Page 1 of 17

4AA

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:49 am
by TheHockeyDJ
I'm curious as to what the seedings will look like for this section. Also I noticed a playoff date for this section is Tuesday, Feb. 26 @ the Colesium. Is that a double header for the semi-finals? If so, sweet. Then I'll only have Monday that week that I need to fill with a game.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:41 am
by Pioneerprideguy
My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:50 am
by Govs93
Pioneerprideguy wrote:My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como
You got #7 & #1 backwards.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:51 am
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
Govs93 wrote:
Pioneerprideguy wrote:My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como
You got #7 & #1 backwards.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:00 pm
by Pioneerprideguy
Sorry, typo. Damn private school education!

Re: 4AA

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:07 pm
by ImissMYhockey
rapidsrapids wrote:I'm curious as to what the seedings will look like for this section. Also I noticed a playoff date for this section is Tuesday, Feb. 26 @ the Colesium. Is that a double header for the semi-finals? If so, sweet. Then I'll only have Monday that week that I need to fill with a game.
Usually the winners of the #1 and #4 seed games play on tuesday and the winners of the #2 and #3 seed games play on wednesday. The first game is the semis of another section, last year I believe it was 4 with wayzata, anoka, blaine, etc. This year is it 5AA?

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:14 pm
by parrish4president
Govs93 wrote:
Pioneerprideguy wrote:My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como
You got #7 & #1 backwards.
yea, thats a pretty critical error

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:17 pm
by Govs93
parrish4president wrote:
Govs93 wrote:
Pioneerprideguy wrote:My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como
You got #7 & #1 backwards.
yea, thats a pretty critical error


Well I mean, c'mon. If you're going to post rankings, at least make it look like you know what you're talking about. Sheesh.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:20 pm
by pioneers
In looking at the dates, Feb 20, 23 Aldrich Arena I would say the 20th would be the sub section games and the 23rd would be the quarterfinals. The next dates are the 26th and the 29th. I would guess the 26th would be the semifinals and possibly they would play them back to back at the Coliseum as they have 5AA at the Coliseum on the 27th. Looks like it will be 5AA and then 4AA finals on the 29th.

http://mshsl.org/mshsl/activitypage.asp?actnum=410

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:16 pm
by hockey champs 08
Pioneerprideguy wrote:My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como
I agree with the seedings. but the 3 and 4 seed could be flip flopped.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:21 pm
by whitebearsuperfanB
Pioneerprideguy wrote:My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como
3 and 4 could be switched and so could 5 and 6 but the seedings look good.. looking forward to what looks like yet another white bear, hill murray section championship...

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:48 am
by ImissMYhockey
Pioneerprideguy wrote:My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como
I would flip 4 and 5 and also 2 and 3 but thats cuz I think MV will beat Tartan and Roseville will beat WB when they play each other again. Otherwise for right now it looks good

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:27 pm
by parrish4president
this should be a walk for hill, I dont see them losing it

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:33 pm
by wbmd
parrish4president wrote:this should be a walk for hill, I dont see them losing it
Neither do I. But then again, it's the playoffs where just about anything can happen.

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:34 pm
by formerlybackofnet
parrish4president wrote:this should be a walk for hill, I dont see them losing it
I kind of agree with you, but any one of the top 4 or 5 seeds are capable of beating Hill. If they do end up playing WBL, that game will not be a cakewalk.

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:12 pm
by Pioneerprideguy
parrish4president wrote:this should be a walk for hill, I dont see them losing it
I read the same things about AHA the previous 2 yrs. I'll say it is Hill's section to lose and strange things have been known to happen come sections...that's what makes it such a special time. Having said that, if Hill plays at there best, they will win this section.

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:25 pm
by hockeyxfan01
formerlybackofnet wrote:
parrish4president wrote:this should be a walk for hill, I dont see them losing it
I kind of agree with you, but any one of the top 4 or 5 seeds are capable of beating Hill. If they do end up playing WBL, that game will not be a cakewalk.
Agreed; if Hill comes into section finals too cocky they could definately lose, especially to White Bear when there is such a big rivalry.

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:55 pm
by yaman
It takes a deliberate planned attack with a hot goalie. I see any one of #2 through 6 capable of beating Hill.

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:46 am
by parrish4president
hockeyxfan01 wrote:
formerlybackofnet wrote:
parrish4president wrote:this should be a walk for hill, I dont see them losing it
I kind of agree with you, but any one of the top 4 or 5 seeds are capable of beating Hill. If they do end up playing WBL, that game will not be a cakewalk.
Agreed; if Hill comes into section finals too cocky they could definately lose, especially to White Bear when there is such a big rivalry.
good points, I would love to see an upset in this section

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:27 pm
by hockey champs 08
Pioneerprideguy wrote:My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como
The top 4 teams are in good shape to keep what seed you put them in it will be a great section championship if Hill losses :lol: . Tartan is only 2 games behind WB for the two or three seed. what is Rosevilles' record anyways.

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:53 pm
by wbmd
hockey champs 08 wrote:
Pioneerprideguy wrote:My initial seedings:

1). HM
2). WB
3). Rose
4). Tartan
5). MV
6). Stillwater
7). Johnson
8). NSP
9). Como
The top 4 teams are in good shape to keep what seed you put them in it will be a great section championship if Hill losses :lol: . Tartan is only 2 games behind WB for the two or three seed. what is Rosevilles' record anyways.
Roseville is 12-7-0

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:11 am
by formerlybackofnet
The winner of the 2/7 WB/Roseville game will probably deciede the #2 seed.

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:25 pm
by ImissMYhockey
when mv plays tartan, Im sure the winner will be in the 4 5 game, but if MV were to win would stillwater or tartan be in that game with them

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:09 pm
by hockeypuck02
This section is tough to predict just based on what has happened so far in the regular season. Hill is the best team in theory but the fact that they split their regular season matchup with Tartan could make for an interesting 1 vs. 4 semifinal if those seedings hold true. White Bear and Roseville have split the first two with the rubber match coming soon, Stillwater and White Bear split in the regular season too. All this (and what is yet to come in the final weeks of conference play) leads me to believe this will be one of the better "formerly known as Section 3AA" tournaments in a long time.

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:34 pm
by pucks/sticks
Why wouldn't Stillwater be ahead of both MV and Tartan? Stillwater is 8-9 in conferance and MV is 3-10.