Page 1 of 2
Rankings as of Dec. 2nd
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:47 am
by MNRinkRat
Feel free to post what your rankings are as well. I'm only going to do AA.
1/Edina
2/Roseau
3/Hill-Murray
4/Centennial
5/Holy Angels
6/Duluth East
7/Benilde-St. Margaret's
8/White Bear Lake
9/Eden Prairie
10/Blaine
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:16 am
by Neutron 14
WHERES FOREST LAKE?
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:07 pm
by goldenhockey20
1/Edina
2/Roseau
3/Hill-Murray
4/AHA
5/Centennial
6/Duluth East
7/Eden Prairie
8/Burnsville
9/Blaine
10/Jefferson
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:43 pm
by wbmd
Neutron 14 wrote:WHERES FOREST LAKE?
North of White Bear Lake
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:47 pm
by TTpuckster
wbmd wrote:Neutron 14 wrote:WHERES FOREST LAKE?
North of White Bear Lake
Now WBMD.
North of
HUGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Why not? It could happen!
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:51 pm
by Neutron 14
1/Edina
2/Hill-Murray
3/Roseau
4/Forest Lake
5/Holy Angels
6/Duluth East
7/Benilde-St. Margaret's
8/Minnetonka
9/Eden Prairie
10/Blaine
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:06 pm
by BIAFP
Roseau
Edina
Duluth East
EP
Burnsville
Blaine
Minnetonka
The rest are pretenders
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:36 pm
by pistol
2008 State Tourney Results:
1st Hill-Murray
2nd Duluth East
3rd Edina
4th Centennial
5th BSM
6th CDH
The rest of the top teams wish they played in Section 1 or 8.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:39 pm
by He Hate Me
pistol wrote:2008 State Tourney Results:
1st Hill-Murray
2nd Duluth East
3rd Edina
4th Centennial
5th BSM
6th CDH
The rest of the top teams wish they played in Section 1 or 8.
sir what about Roseau?
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:44 pm
by pistol
He Hate Me wrote:pistol wrote:The rest of the top teams wish they played in Section 1 or 8.
sir what about Roseau?
Are they not still Section 8, or have they already moved down to class A?
Regardless, there is no way to determine 7th or 8th place in the State Tourney, so in order not to play favorites, neither are listed.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:54 pm
by He Hate Me
sir 8AA- home of the Roseau Rams
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:04 pm
by pistol
Sorry, the Rams (lost to a Blaine team missing most of its key players) are out of contention this year.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:07 pm
by 2nd string
Let me see Roseau has played has played two games and has a two and zero record so, I'm not following
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:10 pm
by pistol
Check out the "new here" thread....
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:15 pm
by Neutron 14
He Hate Me wrote:sir 8AA- home of the Roseau Rams
If you only knew how far out of your league you are...
But I'm enjoying it just the same!
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:19 pm
by fkahckyprofessor20
This whole Blaine beating Roseau thread is getting way out of hand. It was a scrimmage!! Until somebody beats Roseau that shouldn't in a regular season game, they've got to be in everybody's top 5.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:22 pm
by pistol
Not EVERYBODY'S!
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:22 pm
by He Hate Me
out of my league? is there something i dont understand? i dont understand these people saying roseau is not good becuase they lost to Blaine in a scrimmage
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:26 pm
by Neutron 14
fkahckyprofessor20 wrote: they've got to be in everybody's top 5.
Everybody might be a little strong, stick with rational people and I'll agree. For now.
I don't understand why they have such a weak schedule though.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:49 pm
by petern3
Edina
Roseau
Hill Murray
Blaine
Duluth East
Burnsville
Centennial
Moorhead
Holy Angels
Minnetonka
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:02 am
by pucknstick10
Neutron 14 wrote:fkahckyprofessor20 wrote: they've got to be in everybody's top 5.
Everybody might be a little strong, stick with rational people and I'll agree. For now.
I don't understand why they have such a weak schedule though.
I am going to guess that Roseau's "weak" schedule as you put it has to do with geography more than anything else. It's just to far away to play the top metro teams in the state. It plays the teams in its area and a few teams out of the area.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:49 am
by wishock
Yes, if you look at a map it is pretty obvious. Remote part of the state. They play who they can without the 7 or 8 hour bus ride to every game.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:50 am
by Neutron 14
wishock wrote:Yes, if you look at a map it is pretty obvious. Remote part of the state. They play who they can without the 7 or 8 hour bus ride to every game.
Moorhead doesn't seem to have a problem, DE either...
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:54 am
by HockeyFan1
Neutron 14 wrote:wishock wrote:Yes, if you look at a map it is pretty obvious. Remote part of the state. They play who they can without the 7 or 8 hour bus ride to every game.
Moorhead doesn't seem to have a problem, DE either...
Here we go again.....
there's quite a difference between a 7+ hour bus ride, and a 2-3 hour bus ride my friend.......
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:58 am
by Neutron 14
Here we go again?
Moorhead to the Cities is a wee bit more than two hours my friend. I'm not saying every week, but one trip a year seems reasonable. Friday and Saturday night.