping ship from school to school. They will start coming back down to earth with this years no better than second place finish.droppin'gloves wrote:I completely agree. If they continue to have the same success for a couple more years, then they should absolutely move up to AA. Everyone seems to forget that they have had 5 state tournament appearances all time. All of them since 1999 and only one state championship. Let's all wait and see if the glory days continue after this years seniors graduate.GopherPuckPlayer wrote:I hear you no excuses, but I think STA has to man up here in a few years, and step up to AA, then we can see what they are actually made of.droppin'gloves wrote:Ahh....that's cute. You guys can debate and hypothesize all you want about how good your 2nd and 3rd lines are. No amount of school spirit can erase the fact that Little Falls basically plays a Bantam schedule. Forgive me if I'm not blown away by your glorious victories over Wadena-Deer Creek, ROCORI, and Sartell. Little Falls made it to the tourney fair and square, but before we start etching your name on the trophy why don't you guys compare schedules and admit you are fighting an up hill battle against a top tier team.
What's a bad idea? STA moving up? I don't think they should go anywhere right now. However, if they continue to make the tourney for the next 4-5 years, then they probably should move up to AA. It is too soon to say. Like I said before, until STA proves they can be good after the seniors leave they are fine right where they are.dherman8 wrote:Bad idea. No more jumping ship from school to school. They will start coming back down to earth with this years no better than second place finish.droppin'gloves wrote:I completely agree. If they continue to have the same success for a couple more years, then they should absolutely move up to AA. Everyone seems to forget that they have had 5 state tournament appearances all time. All of them since 1999 and only one state championship. Let's all wait and see if the glory days continue after this years seniors graduate.GopherPuckPlayer wrote: I hear you no excuses, but I think STA has to man up here in a few years, and step up to AA, then we can see what they are actually made of.
brucey, I am shocked that you are actually defending Little Fallsbruce06 wrote:HasNoMoves. This game will not be a blowout. It will be a close game. As much as I dislike little falls, they are a good team with a very strong top line that can play with almost anyline, A or AA with the exception of probably edina and roseau. This game will be a 2 goal game which can go either way. STA is the better team with more balance and depth, but Little falls is kind of playing like they have something to prove to the state because of people like you.
LF is a bad team, did you fall on your head? The won the Central Lakes Conference title and went undefeated in 6A going 11-0 and now are on a 17 game winning streak.Mcdangler12 wrote:This will not be a close game.... STA is gonna DO WORK!!!!! LF and litch are 2 bad teams from 2 horrible sections that shouldnt even exist!!!!!!!
My prediction STA 7, LF 2
The Duluth Marshall/Mankato West game will be more of a blow out than this one.HasNoMoves wrote:BrokenBat.....i wasnt comparing Litch and Little Falls...my point is that in Class A, every year there are 2 first round games that are a complete waste because the "other" teams...int his case litch, and LF, have absolutely no chance at winning, and it will more than likely be an embarrassing blow out for class A....these match ups are what make people not think highly of the two class system. You are an idiot for not being able to comprehend what I was saying.
hes telling you the section shouldn't exist...then you told him about how lf went undefeated in the conference....isn't the conference part of the section??? good rebuttle "mvp"ap4mvp wrote:LF is a bad team, did you fall on your head? The won the Central Lakes Conference title and went undefeated in 6A going 11-0 and now are on a 17 game winning streak.Mcdangler12 wrote:This will not be a close game.... STA is gonna DO WORK!!!!! LF and litch are 2 bad teams from 2 horrible sections that shouldnt even exist!!!!!!!
My prediction STA 7, LF 2
actually Little Falls did not go undefeated in the conference and the conference is not the same as the section otherwise they would've been undefeated in the conference wich they were not. Here's a question brainiak: without looking who is in the Central Lakes Conference and Section 6A?????tbvdaost wrote:hes telling you the section shouldn't exist...then you told him about how lf went undefeated in the conference....isn't the conference part of the section??? good rebuttle "mvp"ap4mvp wrote:LF is a bad team, did you fall on your head? The won the Central Lakes Conference title and went undefeated in 6A going 11-0 and now are on a 17 game winning streak.Mcdangler12 wrote:This will not be a close game.... STA is gonna DO WORK!!!!! LF and litch are 2 bad teams from 2 horrible sections that shouldnt even exist!!!!!!!
My prediction STA 7, LF 2
That would be LF, Alexandria, St. Cloud Apollo, Sartell, Fergus Falls, "ROCORI / River Lakes...."defense wrote:actually Little Falls did not go undefeated in the conference and the conference is not the same as the section otherwise they would've been undefeated in the conference wich they were not. Here's a question brainiak: without looking who is in the Central Lakes Conference and Section 6A?????tbvdaost wrote:hes telling you the section shouldn't exist...then you told him about how lf went undefeated in the conference....isn't the conference part of the section??? good rebuttle "mvp"ap4mvp wrote: LF is a bad team, did you fall on your head? The won the Central Lakes Conference title and went undefeated in 6A going 11-0 and now are on a 17 game winning streak.
River Lakes is not part of 6Ashins wrote:That would be LF, Alexandria, St. Cloud Apollo, Sartell, Fergus Falls, "ROCORI / River Lakes...."defense wrote:actually Little Falls did not go undefeated in the conference and the conference is not the same as the section otherwise they would've been undefeated in the conference wich they were not. Here's a question brainiak: without looking who is in the Central Lakes Conference and Section 6A?????tbvdaost wrote: hes telling you the section shouldn't exist...then you told him about how lf went undefeated in the conference....isn't the conference part of the section??? good rebuttle "mvp"
Here is a question.. which class A school in the tourney has the largest enrollment??
that is only 6 schools in the CLC, i think there are a couple more...maybe ...which answers my question, actually it doesn't because the person it was to hasn't answered yet. By the way, that was a loaded question.............shins wrote:That would be LF, Alexandria, St. Cloud Apollo, Sartell, Fergus Falls, "ROCORI / River Lakes...."defense wrote:actually Little Falls did not go undefeated in the conference and the conference is not the same as the section otherwise they would've been undefeated in the conference wich they were not. Here's a question brainiak: without looking who is in the Central Lakes Conference and Section 6A?????tbvdaost wrote: hes telling you the section shouldn't exist...then you told him about how lf went undefeated in the conference....isn't the conference part of the section??? good rebuttle "mvp"
Here is a question.. which class A school in the tourney has the largest enrollment??