Page 1 of 2
Instant Replay
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:44 pm
by Lumberjack
I've been watching the evening session and have noticed atleast 3 goals waived off for various reasons. I was hoping to get some feedback on what people think of goal review in high school hockey.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:16 pm
by The Best 4th Liner
Terrible, no need those man in the crease calls needed to be changed.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:21 pm
by Neutron 14
The rules are the same for everyone, and I'd much rather have it black and white than have the Ref's use their "judgement". I think its working, and well at that.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:13 pm
by mohunk
1996 would have had a different champion with the camera as the refs/goal judge missed Duluth East's goal vs Apple Valley in ?which? overtime in the semifinal game. Kept Spehar et al. out of the finals. I like the review.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:24 pm
by gino2516
The calls i thought were pretty good. on the first goal waved off in the GR game the player clearly interfered with the goalie, the other one was iffy
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:29 pm
by KnightTime11
as a Moorhead alum, class of 2005.... I say get the call right.
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:13 am
by goldy313
They used it to wave off 4 goals tonight but didn't use it to give Faupel his when clearly the ref screwed that one up. If you're going to use it, use it both ways.
Also a skate n the crease not anywhere near the goalie or the play should not warrant a man in the crease call, especially when there's replay to determine if it affected the play. The NHL changed their rule, high schools should too.
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:15 am
by gopherhockey33
to bad buddy you guys lost get over it!!!
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:26 am
by hast-h-fan
goldy313 wrote:They used it to wave off 4 goals tonight but didn't use it to give Faupel his when clearly the ref screwed that one up. If you're going to use it, use it both ways.
Also a skate n the crease not anywhere near the goalie or the play should not warrant a man in the crease call, especially when there's replay to determine if it affected the play. The NHL changed their rule, high schools should too.
Yes I was surprised they didn't give him that goal. No doubt he kicked it but there was not enough clear evidence that he didn't touch it with his stick. Too bad though.... refs blew it! AGAIN
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:08 am
by carpenterguy
As far as I remember the 96 game wouldn't have been overturned. You need solid evidence and I don't think the replay showed that. I could be wrong, but it's water under the bridge now.
7,185th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:52 am
by slapshooter
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:22 pm
by BIAFP
The 1996 five overtime game would not have even had a review as there has to be a goal signaled to review and it never happened.
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:25 pm
by minnesotahockey1
They have already made so many good calls due to the Instant Replay it'd almost be insane not to have it. Without it GR wouldve burried Burnsville in the first period just by bad calls.
Also, in the Warroad game the outcome would have been much different if Marvin's goal in the first wasnt called off (which was a good call to call it off) because it woulve been 3-0 not just 2-0 after the first. Big difference.
Re: 7,185th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:28 pm
by BIAFP
If they had it available in 2005 then Moorhead would have lost by one instead of two
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:18 pm
by mikemodano09
maybe the coaches should get 1 challenge per game... huh huh?? and if they lose the challenge there goes their timeout... might spice it up a little
Re: 7,185th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:24 pm
by KnightTime11
BIAFP wrote:
If they had it available in 2005 then Moorhead would have lost by one instead of two
You don't know that. Bariball would have had to work a little harder if the net wasn't empty.
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:10 pm
by formerallstar
For the state tournament there should definitely be instant replay........
however i think the man in the crease rule should be changed to the NHL rules where it is only waved off if he is interfering with the goalie
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:27 pm
by BIGSEXY
formerallstar wrote:For the state tournament there should definitely be instant replay........
however i think the man in the crease rule should be changed to the NHL rules where it is only waved off if he is interfering with the goalie
Thank you!!!
7,202nd post by SS since Feb 27th 2002
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:06 pm
by slapshooter
KnightTime11 wrote:
You don't know that. Bariball would have had to work a little harder if the net wasn't empty.
BIAFP doesn't know anything but he posts on here anyway!
S
S
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:59 pm
by AngusYoung
slapshooter = pot
BIAFP = kettle
pot calling kettle black in the above post.
post 7225
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:03 pm
by boblee
I say get rid of it.
Re: post 7225
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 6:07 am
by BIAFP
boblee wrote:I say get rid of Slapshooter
.
Re: 7,185th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:02 am
by Zamman
BIAFP wrote:
If they had it available in 2005 then Moorhead would have lost by one instead of two
But the fact is they would have still lost.....
And then the mysterious no goal call of 2004 would have the changed the outcome of the first quarterfinal....But this is why they have added the instant replay.
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:33 am
by BIAFP
All games in the show go down in the record books as a W or L
That's why they added IP in the first place!
