Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:17 pm
f.h-he wasnt just a good player...great player, he doesnt do that bad a job announcing you guys are overreacting a bit...no worse than gorg...name a thread after him.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
That's for sure that Woog is a lot more annoying. I would rather listen to Housley any day.mj79 wrote:well yea, but thats obvious, especially now his grandson is on the team... But Nanne is actually a good commentator unlike woog, who is actually more annoying than housleygfhockey wrote:nanne to edina is frank and doog to gophers
Agreed.stilly5hm3 wrote:f.h-he wasnt just a good player...great player, he doesnt do that bad a job announcing you guys are overreacting a bit...no worse than gorg...name a thread after him.
As long as my contract is finding out where the cheapest gas is, put my name down.wbmd wrote:Then apply for the job so that everyone can cut you down next year.Goldy Gopher wrote:I take that bet. There is 0 doubt in my mind that I could do a better job.wbmd wrote:![]()
![]()
To all of your complaints that will be posted about Phil Housley and any other media specialist throughout the State Tournament.
I'd bet that the majority of you guys and gals couldn't do any better.
If I grow a pair will Housley be better because if that is what it takes I will do itStayAtHomeD wrote:Wow, so much hatred for Housley. You guys sound like a bunch of disrespected little girls.
Grow a pair.
Lets keep guys in there that have close ties to MN HS, youth, college, and pro hockey. Not some guy who hasn't been around our hs hockey and is pro-canadian, major jr hockey. That's my vote anyway.Someone tell Channel 45 to pay the money to get Don Cherry next year. Love him or hate him Don Cherry keeps you listening.
I thought he was just fine in the entire tournament. Just as good as Clay Matvik and Lou Nanne.MNHockeyFan wrote:I thought Housley did a pretty good job in the final. Just my opinion -
so did you watch? as said above he doesn't have a day job so what does he really care about what all or us thnk? by the way he has a 12th grade education and themn went pro on to his way to not needing a day job.firehousley wrote:The job Housley has done on the air is absolutely pitiful, and has never improved. If you are getting paid to do this, at least put a little studying in before you get on the air -- it's not like you have a day job! Just because you were a good player doesn't mean you will be a good announcer or a good coach. All this proves is that the station has no standards for quality; rather, they just want a 'famous' name and they hope no one will notice the eighth grade vocabulary and syntax being used. It's an insult to our intelligence for them to assume the viewers are satisfied with this guy after all the years he's been on--if they cared what the viewers think they'd get a decent replacement. Of course they will never boot him; hopefully he wises up and sees he's doing more bad than good to his reputation doing this job.
wingmaster wrote:so did you watch? as said above he doesn't have a day job so what does he really care about what all or us thnk? by the way he has a 12th grade education and themn went pro on to his way to not needing a day job.firehousley wrote:The job Housley has done on the air is absolutely pitiful, and has never improved. If you are getting paid to do this, at least put a little studying in before you get on the air -- it's not like you have a day job! Just because you were a good player doesn't mean you will be a good announcer or a good coach. All this proves is that the station has no standards for quality; rather, they just want a 'famous' name and they hope no one will notice the eighth grade vocabulary and syntax being used. It's an insult to our intelligence for them to assume the viewers are satisfied with this guy after all the years he's been on--if they cared what the viewers think they'd get a decent replacement. Of course they will never boot him; hopefully he wises up and sees he's doing more bad than good to his reputation doing this job.
wbmd wrote:I thought he was just fine in the entire tournament. Just as good as Clay Matvik and Lou Nanne.MNHockeyFan wrote:I thought Housley did a pretty good job in the final. Just my opinion -
wbmd + Housley = ♥wbmd wrote:Agreed.stilly5hm3 wrote:f.h-he wasnt just a good player...great player, he doesnt do that bad a job announcing you guys are overreacting a bit...no worse than gorg...name a thread after him.
Kevin Gorg is terrible. Again, I would rather listen to Housley over Doug Woog or Kevin Gorg any day.