Page 1 of 1
Why does the CCHA and Hockey East have more teams than WCHA
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:44 pm
by mnhshockey00
Does anyone else think it is not right that the WCHA has less teams representing it?
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:50 pm
by cake-eater
The premier conference in college hockey has only 3 teams while other conferences have more?
Yes, it is quite a joke. WCHA has historically and recently won the most championships.
The WCHA was robbed. And then they put North Dakota and Minnesota in the same bracket!??
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:07 pm
by mnhshockey00
I think the national championship is the winner of the Minnesota and North Dakota if the play eachother in there 2nd game
post 7409
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:52 pm
by boblee
mnhshockey00 wrote:I think the national championship is the winner of the Minnesota and North Dakota if the play eachother in there 2nd game
Not so fast my friend. Don't kid yourself. Clarkson, Notre Dame, New Hampshire, Boston, Michigan, all teams that can play some puck.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:51 pm
by casualfan
Boy's don't count out SCSU you will see a different team on FSN tomorrow at 5:00pm
Re: post 7409
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:44 pm
by puckoff077
boblee wrote:mnhshockey00 wrote:I think the national championship is the winner of the Minnesota and North Dakota if the play eachother in there 2nd game
Not so fast my friend. Don't kid yourself. Clarkson, Notre Dame, New Hampshire, Boston, Michigan, all teams that can play some puck.
i agree that it will be a wcha team, but BC is looking really hot right now and ND has really solid goalie. it'll be interesting to see how lamareoux comes back after that OT goal in the championship. those type of goals tend to linger on goalie's minds.
Re: Why does the CCHA and Hockey East have more teams than W
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:46 pm
by State Champ 97
mnhshockey00 wrote:Does anyone else think it is not right that the WCHA has less teams representing it?
While the other conferences have some good teams I still smell conspiracy
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:33 pm
by wisconsinprephockey
Yes, the WCHA did get the shaft this year, and I'll tell you why.
No one (other than fans of the WCHA, and WCHA teams) want the title to come back to the WCHA.
This is the same reason most sports have salary caps. So one team (in this case conference) doesn't win everything. Unfortunately for the WCHA, the way the selection committee went about it is simply unethical, immoral, and cheap.
Everyone knows without a doubt the WCHA is the best conference in college hockey, they are just simply trying to knock the WCHA off their high horse.
Good Luck UM, UND, SCSU. Bring it home for us!!
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:44 pm
by mnhshockey00
I would love for it to be a gopher/sioux vs. St.Cloud title game!
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:40 pm
by RSI
mnhshockey00 wrote:I think the national championship is the winner of the Minnesota and North Dakota if the play eachother in there 2nd game
AGREED.
There are 3 WCHA teams (Wisconsin, Denver and CC) not playing this weekend that are probably better than Maine, Miami, Michigan State and maybe even UNH and Clarkson too.
You heard it here first, two #1's gone in the first weekend.
UMass over Clarkson in round 1
BC over UNH in round 2
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:57 pm
by Stealth
mnhshockey00 wrote:I would love for it to be a gopher/sioux vs. St.Cloud title game!
NCAA didn’t want Three WCHA teams in the Frozen Four. What a joke having two in one bracket!
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:35 pm
by mnwild18
You heard it here first, two #1's gone in the first weekend.
UMass over Clarkson in round 1
BC over UNH in round 2[/quote]
Nice Call, and I would be willing to bet that BC takes out NH the way they are playing right now.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:56 pm
by cake-eater
