Page 1 of 2

S.E.C. schedule (week of Jan. 27th)

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:55 am
by wbmd
Woodbury 9-2-0 & 14-6-0
Jan. 31st vs. Stillwater
Feb. 2nd vs. Hastings

White Bear Lake 8-2-0 & 14-5-0
Jan. 29th vs. Stillwater
Jan. 31st vs. Forest Lake

Roseville 8-3-0 & 12-7-0
Jan. 31st at Hastings
Feb. 2nd at Forest Lake

Forest Lake 8-5-0 & 12-8-0
Jan. 31st at White Bear Lake
Feb. 2nd vs. Roseville

Cretin 7-4-0 & 8-11-0
Jan. 29th at Duluth Marshall
Jan. 31st vs. Mounds View
Feb. 2nd vs. Park

Stillwater 5-8-0 & 7-11-1
Jan. 29th at White Bear Lake
Jan. 31st at Woodbury

Hastings 4-8-0 & 7-13-0
Jan. 31st vs. Roseville
Feb. 2nd at Woodbury

Mounds View 2-9-0 & 8-10-0
Jan. 31st at Cretin

Park (Cottage Grove) 1-11-0 & 5-15-0
Jan. 29th at South St. Paul
Feb. 2nd at Cretin

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:08 pm
by SECHockeyFan
All must-wins for WB, Woodbury and Roseville. If Roseville loses this week, they are probably out of contention for the conference. If WB or Woodbury loses, it will hurt them going into the final game of the year when they face off against each other. None of those teams can afford an upset at this point of the season.

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:34 pm
by who_b_dat
At this point, it's Woodhood's title to lose. My crystal ball predicts a final of:

Woodbury 13-3
White Bear 12-4
Roseville 12-4

All play each other one more time and the race is close. This exemplifies how important each heads up game will be. CDH is also a common opponent to all and is capable of playing spoiler.

One loss by any of these three from here on out may not be the end of the world. Two, however, would likely kill any chance for an SEC title.

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:55 pm
by wbmd
who_b_dat wrote:At this point, it's Woodhood's title to lose. My crystal ball predicts a final of:

Woodbury 13-3
White Bear 12-4
Roseville 12-4

All play each other one more time and the race is close. This exemplifies how important each heads up game will be. CDH is also a common opponent to all and is capable of playing spoiler.

One loss by any of these three from here on out may not be the end of the world. Two, however, would likely kill any chance for an SEC title.
As is Forest Lake.

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:59 pm
by SECHockeyFan
wbmd wrote:
who_b_dat wrote:At this point, it's Woodhood's title to lose. My crystal ball predicts a final of:

Woodbury 13-3
White Bear 12-4
Roseville 12-4

All play each other one more time and the race is close. This exemplifies how important each heads up game will be. CDH is also a common opponent to all and is capable of playing spoiler.

One loss by any of these three from here on out may not be the end of the world. Two, however, would likely kill any chance for an SEC title.
As is Forest Lake.
Honestly, I don't think Forest Lake is going to pull any more upsets on the big 3 in the SEC: WB, Woodbury and Roseville. They may have surprised some teams at the beginning of the year, but now no one will underestimate them.

Yes, they beat CDH last night, but CDH is not very good and are extremely inconsistent.

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:05 pm
by saintpaulhockey
Yes, they beat CDH last night, but CDH is not very good and are extremely inconsistent


I would'nt jump to conclusions. Forest Lake was outplayed last night, CDH scored on their own net with no FLake players within 20 yards, and Forest Lake scored twice on weak shots from the perimeter. CDH is playing complacent, but be warned - they have a top 5 schedule in state and have the potential to beat any team in the SEC. Forest Lake also has the same potential because they play so physical and their goaltending is so solid.

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:13 pm
by SECHockeyFan
saintpaulhockey wrote:
Yes, they beat CDH last night, but CDH is not very good and are extremely inconsistent


I would'nt jump to conclusions. Forest Lake was outplayed last night, CDH scored on their own net with no FLake players within 20 yards, and Forest Lake scored twice on weak shots from the perimeter. CDH is playing complacent, but be warned - they have a top 5 schedule in state and have the potential to beat any team in the SEC. Forest Lake also has the same potential because they play so physical and their goaltending is so solid.
They sure had "solid goaltending" when they lost 10-0 to WB earlier this year. Forest Lake is NOT good, they're just better than they usually are.

