Page 1 of 2
I guess AHA won't go undefeated...
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:03 pm
by HShockeywatcher
Sure, 7 goals, but 8 GA?! What's the year look like for this team? That's two more goals than any team scored on them last year...
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:07 pm
by Bash Brother
They finally met up with a team who had the guns to stick with them
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:18 pm
by gostars4
so you are saying aha lost 8-7 to rosemount
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:32 pm
by gostars4
nevermind. aha still needs to learn how to play better as a team
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:48 pm
by Zamman
Yes AHA lost to Rosemount and on any given day you can beat anyone. Had this game been in January, the outcome would probably be different.
AHA was in complete control in the first period with Danny Mattson scoring a short-handed goal, then getting a second goal before Rosemount scored. IN the second period it was all Rosemount. They were hitting hard and putting everything on the net. They rattled off six goals before AHA got their third goal.
The third period was back and fourth hockey with Rosemount scoring each time AHA scored. Then AHA poured it on late in the third and got to within one, almost tying it up.
Shots were 34 - 24 for AHA, Brown for Rosemount got a hat-trick and Mattson for AHA got 5 points.
Not a bad game for AHA considering it was their first game with a whole bunch of young players. In a couple of weeks they will be clicking and this game will be just a notch in the loss column.
Rosemount is a pretty good team, they may make some noise in the section. They play hard and are real physical. they also have some pretty good forwards. Their goalie made some key saves tonight also.
I enjoyed the game....
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:53 pm
by Undercover Hockey Lover
Zamman wrote:I enjoyed the game....
Zamman...that says it all right there. AMEN.

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:19 pm
by shaneco
Rosemount dang near blew it in the last second too. It was the most ridiculous game I have seen. 15 goals in a game of top 20 teams.....Jesus, lol. Big props to HA for coming back and almost tying it after being down 7-4 at one point with about 6 min left in the game
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:42 pm
by Tigers33
Zamman-
I thought you retired from Richfield...
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:17 am
by Hockeyguy_27
Tigers33 wrote:Zamman-
I thought you retired from Richfield...
This doesn't surprise me. I watched these two teams play last year in the playoffs with in a similar back-and-forth type of game. Who was in goal for the Stars?
Rosemount might sneak up on everyone this year. They're talented.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:45 am
by BoogeyMan
Yes AHA lost to Rosemount and on any given day you can beat anyone. Had this game been in January, the outcome would probably be different.
Thats going out on a limb. I guess you could say. If this game was played this Sunday the outcome would be different too. Give Rosemount some credit.
Facts are, a good Rosemount team beat a good AHA team. From the sounds of it. AHA has been average so far this season. Must have been a bad recruiting year.
Or maybe the team is too young. Either way. AHA is playing like good team. Not a great team.
Good luck to AHA the rest of the way.........
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:36 am
by Zamman
Tigers33 wrote:Zamman-
I thought you retired from Richfield...
Nope I am still working there. Love my job and do not plan on leaving anytime soon.
"Rosemount is a pretty good team, they may make some noise in the section. They play hard and are real physical. they also have some pretty good forwards. Their goalie made some key saves tonight also."
That sounds like I was giving credit to Rosemount, and AHA has played only one game while Rosemount has played five. When AHA has their lines down and are playing all together, yes the outcome would be different.
As far as the recruiting shot, nice try. Last year there were 10 freshman on the JV and they are now sophomores and there are three freshman playing on the varsity.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:02 am
by breakout
Zamman wrote:Tigers33 wrote:Zamman-
I thought you retired from Richfield...
As far as the
recruiting shot, nice try. Last year there were 10 freshman on the JV and they are now sophomores and there are three freshman playing on the varsity.
Consider the source

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:20 am
by Neutron 14
breakout wrote:Zamman wrote:Tigers33 wrote:Zamman-
I thought you retired from Richfield...
As far as the
recruiting shot, nice try. Last year there were 10 freshman on the JV and they are now sophomores and there are three freshman playing on the varsity.
Consider the source

Speaking of sources, Zamman should have the honor of starting a thread when St. Thomas loses their first game.
I mean, whats with that? NOBODY was predicting AHA to go undefeated, yet the poster couldn't wait to rub AHA fans nose in it. Pathetic.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:30 am
by ROOK EYE
Face it Neutron. Same thing every year for AHA. No consistency.. Until they learn to play as a team they won't advance. C'mon This wasn't the first scrimmage of the year.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:33 am
by Neutron 14
ROOK EYE wrote:Face it Neutron. Same thing every year for AHA. No consistency.. Until they learn to play as a team they won't advance. C'mon This wasn't the first scrimmage of the year.
Where in my post do I make excuses as to why AHA lost?
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:40 am
by packerboy
Neutron 14 wrote:breakout wrote:Zamman wrote:
As far as the recruiting shot, nice try. Last year there were 10 freshman on the JV and they are now sophomores and there are three freshman playing on the varsity.
Consider the source

Speaking of sources, Zamman should have the honor of starting a thread when St. Thomas loses their first game.
I mean, whats with that? NOBODY was predicting AHA to go undefeated, yet the poster couldn't wait to rub AHA fans nose in it. Pathetic.
I thought you were ignoring him.
Yup, AHA is inconsitent every year. I especialy remember the years 2002 and 2005. Just terrible
I have yet to see a high school hockey team that is consistent.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:40 am
by ya-man
I'm surprised by this outcome. Not that AHA lost because I thought it would be a very good game based on last years section game. Rosemount has a very good team and I think they marked their schedule for this one. I'm just surprised by the score, I was certain that AHA would be a sound defensive team.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:12 am
by breakout
gostars4 wrote:so you are saying aha lost 8-7 to rosemount
It appears that AHA doesn't have problems scoring goals.
Maybe some work on D, team D (forwards helping defend) and goaltending?
Trebil is an outstanding coach. He will get the most out of what he's got.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:16 am
by kickinwing
aha is an amazing team . it seems the more they lose the better they are. i feel sorry for the irish they beat an inferior team , thats gotta hurt!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:18 am
by breakout
ROOK EYE wrote:Face it Neutron. Same thing every year for AHA. No consistency.. Until they learn to play as a team they won't advance. C'mon This wasn't the first scrimmage of the year.
What do you know about Holy Angels? Two of your three posts were about STA or STA players
Consistency? AHA has been consistently good for a number of years.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:49 am
by BladeButter44
What goaltender played in the game?
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:50 pm
by tjkhavgam
Boerger played. the other goalie is out a few weeks because of some things he did over the summer.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:57 pm
by BladeButter44
Is the other goalie the kid that was down at Shattuck for a few years? I can't think of the name but he is from Edina.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:59 pm
by pistol
packerboy wrote:I have yet to see a high school hockey team that is consistent.
Time to jump on someone else's bandwagon then?
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:59 pm
by TheMeanRichJokeMan
ROOK EYE wrote:Face it Neutron. Same thing every year for AHA. No consistency.. Until they learn to play as a team they won't advance. C'mon This wasn't the first scrimmage of the year.
Yep, No consistency at all for AHA. The haven't lost often in the last 5 years and have two state titles in that same amount of time. In fact I don't think anyone is even close in terms of winning percentage in the last 5-7 years.
They lost a game (one single game) which happened to the first of the season and suddenly they are inconsistent. Maybe you should look up consistent in the dictonary so you can fully understand the meaning of the word before you post it on the internet for all to see. AHA has been the definition of consistency in high school hockey.
I suspect you haven't heard the last of AHA this year. Anyone who thinks this means anything in the grand scheme of things is deluding themselves.