Page 1 of 1
SUBURBAN EAST SCHEDULE (week of Feb. 3rd)
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:33 am
by wbmd
There are some big games going on this week as the race for the conference title is down to four teams.
Woodbury 11-2-0 & 16-6-0
Feb. 7th vs. Cretin
Feb. 9th vs. Roseville
Roseville 10-3-0 & 14-7-0
Feb. 7th vs. White Bear Lake
Feb. 9th at Woodbury
White Bear Lake 9-3-0 & 15-6-0
Feb. 7th at Roseville
Feb. 9th at Cretin
Cretin 9-4-0 & 10-11-0
Feb. 7th at Woodbury
Feb. 9th vs. White Bear Lake
Forest Lake 8-7-0 & 12-10-0
Feb. 9th vs. St. Paul Johnson
Stillwater 6-9-0 & 8-12-1
Feb. 5th vs. Park (Cottage Grove)
Feb. 8th vs. Cloquet
Feb. 9th vs. Duluth East
Hastings 4-10-0 & 7-15-0
Feb. 7th vs. Mounds View
Mounds View 2-10-0 & 8-11-0
Feb. 5th vs. Tartan
Feb. 7th at Hastings
Feb. 9th at Park (Cottage Grove)
Park (Cottage Grove) 1-12-0 & 5-17-0
Feb. 5th at Stillwater
Feb. 9th vs. Mounds View
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:57 pm
by whitebearsuperfanB
With White Bear, Roseville and Woodbury all having tough schedules coming up this could make for a very interesting race for the SEC title
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:03 pm
by wbmd
whitebearsuperfanB wrote:With White Bear, Roseville and Woodbury all having tough schedules coming up this could make for a very interesting race for the SEC title
Don't count Cretin out of it either.
Re: SUBURBAN EAST SCHEDULE (week of Feb. 3rd)
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:53 pm
by komada77
wbmd wrote:There are some big games going on this week as the race for the conference title is down to four teams.
Woodbury 11-2-0 & 16-6-0
Feb. 7th vs. Cretin
Feb. 9th vs. Roseville
Roseville 10-3-0 & 14-7-0
Feb. 7th vs. White Bear Lake
Feb. 9th at Woodbury
White Bear Lake 9-3-0 & 15-6-0
Feb. 7th at Roseville
Feb. 9th at Cretin
Cretin 9-4-0 & 10-11-0
Feb. 7th at Woodbury
Feb. 9th vs. White Bear Lake
Forest Lake 8-7-0 & 12-10-0
Feb. 9th vs. St. Paul Johnson
Stillwater 6-9-0 & 8-12-1
Feb. 5th vs. Park (Cottage Grove)
Feb. 8th vs. Cloquet
Feb. 9th vs. Duluth East
Hastings 4-10-0 & 7-15-0
Feb. 7th vs. Mounds View
Mounds View 2-10-0 & 8-11-0
Feb. 5th vs. Tartan
Feb. 7th at Hastings
Feb. 9th at Park (Cottage Grove)
Park (Cottage Grove) 1-12-0 & 5-17-0
Feb. 5th at Stillwater
Feb. 9th vs. Mounds View
it's weird how the top 4 teams in the conference all play only each other this week. on a different note, should WBL and Woodbury both win their next games (3 for WBL, 2 for the Royals) the Feb. 14th showdown at aldrich between the 2 could be one of the best games of the year, especially after the fight during their last meeting
nice
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:27 am
by HastingsDangler02
That is pretty funny and a coincidence how the top 4 teams only play each other this week. Kinda crazy...
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:19 am
by packerboy
CDH has to run the table and hope somebody else beats Woodbury.
If Woodbury wins 2 of 3 they will win it.
WBL and Roseville have to beat Woodbury and hope CDH does to.
So, let's all gang up on Woodbury.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:53 am
by who_b_dat
packerboy wrote:If Woodbury wins 2 of 3 they will win it.
What is the tie break if Roseville or WB can match them in conference record? Heads up or other???
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:20 am
by packerboy
I am not sure but I think its co-champs.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:06 pm
by gophs12
ya the tie breaker would be head to head. all it comes down to is who can run the table. whoever does will win the conference.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 12:57 pm
by formerlybackofnet
gophs12 wrote:ya the tie breaker would be head to head. all it comes down to is who can run the table. whoever does will win the conference.
There is no tie breaker, if 2 teams tie for the conf. lead, they become co-champs. Head to head play is not a tie breaker.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:10 pm
by packerboy
This interesting.
Except for Woodbury, the teams that lose tonight chances become slim... or none if its CDH.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:40 pm
by who_b_dat
CDH is out of the conference title race.
Due to their tie tonight, Roseville and White Bear have a shot but its slim.
Woodbury would need to lose to both Rose and WB. A win in either game and they cinch.
WB and Rose need to win out. That means:
WB need to best CDH, MV and Woodhood
Rose needs to top Woodhood and CDH
It remains Woodbury's title to lose.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:42 pm
by komada77
who_b_dat wrote:CDH is out of the conference title race.
Due to their tie tonight, Roseville and White Bear have a shot but its slim.
Woodbury would need to lose to both Rose and WB. A win in either game and they cinch.
WB and Rose need to win out. That means:
WB need to best CDH, MV and Woodhood
Rose needs to top Woodhood and CDH
It remains Woodbury's title to lose.
well that clears a lot up thank you
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:11 pm
by wbmd
Woodbury can clinch the title with a win over Roseville Saturday night.
A tie for Woodbury against Roseville also guarantees at least a tie for the conference title.
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 1:50 am
by who_b_dat
wbmd wrote:A tie for Woodbury against Roseville also guarantees at least a tie for the conference title.
Not a guarantee yet wbmd. A tie w/ Rose would mean that White Bear could match Woodbury for a share
only if the Bears run the table against CDH, MV and Woodbury.
Woodbury would still have the potential for a W or a T against WB next Thursday to lock up sole possession.
Im rooting for two Woodbury losses
but they have been relatively solid all year and I don't expect a complete breakdown.
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:51 pm
by wbmd
who_b_dat wrote:wbmd wrote:A tie for Woodbury against Roseville also guarantees at least a tie for the conference title.
Not a guarantee yet wbmd. A tie w/ Rose would mean that White Bear could match Woodbury for a share
only if the Bears run the table against CDH, MV and Woodbury.
And that is why I said that a tie for Woodbury tonight against Roseville '
guarantees at least a tie for the conference title.'