Re: S.E.C. schedule (week of Jan. 27th)

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:41 am
by Pucknutz69
wbmd wrote:Woodbury 9-2-0 & 14-6-0
Jan. 31st vs. Stillwater
Feb. 2nd vs. Hastings

White Bear Lake 8-2-0 & 14-5-0
Jan. 29th vs. Stillwater
Jan. 31st vs. Forest Lake

Roseville 8-3-0 & 12-7-0
Jan. 31st at Hastings
Feb. 2nd at Forest Lake

Forest Lake 8-5-0 & 12-8-0
Jan. 31st at White Bear Lake
Feb. 2nd vs. Roseville

Cretin 7-4-0 & 8-11-0
Jan. 29th at Duluth Marshall
Jan. 31st vs. Mounds View
Feb. 2nd vs. Park

Stillwater 5-8-0 & 7-12-0
Jan. 29th at White Bear Lake
Jan. 31st at Woodbury

Hastings 4-8-0 & 7-13-0
Jan. 31st vs. Roseville
Feb. 2nd at Woodbury

Mounds View 2-9-0 & 8-10-0
Jan. 31st at Cretin

Park (Cottage Grove) 1-11-0 & 5-15-0
Jan. 29th at South St. Paul
Feb. 2nd at Cretin


STillwater and WBL play on 2/2 at Aldrich.

Re: S.E.C. schedule (week of Jan. 27th)

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:27 am
by formerlybackofnet
Pucknutz69 wrote:
wbmd wrote:Woodbury 9-2-0 & 14-6-0
Jan. 31st vs. Stillwater
Feb. 2nd vs. Hastings

White Bear Lake 8-2-0 & 14-5-0
Jan. 29th vs. Stillwater
Jan. 31st vs. Forest Lake

Roseville 8-3-0 & 12-7-0
Jan. 31st at Hastings
Feb. 2nd at Forest Lake

Forest Lake 8-5-0 & 12-8-0
Jan. 31st at White Bear Lake
Feb. 2nd vs. Roseville

Cretin 7-4-0 & 8-11-0
Jan. 29th at Duluth Marshall
Jan. 31st vs. Mounds View
Feb. 2nd vs. Park

Stillwater 5-8-0 & 7-12-0
Jan. 29th at White Bear Lake
Jan. 31st at Woodbury

Hastings 4-8-0 & 7-13-0
Jan. 31st vs. Roseville
Feb. 2nd at Woodbury

Mounds View 2-9-0 & 8-10-0
Jan. 31st at Cretin

Park (Cottage Grove) 1-11-0 & 5-15-0
Jan. 29th at South St. Paul
Feb. 2nd at Cretin


STillwater and WBL play on 2/2 at Aldrich.
All the schedules I have say WB/Stillwater on 1/29. and WB does not play on 2/2.

Re: S.E.C. schedule (week of Jan. 27th)

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:23 am
by wbmd
formerlybackofnet wrote:
Pucknutz69 wrote:
wbmd wrote:Woodbury 9-2-0 & 14-6-0
Jan. 31st vs. Stillwater
Feb. 2nd vs. Hastings

White Bear Lake 8-2-0 & 14-5-0
Jan. 29th vs. Stillwater
Jan. 31st vs. Forest Lake

Roseville 8-3-0 & 12-7-0
Jan. 31st at Hastings
Feb. 2nd at Forest Lake

Forest Lake 8-5-0 & 12-8-0
Jan. 31st at White Bear Lake
Feb. 2nd vs. Roseville

Cretin 7-4-0 & 8-11-0
Jan. 29th at Duluth Marshall
Jan. 31st vs. Mounds View
Feb. 2nd vs. Park

Stillwater 5-8-0 & 7-12-0
Jan. 29th at White Bear Lake
Jan. 31st at Woodbury

Hastings 4-8-0 & 7-13-0
Jan. 31st vs. Roseville
Feb. 2nd at Woodbury

Mounds View 2-9-0 & 8-10-0
Jan. 31st at Cretin

Park (Cottage Grove) 1-11-0 & 5-15-0
Jan. 29th at South St. Paul
Feb. 2nd at Cretin


STillwater and WBL play on 2/2 at Aldrich.
All the schedules I have say WB/Stillwater on 1/29. and WB does not play on 2/2.
EXACTLY!!

