Page 4 of 7

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:31 am
by MNWILD2009
HockeyGuy81 wrote:Osseo/Maple Grove had 1 player on their Peewee A team this year that played for the Osseo association last year so the merger had little, if any effect on their team. It helped more at the B1 level.
Depends which player....

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:57 am
by HockeyGuy81
He's a good player, right in the middle of the pack for their team.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:35 pm
by GoldenBear
He was the player that gave the Elk River fans the finger after Elk River scored the 6th goal of their smothering of MGrove at Regionals.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:14 pm
by HockeyGuy81
Wasn't there so I can't confirm or deny that.

Nice jab though...

Apparently Elk River should have saved some of their smothering for Sunday vs Wayzata

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:54 pm
by Cougerdude
HockeyGuy81 wrote:Wasn't there so I can't confirm or deny that.

Nice jab though...

Apparently Elk River should have saved some of their smothering for Sunday vs Wayzata
Good stuff.


After Centennial got destroyed by ER in districts, and ended the year 0-4 against them, I have a little resentment and must admit I wasn't sad to see they lost to Wayzata.


D10 still alive though - I'll go with Blaine vs. Wayzata finals and Blaine is your state champ.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:09 pm
by icedad
GoldenBear wrote:He was the player that gave the Elk River fans the finger after Elk River scored the 6th goal of their smothering of MGrove at Regionals.
Wonder what classy commentary from the parents on the other side of that glass would have motivated such a response from a 7th grade kid. Pretty embarassing. Nice to see class won out on Sunday.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:31 pm
by GoldenBear
It was ER moms so maybe they waived a pom pom or cheered. Was actually funny watching expression by moms. Mouths wide open. Kid who did it is actually a pretty good player, very physical.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:50 pm
by Sneakyfast99
GoldenBear wrote:It was ER moms so maybe they waived a pom pom or cheered. Was actually funny watching expression by moms. Mouths wide open. Kid who did it is actually a pretty good player, very physical.
One eye on the game and one eye on the ER Moms! \:D/

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:54 pm
by GoldenBear
Three eyes on the moms.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:59 pm
by Sneakyfast99
GoldenBear wrote:Three eyes on the moms.
Not sure what that means, but based on the last several posts it can't be good. #-o

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:03 pm
by GoldenBear
Back on topic. I like Roseau to play Blaine in finals. Not sure if Edina or Wayzata can get by a well rested and hot Roseau squad.

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:31 am
by MNWILD2009
GoldenBear wrote:Back on topic. I like Roseau to play Blaine in finals. Not sure if Edina or Wayzata can get by a well rested and hot Roseau squad.
Edina or Wayzata vs. Blaine in final

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:35 am
by _X_hockey4life_X_
GoldenBear wrote:It was ER moms so maybe they waived a pom pom or cheered. Was actually funny watching expression by moms. Mouths wide open. Kid who did it is actually a pretty good player, very physical.
I feel sorry for the kids not making the state tourney. They put up a very good squad. However, I am quite relieved that we won't be seeing anymore of the Elk River parents this season. Game after game, just constantly rude to the refs, obnoxious, and overly loud. Not to mention cheering like they won the super bowl after they've scored their 8th goal in a blow-out.

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:35 pm
by H mn hockey
who won the tournament? how did blaine do?

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 4:39 pm
by hkymomx5
_X_hockey4life_X_ wrote:
GoldenBear wrote:It was ER moms so maybe they waived a pom pom or cheered. Was actually funny watching expression by moms. Mouths wide open. Kid who did it is actually a pretty good player, very physical.
I feel sorry for the kids not making the state tourney. They put up a very good squad. However, I am quite relieved that we won't be seeing anymore of the Elk River parents this season. Game after game, just constantly rude to the refs, obnoxious, and overly loud. Not to mention cheering like they won the super bowl after they've scored their 8th goal in a blow-out.


Amen

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:18 pm
by Sneakyfast99
hkymomx5 wrote:
_X_hockey4life_X_ wrote:
GoldenBear wrote:It was ER moms so maybe they waived a pom pom or cheered. Was actually funny watching expression by moms. Mouths wide open. Kid who did it is actually a pretty good player, very physical.
I feel sorry for the kids not making the state tourney. They put up a very good squad. However, I am quite relieved that we won't be seeing anymore of the Elk River parents this season. Game after game, just constantly rude to the refs, obnoxious, and overly loud. Not to mention cheering like they won the super bowl after they've scored their 8th goal in a blow-out.


Amen
Really????

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:22 pm
by starmvp
H mn hockey wrote:who won the tournament? how did blaine do?
I think the tournament is next weekend.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:35 pm
by Throwback
After watching Roseau in the north tournament, I can't see them being beat. 10 to 0 over Duluth East???

3 of their 4 losses came in their 4th, 6th and 7th games of the season while playing city teams that were playing there 16th, 14th, and 13th games of the season and had been practicing while the Roseau boys were out deer hunting (yes, northern boys have many other things to do other than just play hockey). That is not the same team you'll see this weekend. They've hit full stride at just the right time.

