Page 1 of 3
SEC Conference
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:25 pm
by Gotothenetman
I am looking for some thoughts on the SEC for this upcoming winter. I do not know much about the teams other than I assume Cretin is possibly the favorite. Who else is in the conference and what is the scouting report on those teams.
Looking for someone in the know!
Re: SEC Conference
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:37 pm
by Can't Never Tried
Gotothenetman wrote:I do not know much about the teams other than I assume Cretin is possibly the favorite. Looking for someone in the know!
Gee, packerboy what do you think?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:44 pm
by SEC Scotty
I would break it down like this.
Favorites-CDH and Woodbury
Will challenge- Roseville, WBL, Stillwater
Could surprise- Hastings
The rest. Mounds View. Forest Lake, Park (Cottage Grove)
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:51 pm
by packerboy
Hmmm, let me think.
Seriously though, the conference should be "Up for Grabs"
CDH graduated a lot of good players. So did the other strong teams such as WBL, Roseville, and Woodbury.
The conference had some great HS players last year(Hickey, McDonaugh, Jake Hansen, Dorr (just to name a few) that are gone to JRs or graduation. I doubt there was a conference any where that had more talent.
It will be fun to see who takes their place.
SEC
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 3:37 pm
by hockey nut
Roseville, WBL, CDH will have a shot at it. Hastings will be awful again, Cottage Grove may improve with Jay Moser there. Stillwater would be my surprise.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 4:06 pm
by hockeyeast223
I would agree that the conference is up for grabs. I would say Cretin and and White Bear always seem to put together good teams but this year, they don't quite have the same level of talent. Roseville, Stillwater, Woodbury all have a chance to be top contenders.
Some key players to these teams this year
Cretin- Boher, Zimmerman
White Bear- Villeneauve
Roseville- Mueller
Stillwater- Molstad, Johnson
Woodbury- Eddy
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:30 am
by Pucknutz69
Cretin - lost a lot, love Weyandt but unproven in nets.
WBL - Can this group ever get it together, success at youth ranks but this group has too many loose cannons
Roseville - Will be at or near the top of the SEC
Woodbury - lost a ton but comes right back with a spot at the top
Hastings - will be at the bottom for a while
CG - will be very young, Moser has set the tone
Stillwater - will be competitive 4-5 spot just warming up for next year
Forest Lake - like the goalie Moberg
Mounds View - will keep Hastings company
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:39 am
by SEC Scotty
Pucknutz69 wrote:Cretin - lost a lot, love Weyandt but unproven in nets.
WBL - Can this group ever get it together, success at youth ranks but this group has too many loose cannons
Roseville - Will be at or near the top of the SEC
Woodbury - lost a ton but comes right back with a spot at the top
Hastings - will be at the bottom for a while
CG - will be very young, Moser has set the tone
Stillwater - will be competitive 4-5 spot just warming up for next year
Forest Lake - like the goalie Moberg
Mounds View - will keep Hastings company
White Bear will be solid in goal and on the blue line. They do have one player in particular who likes to yap. Games are never dull when he is on the ice.
I agree that Park is a team to watch in the next few years. Moser will have an effect on the youth program as well as the high school program.
Should be a fun year with no clear cut favorite.
Hastings????
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:28 am
by hockey nut
Why is Hastings so bad, I thought they had a pretty good Bantam team a couple of years ago. Is Welch still the coach there?
Re: Hastings????
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:54 am
by Govs93
hockey nut wrote:Why is Hastings so bad, Is Welch still the coach there?
You answered your own question.
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:57 am
by Pucknutz69
They lost most of the Bantams from a few years ago. Cretin, St Thomas, Shattuck and Holy Angels all have them. That means they fill in with kids from the B teams. This is where CG and Woodbury have been for years and now they are starting to keep some at home. Welch is on his last year or 2.
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:41 am
by packerboy
Looks like we have some guys who know more than just a little bit about hockey in the best conference in the state.
Lets keep it going all year with updates on the teams and, of course, arguments about who is best and any controversies that arise.
There are a number of teams now that love to hate each other as some good rivalries have developed even though the conference isnt that old in its current form.
who did Hastings lose?
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:51 pm
by hockey nut
Who did Hastings lose. And I really think Park will be better with Jay Moser coaching. Any thoughts.
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:43 pm
by gophs12
Roseville- they lost pretty much all of there defense from last year. so they will be lacking there. they also have no standout players other then Meuller. so they will be so so.