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:02 am
by Pucknutz69
White Bears Schedule
11/27/2007 Hastings 4 - 0 W
12/1/2007 Moorhead 6 - 5 W
12/7/2007 Duluth East 3 - 2 W
12/8/2007 C-E-C Lumberjacks 0 - 3 L
12/15/2007 Park 0 - 0
12/20/2007 Forest Lake 10 - 0 W
12/22/2007 Hill-Murray School 2 - 5 L
12/27/2007 Hill-Murray School 3 - 6 L
12/28/2007 Roseville Area 2 - 1 W
1/3/2008 Stillwater Area 4 - 1 W
1/5/2008 Roseville Area 0 - 5 L
1/10/2008 Cretin-Derham Hall 0 - 0 T
1/12/2008 Woodbury 3 - 2 W
1/17/2008 Hastings 6 - 1 W
1/19/2008 Mounds View 3 - 1 W
1/24/2008 Rochester Century 3 - 1 W
1/26/2008 Park 0 - 0
1/31/2008 Forest Lake 0 - 0
2/2/2008 Stillwater Area 0 - 0
2/7/2008 Roseville Area 0 - 0
2/9/2008 Cretin-Derham Hall 0 - 0
2/12/2008 Mounds View 0 - 0
2/14/2008 Woodbury 0 - 0



Stillwater Schedule
11/29/2007 Breck School 4 - 2 W
12/1/2007 Benilde-St. Margaret's School 2 - 4 L
12/6/2007 Roseville Area 2 - 5 L
12/8/2007 Cretin-Derham Hall 2 - 3 L
12/13/2007 Mounds View 5 - 3 W
12/15/2007 Hastings 4 - 2 W
12/20/2007 Woodbury 1 - 4 L
12/22/2007 Forest Lake 2 - 5 L
12/26/2007 Champlin Park 4 - 0 W
12/27/2007 Mahtomedi 3 - 3 T
12/28/2007 Maple Grove 2 - 3 L
1/3/2008 White Bear Lake Area 1 - 4 L
1/5/2008 Park 3 - 0 W
1/10/2008 Forest Lake 0 - 2 L
1/12/2008 Grand Rapids 1 - 6 L
1/17/2008 Roseville Area 2 - 0 W
1/19/2008 Cretin-Derham Hall 1 - 3 L
1/24/2008 Mounds View 0 - 2 L
1/26/2008 Hastings 3 - 1 W
1/31/2008 Woodbury 0 - 0
2/2/2008 White Bear Lake Area 0 - 0
2/5/2008 Park 0 - 0
2/8/2008 C-E-C Lumberjacks 0 - 0
2/9/2008 Duluth East 0 - 0
2/14/2008 Academy of Holy Angels 0 - 0

This is off the MSHSL site, point streak and maxpreps is wrong.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:23 am
by wbmd
Pucknutz69 wrote:White Bears Schedule
11/27/2007 Hastings 4 - 0 W
12/1/2007 Moorhead 6 - 5 W
12/7/2007 Duluth East 3 - 2 W
12/8/2007 C-E-C Lumberjacks 0 - 3 L
12/15/2007 Park 0 - 0
12/20/2007 Forest Lake 10 - 0 W
12/22/2007 Hill-Murray School 2 - 5 L
12/27/2007 Hill-Murray School 3 - 6 L
12/28/2007 Roseville Area 2 - 1 W
1/3/2008 Stillwater Area 4 - 1 W
1/5/2008 Roseville Area 0 - 5 L
1/10/2008 Cretin-Derham Hall 0 - 0 T
1/12/2008 Woodbury 3 - 2 W
1/17/2008 Hastings 6 - 1 W
1/19/2008 Mounds View 3 - 1 W
1/24/2008 Rochester Century 3 - 1 W
1/26/2008 Park 0 - 0
1/31/2008 Forest Lake 0 - 0
2/2/2008 Stillwater Area 0 - 0
2/7/2008 Roseville Area 0 - 0
2/9/2008 Cretin-Derham Hall 0 - 0
2/12/2008 Mounds View 0 - 0
2/14/2008 Woodbury 0 - 0



