Page 1 of 1
School Record..
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:38 pm
by Rbkhockey21
Im not sure if many people really care about this but I thought i'd just give some credit out to this years '07-'08 Rosemount team who with last nights 8-5 win over LN they set a new school record for most wins in a season..
Congrats and keep up the great work making us alum proud!
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:17 pm
by FoSho
yea we're pretty good
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:27 pm
by STC18
FoSho wrote:yea we're pretty good
Ya know what they sayyy..."Karma's a B****....fo sho."
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:31 pm
by SiouxRecruit
Breaking any record is always a nice thing..congrats to them
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:53 pm
by Fargo
SiouxRecruit wrote:Breaking any record is always a nice thing..congrats to them
Ditto congrats
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:03 pm
by hockey1410
How many wins?
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:05 pm
by SiouxRecruit
hockey1410 wrote:How many wins?
probably atleast one more than the previous record.....and im just taking a stab at it....
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:08 pm
by Rbkhockey21
SiouxRecruit wrote:hockey1410 wrote:How many wins?
probably atleast one more than the previous record.....and im just taking a stab at it....
yes it is at least one more than the previous record of 17 wins set back in 1985. So yes the new record stands at 18
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:17 pm
by Bash Brother
Lets hope they can continue to win. This lake race is great stuff.
..
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:03 am
by Jacketfan06
Congrats to Rosemount
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:16 am
by Cabela10
Why isn't Rosemount in the Classic Suburban? They are in a conference with West-Southwest schools.
What district does Rosemounts Youth program play in?
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:25 pm
by eagle4life9
When I played they were always in district 8 with the Lakevilles, Woodbury, Eagan, etc.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:00 am
by hockeydad
Cabela10 wrote:Why isn't Rosemount in the Classic Suburban? They are in a conference with West-Southwest schools.
What district does Rosemounts Youth program play in?
Rosemount has been in the Lake since they and Apple Valley left the Missota in the mid '80s.
and, as most people know, Rosemount, Eagan, Apple Valley and Eastview are all part of the same school district. Until the mid'70s (1976, i think) there was only one high school in that district - Rosemount. The others opened as the District grew (Eagan in the 80s, Eastview in the 90s).
That said, they are a perfect fit in the Lake, which has seven of its 11 schools in Dakota County.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:03 am
by CrossbarandIn99
COngrats to Rosemount, they are a very good squad
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:21 am
by Cabela10
hockeydad wrote:Cabela10 wrote:Why isn't Rosemount in the Classic Suburban? They are in a conference with West-Southwest schools.
What district does Rosemounts Youth program play in?
Rosemount has been in the Lake since they and Apple Valley left the Missota in the mid '80s.
and, as most people know,
Rosemount, Eagan, Apple Valley and Eastview are all part of the same school district.
I don't give a crap about what school district they are in. I asked what DISTRICT THE YOUTH PROGRAM PLAYS IN.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:06 am
by hockeydad
eagle4life9 wrote:When I played they were always in district 8 with the Lakevilles, Woodbury, Eagan, etc.
And you already had an answer to that question. They are in district 8.
You also asked why they aren't in the Classic Suburban. My post was explaining whey they are in the Lake, which kinda answers your question.
The Classic Suburban is mostly Class A sized schools (exceptions North St. Paul, Tartan and Sibley). With almost 2,000 students according to MSHSL, Rosemount is about twice as big as some of the Classic Suburban schools.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:32 am
by the one to love
Cabela10 wrote:Why isn't Rosemount in the Classic Suburban? They are in a conference with West-Southwest schools.
What district does Rosemounts Youth program play in?
You may want to check the maps again. Last time I saw they were not a west-southwest school. Those would be something like Burnsville over to EP-ish area
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:58 am
by Cabela10
Okay, I was just curious because I remember playing rosemount when I was a kid. I figured they were in the same district as Woodbury, Eagan, Inver Grove, South St. Paul, Hastings, Cottage Grove. All the east suburbs. It's strange to me that they are in a conference with teams that are in the west, Eden Prairie.
High School should keep the youth rivalry's alive and align the conferences as close to the youth programs as possible.
You forgot to mention Hill Murray in your Classic Suburban AA schools.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:09 pm
by hockeydad
Hill Murray is actually the smallest school in the conference by MSHSL enrollment figures. (STA's enrollment is less, but it is an all boys school so the MSHSL doubles the number).
They opt up in hockey only - as they should. all other sports they stay in their assigned class.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:36 pm
by Cabela10
I'm just saying they are playing in the AA class.