White Bear Lake- they have solid defense and they have collete. they also just got Ryan Walter from Mounds veiw. he will be a good contribution to what they have now. White bear will contend.
Cretin- they always put together a solid squad. they got some good players. they will be one of the better ones this year.
Mounds View- they are ok. not alot though. middle of the pack team
Woodbury- they are finally coming around. they will be descent this year.
Stillwater- they got some good players but they lost a lot too. they are going to be better then most think.
Hastings and Cottage Grove- they are never that good. thats all that needs to be said.
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:03 pm
by mnhockey9009
HockeyNut, Hastings lost 6 players I believe to other teams that were on that ABantam team. Derek Stepan to Shattuck who just won a National Championship and committed to the Badgers. Charlie Raskob who I believe is captain at Holy Angels and playing 1st line D. Austin Lepley to Hill Murray who didn't play last year due to back injuries and is questionable this year. STA took three of them including Ryan Stepan who played varsity there. Alex Rivness who played half the year up, and Tom Caturia who played JV I believe. I am pretty sure on most these facts but could be mistaken. did they lose anyone to cretin pucknutz?
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:54 pm
by SEC Scotty
Hastings still has some good players. Waxlax a forward, Horsch on defense, and Kimmes in nets. Unless they flew the coop as well.
Roseville still has Morrison and Tilleson (sp) on the blueline.
White Bears scoring will have to come from Villneauve,Fiala,Dolfay,Swanson and other upperclassmen. I don't think Wolter will be expected to do much as a sophmore.
Cottage Grove has lost a lot of players over the years as well to the private schools. Darwitz, McClellan, Sova, among others.
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:33 am
by SEC9
CDH should take the title....
the next teams are a toss up with Woodbury, Roseville, WBL
Stillwater
MV
Park
Hastings
last i heard about villinueve is that he isnt playing...any updates?
also..look for mueller to have a HUGE year, he looked great at Elite
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:43 am
by chillout
Villneauve is practicing with the team right now and from what I know should be on the team.
But I also had heard a couple weeks ago that he might not make it because of certain reasons involving problems with the law. But my sources for this were from other schools making it hard to believe..
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 12:09 pm
by wbmd
chillout wrote:Villneauve is practicing with the team right now and from what I know should be on the team.
But I also had heard a couple weeks ago that he might not make it because of certain reasons involving problems with the law. But my sources for this were from other schools making it hard to believe..
Sounds like he's taking the role of Eric Hartzell/Jake Hansen.

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 12:37 pm
by chillout
Haha
Now that's good.
The "break-in" story is quite a classic now in White Bear...
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:04 pm
by sicknasty7722
Villneauve will be playing this year, but I believe he will have to sit out the first two games due to problems with the law. This season is the one we will find out if he's all what he is supposed to be because, rather than Hansen carrying him now, he will have to carry his line/the team. We'll see how he does.
Mueller should have a good season this year and a lot is to be expected from him, definately the player who will have to carry Roseville.
Also to SEC Scotty, scoring will have to come from Villneauve, Swanson, and Fiala, but I don't know how much you can expect from Dolfay. He is one of the weaker captains White Bear's ever had, and doesn't have much of a scoring sense. He played quite a few games last year on JV, and there he didn't stand out either.
I'm not too sure you can give this conference to Cretin yet, they've also lost a lot. I'd say it is very much so up for grabs.
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:20 pm
by chillout
Villneauve, forgetting his height issue, could really be a leader for the team and carry them. But I honestly don't see that happening, I've seen this kid have issues even on their "A" peewee state runner up team in '04. His mindset is just different then a good hockey player and leader. Unless he really pulls it together, I see him just once again being a very talented player that takes his potential and destroys it by trash talk and being the "tough guy."
Note on Dolfay...I'm pretty sure last year he did not play much because of some elbow/arm injury? Haven't seen him too much, but that was the case last year (atleast i heard), so things could be different this season.
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:32 pm
by crouching tiger
Villneauve is a crazy kid
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:45 am
by Gotothenetman
Thanks for all the quality info. It seems weird to me with how strong the Hastings Youth numbers are that they are stuggling so much at the High School Level.
Thanks for all the info
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:24 am
by Pucknutz69
They just lost a lot of kids from this age group. And for that matter they haven't had a strong group at the youth level since this group of Jrs and Srs. They have also lost some of thier best coaches, they had guys in positions for years they had a system and it worked, now they have a guy in the younger ages trying to clear a path for his little group. Sometimes getting rid of tradition and what works isn't the best ideas. It may look good for 3-4 years but is it the best for the long run?