Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:11 am
by ya-man
My prediction was Cloquet 4-1. I was disappointed that it took to the 3rd period before Cloquet showed their game. I thought Tyler Johnson would be much more of a force too. But Edina was really up for this game. The Hornets have a nice combination of speed and size.
It was funny to see the Edina parent attitude drift down to their boys on the ice.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:22 am
by ChrisK
I got it right too, Zamman summed things up pretty well. Tyler Johnson was a non-factor until the 3rd period and Ellingson kept the Jacks in the game. There were two called off goals for Edina, both I thought were the right call because I heard the whistle before the puck went in each time. For the first two periods Edina just looked quicker and slicker than the 'Jacks but Cloquet came on pretty strong in the 3rd.
Both teams got shorthanded goals in the 2nd, the penalty calls against the respective teams seemed to fire up them up so the shorthanded team turned it up a notch. Overall, a really fun game to watch, very intense.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:57 am
by hockeyfan3
You're right about the two goals that were disallowed. The first one (at the end of the first period) was questionable on whether it even went in because the net came off at the same time and everything but the 2nd one (end of the 2nd) was forsure a goal but the ref blew the whistle because he lost the puck. Ellingson never had the puck and it should've been a goal but it happens.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:34 pm
by gopherhockey33
correct me if I'm wrong but isnt today edinas 3 game in 3 days! thats got to be a little bit of a factor.
i still edina beats minnetonka. my prediction is 4-2
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:23 pm
by DFORCE10
Who scored for each team?
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:32 pm
by scoreboard33
reber
everson
budish
for edina
i don't think there will be a let down, there was so much emotion last night that i think it might carry over,
+ minnetonka's rated about 12 so they are pretty good and i hope edina's not underrating them.
giles might be able to help the emotion carry over because of his NHL background
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:38 pm
by quickgym guy
Not to make excuses, but CEC was without 3 of their forwards due to injury...
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:40 pm
by boblee
quickgym guy wrote:Not to make excuses, but CEC was without 3 of their forwards due to injury...
Uh, which three?
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:42 pm
by quickgym guy
boblee wrote:quickgym guy wrote:Not to make excuses, but CEC was without 3 of their forwards due to injury...
Uh, which three?
Karlsson (1st line)
Ermatinger (3rd line)
Dunaisky (3rd line)
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:43 pm
by boblee
That does hurt.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:48 pm
by quickgym guy
[quote="boblee"]That does hurt.
Really hurt their chemistry switching lines around & having to pull up JV players for a game like this. JV guy's did a great job stepping up... Edina can fly though. And their PP is the best I've seen.
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:26 am
by Lumberjack
Cloquet shouldn't hang their heads too low after this loss. When you consider they were without one of their top line forwards and were (in my opinion) completely out played for two periods, a one goal loss to a top 3 team isn't all that bad. Much of the credit has to go to Reid Ellingson for keeping the game as close as it was. It would be interesting to see a healthy Cloquet vs Edina in a re-match.