The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Fun game to watch at the MAC tonight before the table was tilted.... A LOT!Stang5280 wrote:They certainly both came crashing back to earth after last week’s performances. Class A is just all around messy this year.GoldyGopher wrote:Thursday 3A top team results:
New Prague: 4 Hutch: 1
Orono: 7 LDC: 1
How'd they look?fastncrash wrote:Fun game to watch at the MAC tonight before the table was tilted.... A LOT!Stang5280 wrote:They certainly both came crashing back to earth after last week’s performances. Class A is just all around messy this year.GoldyGopher wrote:Thursday 3A top team results:
New Prague: 4 Hutch: 1
Orono: 7 LDC: 1
Players looked fine. The Officials set the legitimacy of MN High School Hockey back 30 years. But they secured the Win.GoldyGopher wrote:How'd they look?fastncrash wrote:Fun game to watch at the MAC tonight before the table was tilted.... A LOT!Stang5280 wrote: They certainly both came crashing back to earth after last week’s performances. Class A is just all around messy this year.
poor job of refereeing tonight. 2 loose pucks that Luverne goalie didn't have in first period and ref blows the whistle.. probably wouldn't have led to goals but you never know. However, loose puck in 3rd with 6 or so minutes left and comes right to an LDC player with an open net and ref blows whistle again. Should have been a tie game. Luverne escapes this one.better late wrote:4-2 Luverne, empty netter at 16:59.
Its funny you should say that. I feel like, and I could be wrong, both teams feel the refs were bad, equally.hawkeyguy2 wrote:poor job of refereeing tonight. 2 loose pucks that Luverne goalie didn't have in first period and ref blows the whistle.. probably wouldn't have led to goals but you never know. However, loose puck in 3rd with 6 or so minutes left and comes right to an LDC player with an open net and ref blows whistle again. Should have been a tie game. Luverne escapes this one.better late wrote:4-2 Luverne, empty netter at 16:59.
Having seen both the Hutch games in Rochester this weekend, they started #33 in net against Mayo and from people around me, it sounded like it was his first career start. They played #1 Saturday against Lourdes who is their usual starter looking at minutes on hockey hub.goldy313 wrote:I caught the last 2 periods of Luverne vs Cathedral and agree the officiating wasn't very good. But that happens and you can't be that bad on the penalty kill. And you still blew a 3 goal lead.....I left thinking there isn't a class A team Luverne can't beat but they can lose to a bunch of them as well.
Hutch losing bad to Mayo threw me, then they come back and beat Lourdes handily....Honestly I don't know what to make of Wright County Conference teams. The results are hard to figure.....New Prague ties Hermantown, Cretin beats Holy Family by 9.
hawkeyguy2 wrote:poor job of refereeing tonight. 2 loose pucks that Luverne goalie didn't have in first period and ref blows the whistle.. probably wouldn't have led to goals but you never know. However, loose puck in 3rd with 6 or so minutes left and comes right to an LDC player with an open net and ref blows whistle again. Should have been a tie game. Luverne escapes thisbetter late wrote:4-2 Luverne, empty netter at 16:59.
The only thing Luverne escaped was the DOUCHEBAG LDC JV team! What a bunch of disrespectful punks, absolutely classless group of young adults. I hope the parents of those thugs are proud!!
Yuge wrote:I saw a team get out to an early lead in TWO games by playing the way they are able to, and then let the foot off the gas, again, and left the door open. LDC has some players and seemed to be Coached well. Not sure on the D-baggery, but I almost respect a player/team that doesn't like being pushed around. From the drop... both sides had their hands too high on contact, JMO. At least the puck movement for LHS seems to be coming around. And LDC is very capable of moving the puck well. If you missed the first period in St. Cloud, you basically missed the game. But now that Template for attack is known at least.hawkeyguy2 wrote:poor job of refereeing tonight. 2 loose pucks that Luverne goalie didn't have in first period and ref blows the whistle.. probably wouldn't have led to goals but you never know. However, loose puck in 3rd with 6 or so minutes left and comes right to an LDC player with an open net and ref blows whistle again. Should have been a tie game. Luverne escapes thisbetter late wrote:4-2 Luverne, empty netter at 16:59.
The only thing Luverne escaped was the DOUCHEBAG LDC JV team! What a bunch of disrespectful punks, absolutely classless group of young adults. I hope the parents of those thugs are proud!!