Also, be careful of the MN Hockey Rankings. They put too much emphasis on strength of schedule. City teams are naturally going to rank high in this system since they continually play other good teams. A team can actually lose ground in the rankings by thumping a not-so-good team.

I don't think it will happen, but any team that ends up within 3 of Roseau should consider it a huge success.

...and no, I'm not a Roseau fan.

After it’s all over, and the city teams are trying to find answers I recommend that you merge more. Your method of focusing on a handful of early developers out of enormous programs in the only way us other northern small towns have been able to catch up.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:59 pm
by MNWILD2009
Throwback wrote:After watching Roseau in the north tournament, I can't see them being beat. 10 to 0 over Duluth East???

3 of their 4 losses came in their 4th, 6th and 7th games of the season while playing city teams that were playing there 16th, 14th, and 13th games of the season and had been practicing while the Roseau boys were out deer hunting (yes, northern boys have many other things to do other than just play hockey). That is not the same team you'll see this weekend. They've hit full stride at just the right time.

Also, be careful of the MN Hockey Rankings. They put too much emphasis on strength of schedule. City teams are naturally going to rank high in this system since they continually play other good teams. A team can actually lose ground in the rankings by thumping a not-so-good team.

I don't think it will happen, but any team that ends up within 3 of Roseau should consider it a huge success.

...and no, I'm not a Roseau fan.

After it’s all over, and the city teams are trying to find answers I recommend that you merge more. Your method of focusing on a handful of early developers out of enormous programs in the only way us other northern small towns have been able to catch up.

Roseau, like any other top Pee Wee A team, can be beat on any given night.

They are beatable...

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:20 pm
by Toomuchtoosoon
They may be beatable, but I find it more interesting that the Roseau kids got thumped early in the season, but have caught up and passed most at year end.

We in the cities can learn a lot from the Roseaus of the world. Instead of having tryouts in September, why not let kids finish their fall activities before hockey season begins. An alternative would be to have open hockey in September and October that one can come and go to as their other activities dictate. It will reduce the cost of the sport and give kids down here more balance in their lives.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:00 pm
by HockeySLP
Toomuchtoosoon wrote:They may be beatable, but I find it more interesting that the Roseau kids got thumped early in the season, but have caught up and passed most at year end.

We in the cities can learn a lot from the Roseaus of the world. Instead of having tryouts in September, why not let kids finish their fall activities before hockey season begins. An alternative would be to have open hockey in September and October that one can come and go to as their other activities dictate. It will reduce the cost of the sport and give kids down here more balance in their lives.
Well said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:14 pm
by Jerry
I don't think Edina will make the Finals. They did not look like a top 10 team at regions.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:26 pm
by pebbles
Toomuchtoosoon wrote:They may be beatable, but I find it more interesting that the Roseau kids got thumped early in the season, but have caught up and passed most at year end.

We in the cities can learn a lot from the Roseaus of the world. Instead of having tryouts in September, why not let kids finish their fall activities before hockey season begins. An alternative would be to have open hockey in September and October that one can come and go to as their other activities dictate. It will reduce the cost of the sport and give kids down here more balance in their lives.
=D>

Agree whole-heartedly! How many teams seemed to experience a lack of effort and more disciplinary issues as the season wore on? Hockey season is too long for some kids, even some A players.

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:43 pm
by Nobodyonya
_X_hockey4life_X_ wrote:
GoldenBear wrote:It was ER moms so maybe they waived a pom pom or cheered. Was actually funny watching expression by moms. Mouths wide open. Kid who did it is actually a pretty good player, very physical.
I feel sorry for the kids not making the state tourney. They put up a very good squad. However, I am quite relieved that we won't be seeing anymore of the Elk River parents this season. Game after game, just constantly rude to the refs, obnoxious, and overly loud. Not to mention cheering like they won the super bowl after they've scored their 8th goal in a blow-out.
100% right on! Amazing how the parents were living there life through there child. They walked around like they were unbeatable, but yet they had nothing to do with the outcome. This team had talent, but unfortunately for the opponents fans all they remember is how the parents displayed themselves. Not to get off board, but the Rogers A Bantams parents were somewhat identical and the end result wasn't so boastful anymore

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:54 am
by Vapor
pebbles wrote:
Toomuchtoosoon wrote:They may be beatable, but I find it more interesting that the Roseau kids got thumped early in the season, but have caught up and passed most at year end.

We in the cities can learn a lot from the Roseaus of the world. Instead of having tryouts in September, why not let kids finish their fall activities before hockey season begins. An alternative would be to have open hockey in September and October that one can come and go to as their other activities dictate. It will reduce the cost of the sport and give kids down here more balance in their lives.
=D>

Agree whole-heartedly! How many teams seemed to experience a lack of effort and more disciplinary issues as the season wore on? Hockey season is too long for some kids, even some A players.
Couple of good quotes! Not only is the winter season long, then you add all the AAA Summer hockey and it's crazy. I can see as the players get older the need to play more, but many of these players don't get a break. Kids need to get away from the game for awhile, even tho the parents don't want to.