The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
While upsets in sections are always possible, you have to consider North to be the clear favorite to emerge out of 1AA.Sparlimb wrote:Let's be honest. This LVN team looks RIPE for the picking in sections. I'll be a little surprised if they make it downtown again.
Lol. Funny.Sparlimb wrote:Let's be honest. This LVN team looks RIPE for the picking in sections. I'll be a little surprised if they make it downtown again.
lolSparlimb wrote:Let's be honest. This LVN team looks RIPE for the picking in sections. I'll be a little surprised if they make it downtown again.
Should be interesting. Def thought Farmington would beat Burnsville. Hats off to the Blaze for going into Farmington and handing it to them.nahc wrote:Just saw where Burnsville ripped Farmington 6-1 last night..... wonder which Farmington team will show up tomorrow?
Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.Sats81 wrote:6-2 final over shakopee. Shots were 71-12. Not a typo.
They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.Blackhawkfan wrote:Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.Sats81 wrote:6-2 final over shakopee. Shots were 71-12. Not a typo.
No they actually were 63 -12 on the scoreboard....the rest of what you said may be accurate, but your lack of maturity sure shows through.Sats81 wrote:They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.Blackhawkfan wrote:Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.Sats81 wrote:6-2 final over shakopee. Shots were 71-12. Not a typo.
No padding black sqwuak
LOL! I really love this board.Blackhawkfan wrote:No they actually were 63 -12 on the scoreboard....the rest of what you said may be accurate, but your lack of maturity sure shows through.Sats81 wrote:They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.Blackhawkfan wrote: Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.
No padding black sqwuak
If lack of maturity is what you wanna call it, lets go with it black sqwauk! I would rather have a lack of maturity then a lack of vision though, because scoreboard said 67-12 shots. Final answer. Its irrelevant though. Smile big guy.Blackhawkfan wrote:No they actually were 63 -12 on the scoreboard....the rest of what you said may be accurate, but your lack of maturity sure shows through.Sats81 wrote:They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.Blackhawkfan wrote: Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.
No padding black sqwuak
Sats81 wrote:They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.Blackhawkfan wrote:Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.Sats81 wrote:6-2 final over shakopee. Shots were 71-12. Not a typo.
I bet Tim P. is the designated guy. JK Sats. Hard to believe two people would argue this. Funny though.
Bluelightspecial wrote:Bluelights, he may just be!Sats81 wrote:They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.Blackhawkfan wrote: Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.
I bet Tim P. is the designated guy. JK Sats. Hard to believe two people would argue this. Funny though.
I thought the signed score sheet by the ref's at the end of the game makes the game (score, shots, penalties, etc.) offical?Sats81 wrote:They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.Blackhawkfan wrote:Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.Sats81 wrote:6-2 final over shakopee. Shots were 71-12. Not a typo.
No padding black sqwuak
I've been to every game the last 2 years, Thanks for confirming what every parent and player already knew. Hockey hub stats are being changed and do not reflect the official score sheet signed or what was called on the ice by the referee. Changes are made 1-3 days after the game some times longer. Assists are removed, assists are added, shots always added. Its ironic the same 3-4 kids seem to be the benefactors of those added assists the referees missed??.Sats81 wrote:They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.Blackhawkfan wrote:Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.Sats81 wrote:6-2 final over shakopee. Shots were 71-12. Not a typo.
No padding black sqwuak
Man. I knew the Poehlings stats were BS! All those mystery assists!buttend wrote:I've been to every game the last 2 years, Thanks for confirming what every parent and player already knew. Hockey hub stats are being changed and do not reflect the official score sheet signed or what was called on the ice by the referee. Changes are made 1-3 days after the game some times longer. Assists are removed, assists are added, shots always added. Its ironic the same 3-4 kids seem to be the benefactors of those added assists the referees missed??.Sats81 wrote:They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.Blackhawkfan wrote: Shots were 63-12 on the scoreboard.......still a heck of a lot of shots and the Shakopee goalie played well into the 3rd period but someone padded them by 8.
No padding black sqwuak
In the Juniors, College, NHL there is a process for changing stats, but and its controlled by the league, your not the league! Should we be calling you "Stats81" instead of Sats81?
Stats, I think you need to go back and edit the Shakopee game again. Shots are now up to 85. At this pace we will hit 100 shots by Tuesday and 18 assists on 6 goals.Sats81 wrote:Man. I knew the Poehlings stats were BS! All those mystery assists!buttend wrote:I've been to every game the last 2 years, Thanks for confirming what every parent and player already knew. Hockey hub stats are being changed and do not reflect the official score sheet signed or what was called on the ice by the referee. Changes are made 1-3 days after the game some times longer. Assists are removed, assists are added, shots always added. Its ironic the same 3-4 kids seem to be the benefactors of those added assists the referees missed??.Sats81 wrote: They were actually 67-12 on the scoreboard, but all game films are reviewed and SOG, +/-, goals, assists, etc are finalized by designated person from LN to make sure no mistakes were made, as we all know the clowns in the box are too busy eating hot dogs and refreshments from concession stand vs actually paying attention the game.
No padding black sqwuak
In the Juniors, College, NHL there is a process for changing stats, but and its controlled by the league, your not the league! Should we be calling you "Stats81" instead of Sats81?
If your kid is good enough colleges will notice him Pal. You are worried about the wrong stuff clearly. I'm sure your son is a great team player though!
:) Anyway, stats are just that...... numbers....... they don't tell how much of a team player a skater is nor does it tell me if he/she backchecks, goes into the corners for the puck, etc..... :)You got it man, i'll get right on that! What number is your son so I can make sure to take a few points away from nick and jack and give him a few more so scouts come watch him?buttend wrote:Stats, I think you need to go back and edit the Shakopee game again. Shots are now up to 85. At this pace we will hit 100 shots by Tuesday and 18 assists on 6 goals.Sats81 wrote:Man. I knew the Poehlings stats were BS! All those mystery assists!buttend wrote: I've been to every game the last 2 years, Thanks for confirming what every parent and player already knew. Hockey hub stats are being changed and do not reflect the official score sheet signed or what was called on the ice by the referee. Changes are made 1-3 days after the game some times longer. Assists are removed, assists are added, shots always added. Its ironic the same 3-4 kids seem to be the benefactors of those added assists the referees missed??.
In the Juniors, College, NHL there is a process for changing stats, but and its controlled by the league, your not the league! Should we be calling you "Stats81" instead of Sats81?
If your kid is good enough colleges will notice him Pal. You are worried about the wrong stuff clearly. I'm sure your son is a great team player though!