Officiating is what it is... but a Check that doesn't even get a second look in AA is eventually "negotiated" into a 5 Min Major as the kid lays on the ice to seal the deal... (Thought maybe he was used up by it, but most likely just embarrassed on getting tagged with his head down). For a few seconds I thought maybe he was hurt?, but after the 5 was posted, he made an absolutely stunning and miraculous recovery AND ALSO the next shift and scored his goal... so egg on A LOT of faces at that point. Kudos to the kid knowing how to "Play the Softer/Gentler Class A game". And, regarding the officials at LDC, IF an Official is consistently caught on the OPPOSITE Blue Line trying to make below the Goalline calls because he is unable to move quick enough to keep up with the play, IT SHOULD raise a LOT of questions on why he is even there. Low Ref had his hands full just trying to stay out of the way. Not even going to comment on the Goal that did go in, but was not even seen. Bottom line in the St. Cloud game is that there is NO way the game was called the way it was from the second period on out, IF the score was reversed. And THAT is very SAD.
fastncrash wrote:Yuge wrote:I saw a team get out to an early lead in TWO games by playing the way they are able to, and then let the foot off the gas, again, and left the door open. LDC has some players and seemed to be Coached well. Not sure on the D-baggery, but I almost respect a player/team that doesn't like being pushed around. From the drop... both sides had their hands too high on contact, JMO. At least the puck movement for LHS seems to be coming around. And LDC is very capable of moving the puck well. If you missed the first period in St. Cloud, you basically missed the game. But now that Template for attack is known at least.hawkeyguy2 wrote: poor job of refereeing tonight. 2 loose pucks that Luverne goalie didn't have in first period and ref blows the whistle.. probably wouldn't have led to goals but you never know. However, loose puck in 3rd with 6 or so minutes left and comes right to an LDC player with an open net and ref blows whistle again. Should have been a tie game. Luverne escapes this
The only thing Luverne escaped was the DOUCHEBAG LDC JV team! What a bunch of disrespectful punks, absolutely classless group of young adults. I hope the parents of those thugs are proud!!
Officiating is what it is... but a Check that doesn't even get a second look in AA is eventually "negotiated" into a 5 Min Major as the kid lays on the ice to seal the deal... (Thought maybe he was used up by it, but most likely just embarrassed on getting tagged with his head down). For a few seconds I thought maybe he was hurt?, but after the 5 was posted, he made an absolutely stunning and miraculous recovery AND ALSO the next shift and scored his goal... so egg on A LOT of faces at that point. Kudos to the kid knowing how to "Play the Softer/Gentler Class A game". And, regarding the officials at LDC, IF an Official is consistently caught on the OPPOSITE Blue Line trying to make below the Goalline calls because he is unable to move quick enough to keep up with the play, IT SHOULD raise a LOT of questions on why he is even there. Low Ref had his hands full just trying to stay out of the way. Not even going to comment on the Goal that did go in, but was not even seen. Bottom line in the St. Cloud game is that there is NO way the game was called the way it was from the second period on out, IF the score was reversed. And THAT is very SAD.
[/quote
I should have clarified in my earlier rant that the behavior I was told about was taking place in the stands. Nothing to do with play on the ice
Yuge wrote:fastncrash wrote:So........you're ranting about something you were told about but didn't see firsthand? doh-kayYuge wrote: I saw a team get out to an early lead in TWO games by playing the way they are able to, and then let the foot off the gas, again, and left the door open. LDC has some players and seemed to be Coached well. Not sure on the D-baggery, but I almost respect a player/team that doesn't like being pushed around. From the drop... both sides had their hands too high on contact, JMO. At least the puck movement for LHS seems to be coming around. And LDC is very capable of moving the puck well. If you missed the first period in St. Cloud, you basically missed the game. But now that Template for attack is known at least.
Officiating is what it is... but a Check that doesn't even get a second look in AA is eventually "negotiated" into a 5 Min Major as the kid lays on the ice to seal the deal... (Thought maybe he was used up by it, but most likely just embarrassed on getting tagged with his head down). For a few seconds I thought maybe he was hurt?, but after the 5 was posted, he made an absolutely stunning and miraculous recovery AND ALSO the next shift and scored his goal... so egg on A LOT of faces at that point. Kudos to the kid knowing how to "Play the Softer/Gentler Class A game". And, regarding the officials at LDC, IF an Official is consistently caught on the OPPOSITE Blue Line trying to make below the Goalline calls because he is unable to move quick enough to keep up with the play, IT SHOULD raise a LOT of questions on why he is even there. Low Ref had his hands full just trying to stay out of the way. Not even going to comment on the Goal that did go in, but was not even seen. Bottom line in the St. Cloud game is that there is NO way the game was called the way it was from the second period on out, IF the score was reversed. And THAT is very SAD.
