Page 1 of 1

Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:08 pm
by iceman23
They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:10 pm
by wbmd
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?
What's the date of the ratings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:12 pm
by sachishi4
1/12

yeah, that makes no sense

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:15 pm
by BIAFP
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:18 pm
by wbmd
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?
Guess it depends which ratings you're looking at.


Class A Rankings

FollowThePuck.com
As of 01/14/08

1. Duluth Marshall (7A) - 12-3-0
2. St. Thomas Academy (4A) - 12-3-0
3. International Falls (7A) - 13-1-0
4. Mankato West (1A) - 12-1-0
5. Warroad (8A) - 11-4-0
6. Mahtomedi (4A) - 9-4-2
7. St. Cloud Cathedral (5A) - 10-2-1
8. Little Falls (6A) - 12-3-0
9. Park Rapids Area (8A) - 15-0-0
10. South St. Paul (4A) - 9-3-1
11. Rochester Lourdes (1A) - 11-5-0
12. Albert Lea (1A) - 11-3-0
13. Red Wing (1A) - 8-5-2
14. New Prague (1A) - 9-3-0
15. Duluth Denfeld (5A) - 10-6-0
16. Hermantown (5A) - 8-7-0
17. Virginia/MI-B - 9-6-0
18. Mound-Westonka (2A) - 9-6-0
19. Breck School (2A) - 6-7-1
20. Holy Family Catholic - 8-4-0

On Watch:

Sauk Rapids-Rice - 8-5-1
Minnehaha Academy (4A) - 8-5-1
Fergus Falls - 6-4-3
Providence Academy - 9-3-1
Marshall - 11-3-1

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:28 pm
by iceman23
BIAFP wrote:
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
Maybe we would know if I Falls played any descent teams.

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:36 pm
by Can't Never Tried
What is that link for the Minnhock SOS?? I've seen it but can't remember where it is.

That may have some bearing on it for PS2, as well as the common opponent win/loss (BSM) and the SOS of that opponent. Just a thought.
As the FAQ says "1 game does not a season make"

Lee...care to chime in ??

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:37 pm
by crouching tiger
iceman23 wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
Maybe we would know if I Falls played any descent teams.
ive never heard of a "descent" team...so im not sure if that would help determine if I Falls is good or not.

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:59 pm
by east hockey
crouching tiger wrote:
iceman23 wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
Maybe we would know if I Falls played any descent teams.
ive never heard of a "descent" team...so im not sure if that would help determine if I Falls is good or not.
Descent; you know, as opposed to an "ascent" team. Image

Lee

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:06 pm
by elliott70
STA is in descent; as opposed to the ascent of Duluth TopoftheHill.

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:10 pm
by elliott70
But both teams are decent.

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:38 pm
by 7A22A
BIAFP wrote:
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:36 pm
by BIAFP
7A22A wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
iceman23 wrote:They beats STA pretty badly why are they second on the rankings?

Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:08 pm
by PuckRanger
BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote:I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
The Muskies are not to be taken lightly, they are 28-6 at this point of their season. They lost to Madison Edgewood by the same score that Duluth Marshall did in the Hilltopper Classic holiday tournament and they have blown out many Minnesota opponents this year and competes very closely with Shattuck-St. Mary's. This is a pretty good hockey team, folks.

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:46 pm
by 7A22A
PuckRanger wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote:I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
The Muskies are not to be taken lightly, they are 28-6 at this point of their season. They lost to Madison Edgewood by the same score that Duluth Marshall did in the Hilltopper Classic holiday tournament and they have blown out many Minnesota opponents this year and competes very closely with Shattuck-St. Mary's. This is a pretty good hockey team, folks.
Just to clarify. SSM Midget team. I've seen them too.

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:13 pm
by 7A22A
BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
Actually, I prefer Lake of the Woods.

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:08 am
by theref
BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
Because I. Falls is much better than DM. :lol:
I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
He obviously doesn't understand how the whole American-Canadian Exhange rate works. Every cheapshot the Falls takes, the Fort gets to retaliate with two :D .......forgot that the exhange rate is bad until just now. There is something "different" about playing over there though. Very tough building to play in against a very good team.

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:06 am
by HShockeywatcher
It would be funny if that were remotely close to true. The US-Canadian exchange rate is, and has been for quite some time now, 1:1.

Re: Why is DM still second on rankings?

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:21 am
by theref
theref wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
7A22A wrote: I was worried that I Falls may be able to repeat what Hermantown did last year. Then I watched the Fort Frances team that beat them 4-0. Not so worried now.

You ever played a game in The Fort?
He obviously doesn't understand how the whole American-Canadian Exhange rate works. Every cheapshot the Falls takes, the Fort gets to retaliate with two :D .......forgot that the exhange rate is bad until just now. There is something "different" about playing over there though. Very tough building to play in against a very good team.
Good call, go back under your rock now. :roll: