Page 4 of 4

Re: CDH Coaching Scheme Exposed again

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:37 am
by Potatohead9
..

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:54 am
by Indians forever
What a great ending to a great Game. CDH sure gave it there all at the end, just came up short. Go Spuds!!!

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:43 am
by newSPUDfan
City of Compton wrote:
SPUDNUT wrote:I thought that too, but they ran a slo-mo on it later & he had 1 foot on the line when the puck crossed.
I'm curious about this play myself. I was at the game and didn't get to see a replay. Well one on the jumbo tron, but he looked way off sides to me. Will anyone 2nd this statement?
My understanding was he had possession of the puck, which would allow him to cross the blue line ahead of the puck. He took possession of it before crossing over the line. Any refs on here willing to clarify?

No biased guesses from Elk River fans, please :wink:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 9:06 am
by icedad
Not offsides
Image

removed

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 9:18 am
by originalMNSHLcoach
]removed

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:15 am
by espnmobile8
Was it just me or did it seem like almost everyone in the Ex wanted Moorhead to win?

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:57 am
by HAWKey
icedad wrote:Not offsides
Image
is that a puck or is it a drawing of a puck on paint? im glad they didn't call this offsides

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:29 am
by SPUDNUT
icedad wrote:Not offsides
Image

Is it possible to blow that up about 100% ? Elk River fans don' t see that well !

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:32 am
by northern visitor
espnmobile8 wrote:Was it just me or did it seem like almost everyone in the Ex wanted Moorhead to win?
It wasn't just you. When Cretin scored, their student section and a few parents cheered. When Moorhead scored, everyone, except the few Cretinites cheered. Way to go Spuds. Blaine will blast the Raiders today. They're not even in the same category. Alt looked terrible.

remove

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:33 am
by originalMNSHLcoach
remove]

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:34 am
by CitiesSpudsGuy
SPUDNUT wrote:
icedad wrote:Not offsides
Image

Is it possible to blow that up about 100% ? Elk River fans don' t see that well !


Maybe ER needs some glasses. Wait, I think I found some! Hey, you look much better!

Image

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:34 am
by SPUDNUT
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:Check your homer status at the door Spud.

The only part that wasn't in the offensive zone was his stick blade that drug the puck in.

Also, don't forget to bring your camera tomorrow. The Spuds will look good with the red medals around their necks.

:idea:
Can't get there, but will gladly let you borrow my camera so you can show it to the Elks (whom I notice are at home watching the whole thing on TV) !

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:52 am
by hockeyjoc251
icedad wrote:Not offsides
Image
sorry to say but that isnt even the right play you're looking at...number 21 for the raiders was not on the ice for the second goal

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:13 pm
by saintpaulhockey
northern visitor wrote:
espnmobile8 wrote:Was it just me or did it seem like almost everyone in the Ex wanted Moorhead to win?
It wasn't just you. When Cretin scored, their student section and a few parents cheered. When Moorhead scored, everyone, except the few Cretinites cheered. Way to go Spuds. Blaine will blast the Raiders today. They're not even in the same category. Alt looked terrible.
Not sure what game you were watching. Alt was, IMO, the best player on the ice. Moorhead knows how to play though, I was so impressed by this team, they played sloppy but still kept to their systems. The Spuds are among the most well-disciplined, well-coached teams I've seen in awhile. I'd love to see them slay EP.

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:26 pm
by CitiesSpudsGuy
hockeyjoc251 wrote:
icedad wrote:Not offsides
Image
sorry to say but that isnt even the right play you're looking at...number 21 for the raiders was not on the ice for the second goal
I didn't think it looked like the right play either. But I still think ER looks better with the glasses! :lol:

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:38 pm
by HockeyHigh
CitiesSpudsGuy wrote:
hockeyjoc251 wrote:
icedad wrote:Not offsides
Image
sorry to say but that isnt even the right play you're looking at...number 21 for the raiders was not on the ice for the second goal
I didn't think it looked like the right play either. But I still think ER looks better with the glasses! :lol:
It's clearly not the same play, that Moorhead player wasn't even the right one. Also, in the play, the Moorhead player was not pressured as he crossed the blue line, and caught the pass on his backhand behind his back.

Nice try though.

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:35 pm
by DemonHockey13
northern visitor wrote:
espnmobile8 wrote:Was it just me or did it seem like almost everyone in the Ex wanted Moorhead to win?
It wasn't just you. When Cretin scored, their student section and a few parents cheered. When Moorhead scored, everyone, except the few Cretinites cheered. Way to go Spuds. Blaine will blast the Raiders today. They're not even in the same category. Alt looked terrible.
Well everyone hates cretin for no reason so its not a surpise that everyone woulod cheer against them...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:57 pm
by newSPUDfan
DemonHockey13 wrote:
northern visitor wrote:
espnmobile8 wrote:Was it just me or did it seem like almost everyone in the Ex wanted Moorhead to win?
It wasn't just you. When Cretin scored, their student section and a few parents cheered. When Moorhead scored, everyone, except the few Cretinites cheered. Way to go Spuds. Blaine will blast the Raiders today. They're not even in the same category. Alt looked terrible.
Well everyone hates cretin for no reason so its not a surpise that everyone woulod cheer against them...
I think Cretin being a private school that recruits is a reason. A dang good one, too.

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:07 pm
by espnmobile8
newSPUDfan wrote:
DemonHockey13 wrote:
northern visitor wrote:It wasn't just you. When Cretin scored, their student section and a few parents cheered. When Moorhead scored, everyone, except the few Cretinites cheered. Way to go Spuds. Blaine will blast the Raiders today. They're not even in the same category. Alt looked terrible.
Well everyone hates cretin for no reason so its not a surpise that everyone woulod cheer against them...
I think Cretin being a private school that recruits is a reason. A dang good one, too.
Yeah, I agree. I would have left Minnesota if Cretin won it this year.

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:10 pm
by Hoops
HockeyHigh wrote:
CitiesSpudsGuy wrote:
hockeyjoc251 wrote: sorry to say but that isnt even the right play you're looking at...number 21 for the raiders was not on the ice for the second goal
I didn't think it looked like the right play either. But I still think ER looks better with the glasses! :lol:
It's clearly not the same play, that Moorhead player wasn't even the right one. Also, in the play, the Moorhead player was not pressured as he crossed the blue line, and caught the pass on his backhand behind his back.

Nice try though.
This was called offsides..it was the play Lou was yelling at him for not passing...they show the replay and he was definitely onsides and they said nothing. It looked like an easy call live and easier w/ replay.

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:12 pm
by Hoops
DemonHockey13 wrote:
northern visitor wrote:
espnmobile8 wrote:Was it just me or did it seem like almost everyone in the Ex wanted Moorhead to win?
It wasn't just you. When Cretin scored, their student section and a few parents cheered. When Moorhead scored, everyone, except the few Cretinites cheered. Way to go Spuds. Blaine will blast the Raiders today. They're not even in the same category. Alt looked terrible.
Well everyone hates cretin for no reason so its not a surpise that everyone woulod cheer against them...
I believe they wanted Cretin to lose because they didn't deserve to beat DE and they didn't look much better against Moorhead. An EP/Cretin final would have been a disaster for any hockey fan..THAT's why they were rooting for Moorhead.