[/quote
I should have clarified in my earlier rant that the behavior I was told about was taking place in the stands. Nothing to do with play on the ice
Corn Cobb wrote:Yuge wrote:Are you with the ranting police?? I did not realize I was not following ranting protocol, this is a forum is it not? Anyways, I was there and did see the behavior firsthand as well as being told of it by others. Am I clear to rant now??fastncrash wrote: So........you're ranting about something you were told about but didn't see firsthand? doh-kay
Yuge wrote:Corn Cobb wrote:You Luverne 'fans' are something else....Yuge wrote: Are you with the ranting police?? I did not realize I was not following ranting protocol, this is a forum is it not? Anyways, I was there and did see the behavior firsthand as well as being told of it by others. Am I clear to rant now??
Corn Cobb wrote:Yuge wrote:please don't lump everyone into one group.Corn Cobb wrote: You Luverne 'fans' are something else....
I would say without a question LDC is better than Monticello. A quick glance and you can see Monticello lost over 150 points to graduation or juniors. They should still find a way back to the X but this isn't a team that has scoring to upset top teams like last year.Yuge wrote:Litch at Marshall tomorrow night, winner likely locks up the two seed. Litch and Luverne played a competitive game last Saturday with Luverne hanging on for the win. Litch beat Monti Tuesday night which was considered a upset. Seeing Monti and LDC both play this year LDC is the better team IMO. Marshall has been beating up on weaker teams of late so this will be a good test for them, I would be surprised if this is not a close game
LDC 3 Marshall 2
Agree with 1-5 but Willmar over Redwood when Willmar has won one game and Redwood beat them? Not that it really matters, but just wondering.Thegoldenjet wrote:1. Luverne - not the 'hype' Luverne of years past but a product of it, hate to lose. Its not even really about winning, just don't lose.
2. LDC - they play a brand of hockey that we all aspire to. It does not discriminate, its hard and fast. Geographical association and schedule cannot be denied, the 3A tourney is a step down for them.
3. Marshall - young talent middling between cocky against lessers and capable against equals and betters. Wins are nice but not losing at GAC defines.
4. Hutch - plays hard, not enough skill to make effort count. Same geographical advantage as LDC, been beat up, looking to have some fun again, sleep on at your own risk.
5. New Ulm - Not the New Ulm I've grown to dislike, the effort isn't even there, feel sorry more than I feel mad. But, there is hockey there, where is Sticks?
6. Willmar - hard to progress when the gateway to Central Minnesota loses respect every year.
7. RWV - sad story, banner year for them, and the fall off has been bad. I was looking forward to Redwood being legitimate competition because geographically we need it.
8. Windom - could make someone sweat and frustrated.
9 the rest
The way that RWV has been playing lately, you actually may be correct. That loss to Fairmont was not pretty. A loss to Worthington Thursday, while unlikely, would seal the deal, sadly.Thegoldenjet wrote:You're right. I blanked on that and just went with inherent bias I guess. Wasn't to spite, flip them, or not, as you alluded probably doesn't matter, both about equally capable of giving a low seed home team fits and throwing a wrench.
Losing Sommers and then a coaching change with Stremcha coming to New Ulm can probably be attributed to a lot of the problems RWV has had. A simple glance leads me to believe that their conditioning is a big problem too. They are a -37 for 3rd period scoring. They were +6 in the third last year. The opponent PP percentage is up nearly 20% too. Obviously losing Sommers attributes to these numbers as well, unclear how much though.goldy313 wrote:The Wright County Conference is better than a whole lot of other conferences, LDC and Hutch benefit from playing there over where Luverne plays. Luverne does a good job of trying to play a tougher schedule but geography holds them quite a bit.
Redwood Valley has a top player in the state no one knows about in Luke Ryan, I know their depth is lacking but I expected more from them.
I still think Luverne is the team to beat but any of the group of Marshall, LDC, and Hutch could win.......I probably shouldn't discount New Ulm either.