Little Falls Vs. Saint Cloud Apollo
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:49 pm
Will LF bounce back from the Cathedral loss?
HighSchoolHockeyForums.com
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Little Falls Vs. Saint Cloud Apollo
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:51 pm
Yes, they will with a nice W against the north-siders 4-1.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:59 pm
no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's!
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:13 pm
Goin with da upset pick, eh?i got balls wrote:I think Apollo comes out plays well the first line will score 4 goals Apollo wins 4-2
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:40 pm
LF-6
SCA-3
SCA-3
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:47 pm
I'm going with LF 6-2
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:05 pm
little falls doesnt lookk good. 7-1 eagles.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:07 pm
learn how to spell?buschleauge wrote:no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's!
hanowski
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:08 pm
I said that in an earlier thread as well. Maybe somebody needs to go back to spelling class in 3rd grade.[gspan] wrote:learn how to spell?buschleauge wrote:no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's!
hanowski
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:08 pm
nsideHocKey17 wrote:little falls doesnt lookk good. 7-1 eagles.
rofl.
stop being so biased, be a realist.
even if apollo can pull out a win, it won't be 7-1.
two solid first lines could end up being a wash, it might be up to the other lines to step up
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:09 pm
woah. replying to my post just seconds after, perhaps STC18 also has telekenesis powers...? it remains to be seenSTC18 wrote:I said that in an earlier thread as well. Maybe somebody needs to go back to spelling class in 3rd grade.[gspan] wrote:learn how to spell?buschleauge wrote:no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's!
hanowski
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:11 pm
sorry their last names arn't in the dictionary. only in small falls
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:18 pm
But aren't is.buschleauge wrote:sorry their last names arn't in the dictionary. only in small falls
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:40 pm
he has a point.buschleauge wrote:sorry their last names arn't in the dictionary. only in small falls
yuu kneed two prctise!
what's wrong with this sentence busch?
how about you try at home to correct it.
the correct sentence was:
you need to practice!
wasn't the fun?
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:04 am
Thank you, finally someone else to respond to this guys so far fetched comments...nsideHocKey17 wrote:
little falls doesnt lookk good. 7-1 eagles.
rofl.
stop being so biased, be a realist.
even if apollo can pull out a win, it won't be 7-1.
two solid first lines could end up being a wash, it might be up to the other lines to step up
LF- 4
SCA- 1
_______________________________
gspan actually not that big of a plug!
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:59 am
If the Eagles can stay out of the box this might be a very good game. They haven't shown me they can do that.
Little Falls 5
Apollo 2
Little Falls 5
Apollo 2
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:45 am
[gspan] wrote:he has a point.buschleauge wrote:sorry their last names arn't in the dictionary. only in small falls
yuu kneed two prctise!
what's wrong with this sentence busch?
how about you try at home to correct it.
the correct sentence was:
you need to practice!
Sheesh, for a guy commenting on spelling, maybe you should look into the proper use of capital letters.
wasn't the fun?
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:46 am
....and Little Falls gets a 4-3 win.
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:15 am
Another section 6A loss for Apollo.
Small Falls 6
Apollo 2
Small Falls 6
Apollo 2
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:17 am
i dont know i think this one has some real potental 
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:20 am
Apollo has more L's with teams we have played against, but the one W they have against Sauk brings me back to LF game against Sauk, was it a fluke? Or is LF going to run all over Apollo?
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:05 pm
I don't think they will run all over them but with the way Apollo has been playing lately I would definitely say that Small Falls is the heavy favorite.GopherPuckPlayer wrote:Apollo has more L's with teams we have played against, but the one W they have against Sauk brings me back to LF game against Sauk, was it a fluke? Or is LF going to run all over Apollo?
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:10 pm
heavier than Pat Williams
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:21 pm
Little Falls lost to Sauk Rapids who Apollo beat in the GCC. After that it has been down hill for Apollo but if they can put together a game that resembles the one they played against Sauk Rapids this could be a very good game.buschleauge wrote:heavier than Pat Williams
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:53 pm
LF-1
SCA-0
Waytashek with a power play goal
SCA-0
Waytashek with a power play goal