Stillwater Schedule
11/29/2007 Breck School 4 - 2 W
12/1/2007 Benilde-St. Margaret's School 2 - 4 L
12/6/2007 Roseville Area 2 - 5 L
12/8/2007 Cretin-Derham Hall 2 - 3 L
12/13/2007 Mounds View 5 - 3 W
12/15/2007 Hastings 4 - 2 W
12/20/2007 Woodbury 1 - 4 L
12/22/2007 Forest Lake 2 - 5 L
12/26/2007 Champlin Park 4 - 0 W
12/27/2007 Mahtomedi 3 - 3 T
12/28/2007 Maple Grove 2 - 3 L
1/3/2008 White Bear Lake Area 1 - 4 L
1/5/2008 Park 3 - 0 W
1/10/2008 Forest Lake 0 - 2 L
1/12/2008 Grand Rapids 1 - 6 L
1/17/2008 Roseville Area 2 - 0 W
1/19/2008 Cretin-Derham Hall 1 - 3 L
1/24/2008 Mounds View 0 - 2 L
1/26/2008 Hastings 3 - 1 W
1/31/2008 Woodbury 0 - 0
2/2/2008 White Bear Lake Area 0 - 0
2/5/2008 Park 0 - 0
2/8/2008 C-E-C Lumberjacks 0 - 0
2/9/2008 Duluth East 0 - 0
2/14/2008 Academy of Holy Angels 0 - 0

This is off the MSHSL site, point streak and maxpreps is wrong.
I didn't get it off of MAXPREPS.COM.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:32 am
by wbmd

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:41 am
by greyhoundsnation27
Both suburbaneast.org and Stillwater's website have it listed on 1/29

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:47 am
by wbmd
greyhoundsnation27 wrote:Both suburbaneast.org and Stillwater's website have it listed on 1/29
As well as Maxpreps.com.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:52 am
by greyhoundsnation27
As well as...never mind, I think we all get it now

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:55 am
by Pucknutz69
you are right wbdoc, sorry. just got "offical" word that it has been changed. otherwise everything we have as in team schedule not off websites was for 2/2. as in bus schedule and other info.

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:45 pm
by wbmd
Makes it an even more interesting race now that Stillwater edged White Bear 5-4 in O.T. Tuesday night.

Can the Ponies surprise Woodbury as well Thursday night at Bielenberg?

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:10 pm
by SECHockeyFan
wbmd wrote:Makes it an even more interesting race now that Stillwater edged White Bear 5-4 in O.T. Tuesday night.

Can the Ponies surprise Woodbury as well Thursday night at Bielenberg?
I bet WB fans are hoping they can. Forest Lake is put in another bad position vs. White Bear. First, WB was angry about the loss to Park, now it's a loss to Stillwater. In addition to this, apparently it is senior night in White Bear.

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:21 pm
by whitebearsuperfanB
HAHA SEC love the Ginos all day quote at the bottom. Wolters as well as Hoffman not playing yesterday clearly made the bears a much weaker team. I would not want to be Forest Lake but this definitly makes the SEC race a lot closer especially if white bear wins at Roseville in about a week.

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:40 pm
by wbmd
whitebearsuperfanB wrote:HAHA SEC love the Ginos all day quote at the bottom. Wolters as well as Hoffman not playing yesterday clearly made the bears a much weaker team. I would not want to be Forest Lake but this definitly makes the SEC race a lot closer especially if white bear wins at Roseville in about a week.
Wolter and Hoffman hurt?

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:42 pm
by SECHockeyFan
wbmd wrote:
whitebearsuperfanB wrote:HAHA SEC love the Ginos all day quote at the bottom. Wolters as well as Hoffman not playing yesterday clearly made the bears a much weaker team. I would not want to be Forest Lake but this definitly makes the SEC race a lot closer especially if white bear wins at Roseville in about a week.
Wolter and Hoffman hurt?
Hoffman was sick and Wolter bruised his hip against Park. Wolter will probably miss tomorrow's game. I assume Hoffman will play.

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:59 pm
by whitebearsuperfanB
Wolters will be out tomorrow and Hoffman was sick at school again today so if he comes to school tomorrow he would be allowed to play if he feels well enough..

GINOS ALL DAY

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:51 am
by packerboy
This thing is a long way from over.

Woodbury has been the most consistent team but that could change.

CDH put themselves behind the 8 ball with the loss to FLake but they have a chance to get back in it with games vs MV, Park and then WBL, Woodbury, and Roseville.


Its still Up for Grabs

4 losses may get you a piece of it.

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:54 am
by wbmd
packerboy wrote:This thing is a long way from over.

Woodbury has been the most consistent team but that could change.

CDH put themselves behind the 8 ball with the loss to FLake but they have a chance to get back in it with games vs MV, Park and then WBL, Woodbury, and Roseville.


Its still Up for Grabs

4 losses may get you a piece of it.
That's for sure.